ckrss.bsky.social
830 posts
86 followers
331 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
I agree with the principle in general but the times has spent years relentlessly attacking trans people and writing for them at all feels like a slap in the face. Yes, it's wrong to misrepresent Mark's writing but I think it's also wrong to ignore the context.
comment in response to
post
You're quote tweeting only the replies you can dunk on while ignoring the replies explaining why you're wrong. This way you can always look like you're winning the argument!
Most accounts with larger followings don't do this because it's obviously scummy and unethical!
comment in response to
post
It's just a really inefficient way to discuss anything. Why not just make a normal straightforward argument?
comment in response to
post
You took both sides to the extreme to make your argument sound stronger, which ironically is what people tend to do when their argument is weak. What you said isn't even relevant to the post, which was a response to someone claiming there are no use cases.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
This is an emotional argument for you. There's nothing anyone can say to change your mind if your priority is feeling good lol
comment in response to
post
That's not what he means by normal. Use the context
comment in response to
post
Why are you ignoring all of the correct replies telling you you're not entitled to anyone's attention?
Transphobes are inherently self centered so this is very on brand for a French
comment in response to
post
Have you really never heard "history won't be kind to X"?
In the present, the public learns from the media
In the future, the public will learn from history books
That's the comparison being made. Present day historians are irrelevant to the point. You're "getting tired of" a common saying lmao
comment in response to
post
Anyway just keep working at it. I'll be checking your posts to evaluate your progress.
comment in response to
post
You can just say "lol troll" to nobody (because I'm muting you), but you know that everything I just said is true, which means you're an open book. So you're an unlikeable white boy who everyone can see is trying too hard to be liked.
comment in response to
post
You crave validation but don't know how to get people to like you, so you're trying to force it. Based on your bio and current behavior, it's probably because you aren't likeable.
comment in response to
post
Let me help you.
1. Screenshot - don't act like that. Universally annoying and cringe. *whispers* lol jesus
2. Your Cishet White Boy Super Ally efforts are really transparent. Your posts couldn't look more calculated. That's why your engagement never increases.
comment in response to
post
jesus dude no, he used this quote as evidence that the pentagon is against hegseth. this isn't up for debate.
comment in response to
post
Do you think journalists just quote people because they're journalists? Like the quote is just there to be there? lmao
comment in response to
post
She* and no, I was describing something that uses only my PC's power, saves me 1 hour a day, makes my shitty tranny life easier, and is something we should encourage instead of saying "AI bad" to people who will use it regardless.
Love being misrepresented by a transphobe to her 823902 followers
comment in response to
post
6. Anyone who wants a screenshot for #1 dm me.
comment in response to
post
5. You became aggressive because you were wrong in front of your followers. So instead of admitting it, you began criticizing me personally and lying about what you'd said - that useful, green AI is "imaginary." This is, again, not something normal adults do. That's the behavior of a narcissist.
comment in response to
post
4. Insulting a person as if they aren't there, and then telling them that they are "focused on themself" when they respond, is also not something normal adults do. That's the behavior of a narcissist.
comment in response to
post
3. Selectively quoting replies so you can dunk on someone who has no way of communicating context to your large audience is not something normal adults do. That's the behavior of a narcissist.
comment in response to
post
2. You left out that I was responding to a man who called me "tech illiterate" and "old." But you had to so you could say I just wanted applause right?
comment in response to
post
1. I like to think I'm a woman, but based on your past comments you might disagree if you saw me (I'll be the first to say I don't pass). But maybe your views really have "evolved" as you claimed the day you apologized.
comment in response to
post
She doesn't have to be doing what she's been doing at all
comment in response to
post
We can do both
comment in response to
post
Oh I should add that my language model is instructed to format and word things exactly the way I prefer it, so it really isn't possible for a human to do it better. You're categorically wrong.
comment in response to
post
You appear to be an adult. I encourage you to learn how to be wrong with grace. Becoming hostile and trying to wiggle your way out of it looks infinitely worse. So yeah hopefully you work on that. I'll mute this now. Good luck.
comment in response to
post
Instead of saying "oh ok I didn't know," you started criticizing me personally. You seem to be completely incapable of admitting you're wrong, even about the most trivial things, so you end up making completely irrational arguments.
comment in response to
post
I'm actually not going to read your response. The reality is you don't know much about AI. You didn't know all LLMs are gen AI. You were wrong about the specific thing we're arguing about.
comment in response to
post
So please explain what exactly you think I'm doing wrong. Millions of people are destroying the environment using ChatGPT. Why do you have such a problem with one of the few people using AI sustainably and telling people about it since they're going to use AI either way?
comment in response to
post
I don't use Google because it uses AI Overview. I don't use ChatGPT or Claude. I think AI companies should be sued out of existence. I think the tech billionaires should be jailed. I use AI in a way that makes my life easier and more pleasant and doesn't harm the environment.
comment in response to
post
We've been talking this entire time about my specific use case. We're not debating issues people have "writ large." And you know that. Being wrong is fine. Moving the goalposts and insulting people instead of acknowledging it isn't, imo.
Can you rewrite this so it's better for me specifically?
comment in response to
post
All LLMs are generative AI.
comment in response to
post
Like you can't just say "AI billionaires are destroying the environment and country so using ChatGPT is bad." You have to say insane shit like "no, you're wrong about what you've been doing full time for the past few years because my personal experience says so."
comment in response to
post
It's seriously astonishing how so many of you will say with complete confidence that you understand a fundamental aspect of a *complete stranger's* job better than they do, based on what is clearly a limited understanding of AI. It's like you're incapable of just saying "oh I didn't know that."
comment in response to
post
i sincerely hope she gives you a fav and fills that emptiness
comment in response to
post
It's never hallucinated. It's summarizing/bulleting less than a few pages of factual information. It is concise and accurate.
comment in response to
post
It's not overly wordy or repetitive and doesn't use stilted language. What else? I'm asking you to support your extraordinary claim that you know better than I do how my computer program performs compared to a human, despite my several years of experience with both.
comment in response to
post
Do you not think this is a political issue?
comment in response to
post
What? Who else is making arguments against AI?
comment in response to
post
It is fundamentally like autocomplete, yes.
comment in response to
post
If you'd like to explain what specifically you think I believe that's incorrect, I'd be glad to tell you why you're wrong. If you're just going to troll and be pedantic I'll just block and move on, no worries.
comment in response to
post
The context doesn't change anything.
me: it writes code
you: no, it [semantic meaning of "writes code"]
Again, I don't care about semantics. People say "writes" and "knows" and "thinks" as shorthand. No one says "well actually it doesn't truly write!" Everyone knows that.
comment in response to
post
What is "good writing" in the context of my work? What are the specific shortcomings of my language model vs a human? Grammar? Clarity? Formatting?
comment in response to
post
Why do you think he included that quote?
comment in response to
post
Do you know what "semantics" means?
comment in response to
post
Hey why did you quote Karoline Leavitt when you know that she's a pathological liar?
comment in response to
post
If you genuinely need me to explain why this is not the same as the find function, I can. If you're just typing for the sake of typing I'll move on.
comment in response to
post
Democrats are afraid of this issue but they could turn so many anxious parents into highly motivated voters
comment in response to
post
If you haven't explored the world of sample libraries yet it's a lot of fun. You can play pretty much any piano you could imagine (not literally but the sounds are real).
comment in response to
post
Oooo yeah this sounds nice. Never played a Kawai. I have a Yamaha P-45, mostly because it can be disassembled and built into a desk. The keys feel pretty nice for the price though.
I use sample libraries instead of the built in voices. This C7 is my favorite: youtu.be/6R76zYJdS-0?...