clintmajors.bsky.social
1,245 posts
113 followers
1 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Which part of my statement was wrong?
comment in response to
post
Fair point—and yes, narratives shape cultures profoundly. But it's also vital to distinguish between the core teachings of a text and how people distort them. Misuse doesn’t invalidate the source—it exposes human failure, not the failure of the narrative itself.
comment in response to
post
This take is a lazy cocktail of half-truths and historical ignorance. The Bible wasn’t written “a million times”—it’s a compiled canon with traceable manuscripts, not celestial fan fiction. Blaming Christianity for every tyrant’s actions is as dumb as blaming science for eugenics.
comment in response to
post
Reich whining about war powers is rich—Congress authorized endless executive war leeway for decades. They abdicated their role, and now he acts shocked? Spare us the drama, Robert. This isn’t new, it’s just another performance from a washed-up bureaucrat playing dumb.
comment in response to
post
Irony overload: the Bible’s extensive translation history proves its preservation, not fabrication. Its sources are better attested than any ancient text. If “man-made” discredits it, then so does every historical document ever. This take is lazy, not learned.
comment in response to
post
Nope.
comment in response to
post
A map labeled "Palestine" in 1 AD doesn’t prove your point. That term was retroactively applied by Romans after 70 AD. Jesus lived in Judea as a Jew—long before “Palestine” was a thing. Holding up a mislabeled map doesn’t make you right, just loud and wrong.
comment in response to
post
Aw, that’s adorable. But no, Jesus wasn’t a “little Palestinian boy.” He was a Jew born under Roman occupation in Judea, not some retrofitted mascot for your narrative. Calling him Palestinian is like calling Aristotle a European Union citizen—laughably wrong.
comment in response to
post
Hmm, nope. I just pointed out the intellectual laziness you keep flaunting with your childish insistence on insults and mockery. You can think whatever you want about me—it doesn’t make it true, and it sure doesn’t change the fact you bring nothing of value.
comment in response to
post
Glad you and your fan club think you’re clever, but all you’ve really done is put your low-IQ takes on full display. Mocking faith with bad jokes isn’t edgy—it’s lazy. If ignorance is bliss, you must be absolutely ecstatic.
comment in response to
post
Wrong. Biblically and historically, Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea (Matthew 2:1), taught in Galilee, but frequently traveled to and preached in Judea, especially Jerusalem. Judea and Galilee were both part of ancient Israel under Roman rule.
comment in response to
post
Actually, you're embarrassingly wrong. Jesus was Jewish, spoke Aramaic, and lived centuries before "Palestine" even existed as a political term. His name means “God saves,” not a modern slogan. If anyone’s rewriting history, it’s you—poorly. YW 😁
comment in response to
post
Wrong but thanks for trying. Jesus wasn’t Palestinian. He was a Jewish man born in Bethlehem and lived in Judea under Roman rule. “Palestine” wasn’t even a name for the region until 100 years after his death—imposed by Romans to erase Jewish identity. Stop rewriting history to suit modern agendas.
comment in response to
post
Or you could simply not enter the country illegally or join a gang. That’s also a surefire way to protect yourself. Glad we solved that problem.
comment in response to
post
What exactly are they resisting? Who is this "King" they are protesting?
comment in response to
post
Wanna try that again?
comment in response to
post
If you actually cared about facts, you'd hold off on your sanctimonious statements until all the evidence came out—but thinking before speaking clearly isn’t your strong suit, is it?
comment in response to
post
I asked a simple question. You couldn’t answer, so you lashed out like a dull child pretending to be clever. Insults aren’t a defense mechanism — they’re just your way of admitting you’ve got nothing worth saying.
comment in response to
post
Had enough of what exactly?
comment in response to
post
I guess I'm confused care to explain what you mean?
comment in response to
post
Care to provide a reason why?
comment in response to
post
What “tyranny” are they pretending to fight? These pampered clowns have lived such cushy lives they’ve mistaken law enforcement for oppression. They wouldn’t know real tyranny if it kicked in their door. This isn’t resistance—it’s victim cosplay in a war they made up.
comment in response to
post
Who exactly is this “king” we’re supposed to be protesting? And what, specifically, are we protesting against?
