charity.wtf
cofounder/CTO @honeycombio, co-author of Observability Engineering and Database Reliability Engineering. I test in production and so do you. ππ³οΈβππ¦
398 posts
10,296 followers
276 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Ask and ye shall receive...this paper on "stop treating 'AGI' as the north star goal of AI research" is BRILLIANT. π
bsky.app/profile/jkac...
comment in response to
post
Oh wow, this was brilliant -- thank you!!!
comment in response to
post
Oh... I thought that was what YOU were talking about, too. Thanks βΊοΈ
*shakes the sleep out of her brain*
comment in response to
post
AWWW, shucks! Mutual fan club here, for sure. πππππ§‘β€οΈπ©·
comment in response to
post
Like, "a human" could mean a two year old, a college student who grew up on the internet, an 80 year old who doesn't text...
I'm probably being overly literal here -- again -- but it just seems too loosey-goosey for me to reason about.
comment in response to
post
My cousin works there now!!! I just learned!
comment in response to
post
I think he is? π€
comment in response to
post
Hey, I discovered your talks and writing a couple months ago, when I was doing a deep dive into some stuff around DEI, and I've been meaning to say thanks. It had a huge impact on me.
Thank you. π
comment in response to
post
Haha, love this. Makes a lot more sense in dance terms!
comment in response to
post
I was reading a book last night that described the difference between "positional power" and "personal power".
Standing up in front of the class as a professor for the first time was positional power; earning her students' respect was personal power.
www.amazon.com/Power-Users-...
comment in response to
post
"Ownership" comes with its own set of baggage and assumptions for a lot of people, come to think of it.
Terms are just terms, it's the practice that matters.
comment in response to
post
I like that!
comment in response to
post
Preach π
comment in response to
post
It's the only way to scale all the shit we have to stress about, lol
comment in response to
post
π―
comment in response to
post
(Can't let this moment pass without quoting Bunk from "The Wire", though -- "There you go, giving a fuck when it ain't your turn to give a fuck" π€£ -- always a risk!!)
getyarn.io/yarn-clip/f1...
comment in response to
post
After I became a manager, I started to realize what a relief it is to have people on your team who feel personally accountable and on the hook for things.
It's one less thing you have to worry about, when you can trust someone else is already worrying about it. π
comment in response to
post
Alright, bookmarked this video to watch over the weekend. That was quite a thread! Not sure I'm smart enough to understand cynefin tho π
comment in response to
post
Right! I can tell Serena Williams is an amazing tennis player despite being bad at tennis myself.
Second, the Peter Principle is about promoting people into roles where skills that worked in their prior role aren't useful. It's situational, not about universal competence.
comment in response to
post
Self awareness is the first step on the path to excellence π
comment in response to
post
The world looks very different than it did when I wrote my first piece on the engineer/manager pendulum, in 2017, but it's more relevant and necessary than ever.
comment in response to
post
I agree with this, btw. Although being a good engineer can help you be a good engineering leader. You don't have to be THE BEST, but it's an asset to be good.
In sociotechnical systems, there is precious little that is "just tech" or "just people". It's alllll connected.
bsky.app/profile/elch...
comment in response to
post
I am not sure how anyone could read what I said and have the takeaway be that I don't value leaders or leadership. π
I very much do -- and not just in form of management.
Some of the most important kinds of leadership are most effectively wielded by working engineers.
comment in response to
post
It is exponentially harder to craft sociotechnical systems of the type I describe, where normal software engineers can move fast, ship code, respond to users, understand their systems, and move the business forward every day.
It is *easier* to build systems that rely on heroism and brilliance.
comment in response to
post
You would not be the first to accuse me of being overly literal π
We can definitely agree that anyone who *self identifies* as a 10x engineer, and orients their identity around it, is all but certain to be a raging asshole and source of organization fuckery.
comment in response to
post
This is true, or close enough to true; but there are also lots of companies out there that *never* change their teams or orgs, and they are fragile for a whole different set of reasons.
I don't take issue with your description of the problems, only your overly broad generalization βΊοΈ
comment in response to
post
Thank you, that means a lot π₯°
comment in response to
post
> I think we have come to use βSenior Software Engineerβ as shorthand for engineers who can ship code and be a net positive in terms of productivity, and I think thatβs a huge mistake.
The visceral relief and professional vindication I feel when reading your work.
comment in response to
post
Ah! TIL, but rings true.
comment in response to
post
Same. π
comment in response to
post
Honestly, that would make me feel a tiny sliver better about the world.
comment in response to
post
Haha, well. In the US, the tax prep software lobby is powerful enough to distort public policy
Wish I was joking.
comment in response to
post
Thank you!! π₯° My goal for the past few years has been to turn out one piece of long form writing per month.
I'm not sure I've ever actually *met* that goal, but last year I got close....11 essays, I think?!
comment in response to
post
Making assumptions....π€π€π€ like the one about how people go into management because they aren't competent? Assumptions like that?
comment in response to
post
Is your link to the Peter Principle meant to serve as proof for your claim that people enter management because they are incompetent?
You're going to need more than a work of satire to prove a claim like that, I'm afraid.
comment in response to
post
SO TRUE
comment in response to
post
ooohhhh, that's pretty mean and also not true.
comment in response to
post
there is no point in pouring more energy down this drain π
i always try to give people the benefit of the doubt, and engage in good faith.. but when people tell you who they are, believe them.
comment in response to
post
well, thank you for making your convictions clear.
comment in response to
post
i wrote it for a friend. he paid me $1k! i will be posting the full article to my own blog in a couple months :)
comment in response to
post
indeed!!!
comment in response to
post
catchy, i dig it!
comment in response to
post
i wrote about this too, a few months ago :)
stackoverflow.blog/2024/12/31/g...
comment in response to
post
thank you!! <3
comment in response to
post
They'll be shit outta luck when that person leaves.
Hopefully sooner rather than later.