classicalradical.bsky.social
I like books, movies, manga, anime, etc.
2,516 posts
572 followers
4,960 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't go quite that far. Unlike MAGA in 2020, the blue conspiracy theorists haven't attacked the Capitol, threatened election officials, etc.
comment in response to
post
I don't see any "crap."
comment in response to
post
It may be dawning on him that it's killing his chances of being the Democratic nominee in 2028.
comment in response to
post
While I'd go with people with more political background, I'd welcome a functional independent party.
comment in response to
post
And muted.
comment in response to
post
So you think fascism is magically immune to peaceful challenges while a full-fledged military dictatorship is not.
I think you're just being pedantic to avoid acknowledging that you've been proven wrong.
comment in response to
post
"They go low, we go high" failed. TACO is great.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I totally believe the anti-immigrant party is going to allow immigrants to become president. /s
comment in response to
post
No can do; he wasn't born here.
comment in response to
post
Who would have expected that an administration composed of obviously unstable personalities would turn on itself? /s
comment in response to
post
None of which changes the fact that Pinochet was still out on his ass at the end of the day without a violent uprising, something you seem to claim is impossible.
comment in response to
post
As Beijer pointed out, Lula would disagree, as would Bolsonaro.
comment in response to
post
With Republicans in control of both Houses, they can't start procedures, though.
comment in response to
post
You're understimating how dim, uneducated, and unthinking many voters are
comment in response to
post
Agreed. When people talk about California or Portland as liberal bastions, they're referring to today, not a century ago.
comment in response to
post
How is this meme spreading misinformation? It's dead on.
As for the environmental impact, AI makes up roughly one percent of carbon emissions per year. Not enough impact to merit the concerns over it.
comment in response to
post
🙄OK, bigot, I'll be putting you on mute now.
comment in response to
post
What do LLMs smell like? Soder and silicon?
comment in response to
post
I don't think the artists should have a say in the matter unless it's direct plagiarism.
Second, technology taking jobs is nothing new. Funny how the artists never seemed to give a shit when it was blue collar people losing their jobs.
comment in response to
post
Except it isn't directly reproducing the artists' work. That's not what I call stealing.
I have articles up on the internet, which means in all likelihood they've been used to train LLMs. So long as said LLMs don't directly regurgitate my work, I have no issue with that.
comment in response to
post
Sorry, but that's ageism, and it is as wrong as any other form of bigotry. Arguably, ageism contributed to Trump's victory, influencing the stupid decision to drop Biden at the last minute for a candidate who previously showed she couldn't win a presidential race.
comment in response to
post
Unless the AI is directly reprinting what someone wrote, I fail to see the problem. It's especially ironic when you consider that only a few years ago large portions of the artistic community were bitching about copyright restrictions.
comment in response to
post
Your attitude and dismissal of her accomplishments is more a reflection on you than anything else.
comment in response to
post
It's a mocking political meme. It doesn't need to be a masterpiece.
comment in response to
post
Huh? How does that logically follow from anything I've said?
I'm beginning to think you're a bot. Muted.
comment in response to
post
Brennan has a tendency to pull her punches in interviews. For her to be shaking her head at him shows just how unconvincing he is.
comment in response to
post
Seriously, if, as your profile claims, you want to be "united and friends" you're going about it in the worst way possible.
comment in response to
post
Get over yourself, bub.
comment in response to
post
Your hypothetical scenario would be an improvement over our current situation.
Honestly, you sound like one of the people who panicked over Biden having one bad debate and demanded we install a candidate who lost every swing state.
comment in response to
post
🙄Someone disagreeing with you doesn't make them "goofy."
comment in response to
post
She's the best Supreme Court justice of our lifetimes. Maybe drop the ageism and look at her actual accomplishments.
comment in response to
post
For starters, it's LITERALLY HER WORDS.
Second, she accomplished a lot more for America than you ever have or ever will.
comment in response to
post
Whatever, bigot.
comment in response to
post
Ditch the ageism. I trusted her more than I would have whatever centrist would have replaced her.
comment in response to
post
OK, troll.
comment in response to
post
Sounds like you need to get past your hang ups regarding AI.
comment in response to
post
And that relates to this how? Neither mother or daughter can change that.
comment in response to
post
The picture looks fine to me.
comment in response to
post
Stop complaining about how pictures are made while politicians are literally telling people to just die.
comment in response to
post
The picture's fine.🙄
comment in response to
post
It doesn't need to be rigged. Republican voters have demonstrated you can treat them like shit, strip their services, and even shorten their lives, and they will still vote for anyone with an R after their name.
comment in response to
post
Still, anyone, no matter their wealth, who's running major government functions shouldn't be using drugs.
comment in response to
post
No, she definitely is.
comment in response to
post
Let's be real: it wouldn't have been another judge with RBG's ideals; it would have been some centrist like the coward Merrick Garland.
comment in response to
post
Ditch the ageism.
comment in response to
post
And yet she's still done more for America than you ever will.
comment in response to
post
Ditch the attitude, bub. Someone disagreeing with you doesn't mean they need a "civics course." Maybe you should take a course on the history of strong progressive leaders.