danielrbright.bsky.social
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm15561539/?ref_=nm_mv_close
https://www.thebrightfirm.law/labor-law/
150 posts
132 followers
85 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
If Trump is seeking emotional distress damages, a real defendant would be demanding all his medical records and an independent medical examination by a psychiatrist or psychologist to explore his mental state and the causes of any emotional distress he claims to have suffered.
comment in response to
post
This is the federal law they’ve invoked.
www.justice.gov/archives/jm/...
comment in response to
post
They are no longer to be referred to as bidets. They are henceforth to be referred to as Freedom Fountains.
comment in response to
post
Baraka is charged with a petty disorderly persons offense (defiant trespassing, New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice
Section 2C:18-3). It isn’t even a crime. So no indictment is necessary and in most cases, a summons would be issued with no arrest being made.
comment in response to
post
Gasparino and/or his sources don't seem to understand what the word "mediator" means. Mediators don't decide anything.
comment in response to
post
So this is how he’s earned the title of best deal maker ever. Genius-level negotiation tactics on display here for all to learn from.
comment in response to
post
He might die, just to spite us.
comment in response to
post
I guess they’re starting to figure out China is holding some pretty good cards.
comment in response to
post
Where’s Mr. Oversight, Chuck Grassley?
comment in response to
post
Bondi wouldn’t be doing press interviews from the White House if Garland had done his job properly.
comment in response to
post
It’s nice to see Rubio getting along with Trump after their initial, rocky start. It shows maturity and growth.
comment in response to
post
It’s a strange way to flirt.
comment in response to
post
Clergy, too.
comment in response to
post
What do you expect Trump to do? He doesn’t hold the cards. El Salvador’s holding all the cards. Bukele’s hand is so strong, in fact, that he aggressively flaunted not wearing a tie to the Oval Office and no one thought to question his sartorial act of disrespect to our President and nation.
comment in response to
post
At least your disdain for inclusive legal positivism is being proven to be well founded.
comment in response to
post
No. The real insult to Trump is the fact that Bukele didn’t have the decency to wear a tie. And how many times did Bukele thank Trump for all the aid the U.S. has provided to El Salvador over the years? JD Vance, Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio must be furious over his impertinence and disrespect.
comment in response to
post
Harvard's president rightly called out Trump's antisemitism demands as a political ploy:
“The intention is not to work with us to address antisemitism...[They] represent direct governmental regulation of the ‘intellectual conditions’ at Harvard.”
www.thecrimson.com/article/2025...
comment in response to
post
They’re as courageous and principled as the big law firms that have been cutting “deals” with Trump.
comment in response to
post
Why isn’t Bukele being excoriated for not wearing a tie? How dare he disrespect the United States like that?
comment in response to
post
It’s hard to believe this is happening, what with all the powerful pushback from university presidents who’ve been accused of tolerating, and perhaps encouraging, anti-Jewish pogroms at their schools.
comment in response to
post
There’s also a law that requires the President to take necessary actions short of an act of war to secure the release of U.S. citizens wrongfully imprisoned by a foreign government. I think it’s unenforceable though.
comment in response to
post
I wonder if the contract has a choice of law provision. Does El Salvadorean law allow for the voiding on a contract on unconscionability grounds. Does DC law apply? This gets more stupid by the hour.
comment in response to
post
Can't the US just issue a change order, directing El Salvador to release Abrego Garcia? This is a government contract, after all.
comment in response to
post
It's been obvious all along. Destroying universities and saying you're doing it for the Jews makes it the Jews' fault. Attacking Jewish university presidents for supposedly allowing their schools to become antisemitic dystopias is the kind of FU to Jews that brings smiles to the faces of Jew haters.
comment in response to
post
Image all the money these business people have "invested" in Trump and Melania meme coins.
comment in response to
post
It might distract them from Pete Hegseth's noble vision of a military composed of ruthless, drunken, war crime committing warriors.