curiouscaine.bsky.social
Retired (for now?) tech executive, musician, word nerd, truth teller, EFT practitioner (Emotional Freedom Technique, aka Tapping), husband, dad and grandad. Love languages, woodworking, veggie gardening. Am known to have a political opinion now and then.
1,815 posts
1,583 followers
449 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
There are several commentaries I've seen arguing that it is a fake.
comment in response to
post
Constitution? What constitution?
comment in response to
post
Aren't these guys the famous slavery defenders? All King Henry wanted when he founded the Anglican church was a divorce.
comment in response to
post
Does having an affair with another political partisan count as "marriage fraud?" Asking for a cabinet secretary.
comment in response to
post
If you finished, mazel tov!!
comment in response to
post
Isn't there a cosplay party somewhere that she needs to go to?
comment in response to
post
Funny- I was planning to sing that at karaoke tonight.
comment in response to
post
Let's go, Cosplay! (Duh duh duh duh duh)
comment in response to
post
If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is.
comment in response to
post
I applaud you for *beginning* to oppose orange Jesus, Sen. Paul. Please encourage your colleagues to speak out. You do your party and the nation no good by tolerating his pettiness and inanity.
comment in response to
post
This for me is key. No duly appointed government agent should be wearing a mask-period- the end.
comment in response to
post
And by all means do NOT do this with a burner phone.
comment in response to
post
Oh please, God! (f there is one)
comment in response to
post
If only it were a pattern at CNN, but I suspect it is a one-off that somebody let slip through.
comment in response to
post
A prophetic one at that. At this point, having the White House sponsored by Carl's Jr. seems pretty tame.
comment in response to
post
Policy no longer matters. Until we have a democracy that is fully functional again, I don't care that much. Let's restore democracy and then debate policy.
comment in response to
post
Isn't that approximately the cost of, oh, say, a military parade in Washington, D.C.?
comment in response to
post
The original Moody Blues!
comment in response to
post
I can't wait to se how many MAGAts line up to to get these jobs now that the "job-stealers" are gone!
comment in response to
post
Screw the podcast, Gavin- when you fight, you win.
comment in response to
post
Excellent. Kimmel is a compelling voice for common sense.
comment in response to
post
Sounds like a plan!
comment in response to
post
Swallowing the stuff is the easy part as you are about to find out!
comment in response to
post
Love the double entendre! Go Newsom!
comment in response to
post
Clutching her pearls again. But has she mentioned the use of the military on false pretenses?
comment in response to
post
Biden was/is feeble, but his thought process was linear and coherent, his fundamental decision-making abilities did not appear to be impaired. The current occupant of the WH, on the other hand, is an irrational blathering fool. That is an important distinction.
comment in response to
post
Is Brad Bondi related to the "AG?"
comment in response to
post
Wait- Trump "writes?"
comment in response to
post
I've suspected this since the election. But if Harris and the Democratic party didn't think there was enough evidence to be worth raising objections then I question how much evidence there really is. But it certainly sounds suspicious.
comment in response to
post
Screw the polls. Ask Chat GPT to analyze the bill to get an unemotional analysis. Challenge Fox News to do it with you on live TV.
comment in response to
post
The parade is the cover story for declaring martial law against a non-existent threat IMO.
comment in response to
post
Let's be fair- it was no big deal when Biden did it (despite the media) and it's no big deal when Trump does it (despite the media).
comment in response to
post
I promise I won't lay a hand on a federal agent with a badge, identification and face uncovered. Agents of the law don't dress up as outlaws.
comment in response to
post
And if you can't find a better source than "someone posted this on social media" then it probably didn't happen. Snopes and Chat GPT are your friends for verifying.