corcorana.bsky.social
vagally-interested postdoc attempting to reduce uncertainty @ http://monash.edu/m3cs & https://arc-intrepid.com | caffeine abuser | bunny whisperer | open science enthusiast | thoughts almost certainly not his own
47 posts
698 followers
396 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I'm genuinely curious... what is the purpose of this sort of post ?
comment in response to
post
Massive thanks to @danfeuerriegel.bsky.social @jonnorobinson.bsky.social & @kperrykkad.bsky.social for continuing to explore these ideas with me
comment in response to
post
While that work focused on the potential impact of visceral signals on neural development & perceptual learning, our new paper considers how the top-down regulation of such signals across multiple scales may engender agentic control, selfhood, & neurobehavioural diversity
comment in response to
post
This work follows from our earlier analysis of embodied active inference & the role of rhythmic visceral dynamics in prenatal development
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
comment in response to
post
otherwise this might be helpful www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
comment in response to
post
psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-...
possibly (if you can get hold of it) ?
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't say either of those things because I'm not interested in analogies with laptop computers, I'm interested in developmental biology... and the research in that area that I am familiar with supports what I said in my original post.
comment in response to
post
(FWIW I don't think this undermines your study, which looks very interesting)
comment in response to
post
Might 'enable' in a broad sense... but this doesn't mean innate behaviour is necessarily encoded in the genome (that genetic programming is sufficient for behavioural expression) -- at least some classic examples of innate behaviour depend on prenatal experience
comment in response to
post
go on then
comment in response to
post
The first of which was recently preprinted on @biorxiv-neursci.bsky.social
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
comment in response to
post
to me this really highlights the magnitude of the problem FJN & similar initiatives face... there's 1 journal in this list I've heard of & I wouldn't consider submitting to it
comment in response to
post
some I knew & some I didn't... thanks for hooking me up
comment in response to
post
I'm interested
comment in response to
post
"Can a good theory be built using bad ingredients?" What a question! Sarahanne Field and colleagues look for the answer in replication failures and their relationship to theory development.
comment in response to
post
the meta starter pack problem
comment in response to
post
number 5 ?
comment in response to
post
except they are. (of sorts.)