charithcutestory.bsky.social
18 posts
27 followers
50 following
Getting Started
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Any ablilerated Qwen model, and obviously for erotica fiction.
comment in response to
post
The problem is that as soon as you store the data on any physical device, its distribution abruptly changes to a pseudo-Riemannian manifold.
comment in response to
post
And as further proof, RFK Jr. wrote up an executive order for Trump to sign that requires the CDC, FDA, NIH, and all of HHS to include details about the new stages in all documents they have that refer to cancer (the new five stages are all caused by vaccines and fluoride apparently).
comment in response to
post
And if you don't believe Trump saying that, he had his team print out a poster showing a human body with all the organs, you know, a smart doctor diagram, and he took a Sharpie and clearly showed where stages five to nine reside in the body.
comment in response to
post
Didn't you know Truml has a second cousin who's a cancerologist? He's the best one out there, so smart, (despite going to the woke-mind-virus plagued Harvard), he's the best cancer doctor (he's got the Trump smart people genes), and he discovered five new stages.
comment in response to
post
The whole "gradually then suddenly" nature of the US hegemony falling apart is exhausting. When do we get to the "suddenly" part? I'm so tired. And who doesn't love a grand finale?
comment in response to
post
I was going read all the replies, but honestly, I'll just go through them tomorrow
comment in response to
post
There are so many wonderful undertones to the fact that this message is being shared right now. It's almost like one could apply it to more than books (or if one wanted to apply it to a specific book about a certain project that's someone wants to implement in a specific year).
comment in response to
post
I can say pretty confidently that no one has ever said, "The far-left super-woke think tank known as the Cato Institute has said..."
I disagree with a lot of their ideas (but only because they're based on core principles incompatible with a thriving free society), the data speaks for itself.
comment in response to
post
Remember which party is coming out against punishing political speech that they disagree with. Also remember that historically when the govt starts punishing political speech, it's very rare that those who say, "don't worry, this will never be applied to [thing I believe," end up being vindicated.
comment in response to
post
OBEY and CONSUME
comment in response to
post
The behavior is punished to discourage it, but I don't hate those people. When they do cross my mind, I feel pity that their life is so empty. And embarrassed vicariously whenever I see a YT video with some asshole being intolerant.
comment in response to
post
I don't know if you're attempting to sarcastically imply that the Democrats behave the same way just towards different groups, but the only thing that tolerance can abide is intolerance, so when intolerance can harm someone else, it will be punished appropriately to discourage it.
comment in response to
post
Admittedly, at some colleges, there are often programs to admit unqualified candidates based on the applicant's identity and other characteristics wholly independent of academic qualifications. Colleges typically call this program "legacy admission."
comment in response to
post
You're hot AF 🔥, you should feel sexy, and I'm glad to see how many sexy men post on BlueSky!
comment in response to
post
Some people don't understand what things like DEI and Affirmative Action are. E.g., They think AA means a less qualified candidate gets the job when it actually means when choosing between multiple *qualified* candidates, you affirmatively pick one whose background will increase diversity.