dangaristo.bsky.social - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

Today's extract from Serving the Reich. What makes it worse is that I don't even need to add any explanatory comment, do I?

submitted 2 days ago • 4 comments

From a source at NSF Sign reads: "Each book represents critical knowledge lost that would have driven US innovation and bolstered American security. 168 books and counting..."

submitted 3 days ago • 1 comment

NEW: The Trump administration is exploiting a loophole to keep funding frozen at the NIH - a move that some legal scholars say is illegal. Federal Register notices are blocked, so no grant-review sessions can be scheduled. All the gritty details here, and a short 🧵: www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 3 days ago • 4 comments

Unions are suing to block some of the mass layoffs. One reason they're challenging: false claims of performance issues--many terminated staff in fact had glowing reviews. www.afge.org/publication/...

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

In its speed, severity, and sheer scope, the first month of the second Trump administration has been a completely unprecedented assault on US science. Story w/ @alexwitze.bsky.social, @maxkozlov.bsky.social, and Jeff Tollefson: www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 4 days ago • 3 comments

Feb 20 (@reuters.com) - Some U.S. Food and Drug Administration scientists have been told to stop using the words "woman," "disabled" and "elderly" in external communications, two sources familiar with the matter said. www.reuters.com/world/us/fda...

submitted 4 days ago • 13 comments

There are often understandable differences between what the press releases says and what the paper says; matters of jargon, etc. In this case, the editors are in direct disagreement with the claims of the press release, which cites the peer review in Nature as its validation.

submitted 4 days ago • 1 comment

"Truth is our superpower, and we should speak out about science, even when the climate is a difficult one." A curious statement from the new APS president, given that the society has not issued any statements about challenges to science since Jan. 20. www.aps.org/apsnews/2025...

submitted 4 days ago • 1 comment

Not the first time journal editors have issued unusual caveats about a Microsoft paper on topological QC.

submitted 5 days ago • 2 comments

"For Nancy Hastings, the face of the federal government is the young man who picks her up every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 5:45 a.m. to drive her to dialysis...Then suddenly, in late January, word came that he was gone." Must-read by @ericboodman.bsky.social: www.statnews.com/2025/02/18/i...

submitted 5 days ago • 0 comments

Which universities have the most retracted articles - and the highest retraction rates? For @nature.com, here's a first-of-its-kind analysis of retractions by institutions. Full details in the story. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 5 days ago • 4 comments

NEW: NSF confirmed that they fired 168 employees today, out of their staff of ~1,500 feds. This includes some people who'd finished their 1-year probationary periods, which were extended to 2-years last month without explanation. More to come.

submitted 6 days ago • 30 comments

Took a break from science policy to write about a more cheerful subject: simulations of how the universe might eventually (in ~10^790 years) bite it. www.scientificamerican.com/article/quan...

submitted 6 days ago • 0 comments

The lead prosecutor in the Eric Adams case has resigned over DOJ's order that the case be dismissed. "I expect you will eventually find someone who will be enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion. But it was never going to be me." www.nytimes.com/interactive/...

submitted 10 days ago • 65 comments

Ted Cruz’s “woke” science list contains a lot of basic, fundamental research that got flagged for simply addressing broader impacts (as Congress requires). As absurd as the list seems, it’s making scientists uneasy. My latest: www.npr.org/2025/02/13/n...

submitted 11 days ago • 8 comments

Whether you're a federal employee with sensitive info, a researcher with a grant on the line, or just a reader with thoughts about science policy, please feel free to reach out.

submitted 11 days ago • 0 comments

Some strong criticism of Šmejkal et al.'s work on altermagnetism and its potential for spintronics.

submitted 11 days ago • 0 comments

Fascinating piece, especially re: the changing role of retractions.

submitted 12 days ago • 1 comment

Have Trump’s anti-DEI orders hit private funders? For this story, I reached out to 6 big private funders, like @chanzuckerberg.bsky.social, @bloombergdotorg.bsky.social, to see if they plan to modify their offerings, like @hhmi.bsky.social. Only 3 responded. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 13 days ago • 1 comment

Blunt clarity from a doctor: The NIH rate cut would further cost the hospital nearly $40 million each year, he says. “This will likely mean that fewer experimental treatments will get to children,” he adds. “More children will die.” www.nature.com/articles/d41...

submitted 13 days ago • 0 comments

Everyone's in an uproar about the restrictions on indirect costs for NIH grants (now on hold). "HHS...declined to answer Nature’s queries about the lawsuit or about scientists’ concerns about the indirect-costs policy." By @maxkozlov.bsky.social @dangaristo.bsky.social @heidiledford.bsky.social

submitted 13 days ago • 0 comments

BREAKING: Federal judge temporarily blocks NIH indirect costs rate cap issued Friday as applied to states that sued over the act this morning. Judge Angel Kelley, a Biden appointee, ordered further briefing as well, and set a hearing on Feb 21 in the case. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

submitted 13 days ago • 31 comments

BREAKING: 22 states sue NIH over Trump administration's new 15% cap on overhead for federal research grants. Suit filed federal court in Boston contends lifesaving research 'will grind to a halt' under the policy. Doc: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

submitted 14 days ago • 65 comments

Shocking news: "A STAT examination of company documents and expert interviews reveals that AI-powered biotechs like Absci and competitor Generate routinely aggrandize their AI abilities." www.statnews.com/2025/02/10/a...

submitted 14 days ago • 1 comment

It appears ACS has edited its website to remove the word diversity here, though the linked 2024 statement in support of diversity remains identical. New: www.acs.org/about/inclus... Old: web.archive.org/web/20250118...

submitted 14 days ago • 1 comment

Ricci Don't Lose That Number

submitted 16 days ago • 0 comments

attempting to describe the vibes of the moment. have yet to do better than: "imagine watching a documentary reenacting the burning of the Library of Alexandria set to the soundtrack of 'Yakety Sax'"

submitted 18 days ago • 145 comments

Big piece tracking all chaos in science policy across government agencies. www.science.org/content/arti...

submitted 18 days ago • 1 comment