comment in response to
post
Padilla did barge in and got cuffed, McIver was caught on camera assaulting ICE, yet you're pushing some delusional oppression narrative. This isn’t about who’s seen as a “threat”—it’s about actions having consequences. Facts don’t care about your victim complex.
comment in response to
post
Do they? How so?
comment in response to
post
Lol
comment in response to
post
Angry women against what exactly?
comment in response to
post
Where’s the xenophobia? All I did was call out the idiocy of fleeing a country, then repping it after running. That’s not hate—it’s logic. Screaming “xenophobia” is just your lazy way of dodging the fact you’ve got no substance and zero defense for the hypocrisy.
comment in response to
post
Just curious—if you have no valid response and resort to childish attacks, why even bother? Is it because you feel strongly about something but have no clue what it is or how to defend it? Sounds like you should spend less time attackingand more time learning how to back up your beliefs, sweetheart
comment in response to
post
You fled your broken country for a better life in America, then have the nerve to wave its flag like it did you favors? If you’re such a proud supporter, go back. No one begged you to stay. Repping what you escaped isn’t culture—it’s clownery.
comment in response to
post
“Not brains, just bile”? Cute deflection, George. You’re still salty the Trump team got further in five minutes than your smug, beltway-approved losers did in decades. Miller reshaped policy. You reshaped your brand into a whining MSNBC lapdog. Sit down.
comment in response to
post
Such a dumb lack of understanding statement.
comment in response to
post
"Lady Liberty held captive”? Lol, dramatic much? What exactly are these rights you’ve lost under Trump—freedom to exaggerate on social media? But sure, The New Yorker nailed your deep feelings. So brave.
comment in response to
post
Nope, I didn't do that at all—I simply pointed out that the exaggerated statement was incorrect and that the survival rate was due to a combination of all those factors.
comment in response to
post
I appreciate you asking a question but would you care to reread my statement?
comment in response to
post
The statement is a lazy distortion of history. It ignores that infant deaths dropped thanks to clean water, sanitation, and antibiotics—not just vaccines. Overselling vaccines as the sole savior insults real public health progress and dumbs down a complex truth.
comment in response to
post
You're still missing the point. It’s not about the Whiskey Rebellion itself—it’s the absurdity of imagining the Founders cheering as the modern state punishes Trump for political dissent or “wrongthink.” That clash between their legacy and today’s reality is the satire.
comment in response to
post
My point wasn't a history lesson but a critique of today’s bloated federal power. The irony is imagining the Founders cheering modern crackdowns, which mocks how far we've strayed from their rebellious spirit.
comment in response to
post
I think you missed the point.
comment in response to
post
Are you?
comment in response to
post
Oh totally, the whiskey-rebelling, tyranny-hating, government-suspicious Founders would’ve cheered as a bloated federal machine hauled Trump off for wrongthink. Washington in riot gear, Jefferson handing out subpoenas—real constitutional energy. The real irony is you won't see the sarcasm until now.
comment in response to
post
This is historically illiterate. The British East India Company was a tax-evading monopoly backed by the Crown. The founders opposed exactly that. Using government to hoard wealth was never their stated or structural intent.
comment in response to
post
Really how so?
comment in response to
post
I did just not how you wanted.
comment in response to
post
I think if it didn’t matter that much, you wouldn’t have felt compelled to respond. I didn’t make a personal judgment — I just called the strike. Pointing out that you let your ego take over isn’t judgment, it’s just helpful life advice. Take it or leave it, but you clearly wanted a response.
comment in response to
post
No specifically you for thinking someone owes you an apology just because they didn’t think Trump bad as much as you did is peak arrogance. You’re not entitled to emotional validation from others just because they didn’t match your outrage. That’s not moral clarity — it’s ego.
comment in response to
post
1. It’s not name-calling to point out a fact: you’re being arrogant by thinking you’re owed an apology.
2. You’re doubling down on that arrogance by saying you’ll make someone “mincemeat” if they suck you into it.
comment in response to
post
You sure can — just don’t complain when you don’t get the response you wanted. Criticism isn’t hate, lol.
comment in response to
post
You say I need a hobby, but if you don’t want people commenting, maybe don’t post your desperate need for an apology on social media.
comment in response to
post
Lol, the arrogance of thinking you're owed an apology because someone didn’t vote how you wanted — or didn’t join your meltdown — is unreal. You lost a friend over your own reaction.