chipduck.bsky.social
Passionate supporter of human rights. Trying hard to be a student of history. Finding it quite discouraging. Proud CDN in Toronto. Recent victim of USC 922(G)(7)
1,411 posts
505 followers
675 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I enjoyed it very much. Thank you.
comment in response to
post
Tough to overcome ‘stupid’.
comment in response to
post
The commenters have clearly figured her out. What’s wrong with Albertans?
comment in response to
post
Strikes me the primary federal goal is provocation. Trump’s been waiting for a chance to engage the National Guard. I suspect the military will be next.
comment in response to
post
And I will respectfully admit that I might be wrong. But I’ve recently gone through exactly this with my father and Boden’s debate performance was certainly not his first cognitive struggle. Ignoring his support for genocide, I’d agree that he was otherwise a very good President.
comment in response to
post
The fact remains that President Biden was sufficiently cognitively diminished that he should have left office long before he left. It was irresponsible for him, his family and his associates to pretend otherwise. That will rightly tarnish his legacy (not to mention his support for genocide).
comment in response to
post
And every Canadian should read this essay. Privatization sounds great until it bites us in the ass (think Ontario’s #407).
comment in response to
post
If you don’t have NYC readers, you should. Your book is excellent.
comment in response to
post
He could buy #407 for as lot less than he can build his stupid tunnel. But this is the same guy who closed the Science Centre and is building a spa at Ontario Place. Almost everything he does is to benefit his friends and supporters. Ontario’s citizens are never a concern.
comment in response to
post
Agree completely. Speaking out against hatred of any type is a human obligation (as is speaking out against the horrific abuses of the Russians and Zionists and any other country that propagates death and destruction).
comment in response to
post
I think (and hope) you are incorrect. The capital cost is so large, and eventual payback of such projects so long (25+ years), lenders will shy away. The big risk is that government will step in; we should all worry about that. I hope Carney is immune to such entreaties from the oil patch.
comment in response to
post
MIT should have explained that when they made the announcement.
comment in response to
post
I’m wondering if Zelensky might have in fact misdirected Trump and thusly the Russians. He’d be nuts to share anything with the US now (as would any country).
comment in response to
post
I just pray this the policies he advocates reflect his prior appreciation of the perils of climate change. I’m fearful he’ll be reluctant to risk antagonizing regional lunatics.
comment in response to
post
Great observations. Thanks.
comment in response to
post
Agreed, but we have a zillion red gas canisters around. And what happens if power plants and transmission lines are disrupted. I’m asking, not opining 🤔
comment in response to
post
True. I was thinking more about transportation issues. Gasoline for vehicles is probably more ‘distributed’ and more easily distributed than are electrons (today, at least). I lack the knowledge but I suspect the Ukrainians are struggling more with their distribution of electrons….
comment in response to
post
Please explain. I’d have thought the opposite.
comment in response to
post
Credit won’t be available to fund new pipelines; so the ONLY funding will come from governments, which in my view would be astonishingly stupid and shortsighted.
comment in response to
post
Genuine question from somebody ordinarily in love with EVs. In the event of war and serious damage to production/the grid, could a population be effectively paralyzed? Speaks to distributed generation as a necessity, perhaps??
comment in response to
post
Thanks.
comment in response to
post
If facts drove government decisions, they’d not have removed fluoride in the first place. It’s all well and good to argue for evidence-based decisions, but how does one handle government-by-morons (as seems to be ubiquitous in AB at the moment)?
comment in response to
post
Nobody should be surprised. More of this is inevitable. What should surprise all of us is that there are still assholes in the US supportive of such obscene actions by the government.
comment in response to
post
I very much enjoyed CHILDREN OF RADIUM. Thank you. Should you ever visit Toronto please let me know. We’ll organize a book event.
comment in response to
post
And the federal tax contribution from corporates in comparison to that of individuals has dropped even more dramatically (from a 1:1 ratio to almost 1:4). That should also be addressed.
comment in response to
post
I’d respectfully suggest that cutting taxes for the bottom two or three quintiles of earners could reasonably be offset by increased taxes on the two highest quintiles and corporates. Look at a chart of the past 50 years… marginal tax rates have dropped too far.
comment in response to
post
Are we not concerned he’ll find a way to cancel or delay 2026 elections? He’ll likely face a loss of control of both houses and possible impeachment, no? I think the risk is not getting the attention it merits.
comment in response to
post
Good questions. I’d have thought it singular, no?
comment in response to
post
You are ENTIRELY correct.