danjdevine.bsky.social
public opinion, behaviour, attitudes, &c.
Associate Prof, @sotonpolitics.bsky.social; Assoc. Editor, @poqjournal.bsky.social & @jeppjournal.bsky.social
ColU, Pompey, music, books, & pubs
https://djdevine.org
415 posts
3,195 followers
1,017 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Congratulations!
comment in response to
post
Haha, if Charles Uni is charging them double what Leuphana did, they've been played.
comment in response to
post
Oh nice, will read. Appreciate this summary over the more diplomatic abstract.
comment in response to
post
Registered reports? In the works at @jeppjournal.bsky.social, but no specific timeline yet. One of those things that seems easy but absolutely baffles the system/publisher.
comment in response to
post
Awaiting decision on a paper that is in part descriptive, and hoping that the time has arrived
comment in response to
post
Going to put that Nintendo Switch I've been thinking about for a few years on expenses now...
comment in response to
post
Yes, that's why I didn't check the prices before booking travel etc. Who knows what happened this year, but god -- this is a real hit when our budgets are being squeezed anyway.
comment in response to
post
I have booked my accommodation but not seen the registration fees. That is insane, especially for something where the panels are organised almost entirely by the academics.
comment in response to
post
Not saying these groups aren't important and there's obviously something in a highly motivated left-wing progressive group. But I'm not sure what to take from them being different on cultural issues when a part of their definition is that they're distinct on cultural issues.
comment in response to
post
Here, for instance, they're not much different to the rest on economic issues. But economic issues don't really form much of the (sample of) questions used to classify the groups, so that makes sense.
bsky.app/profile/luke...
comment in response to
post
These are some of the questions used to classify the segments.
If the group is defined even in part by these answers and how 'extreme' they are, then it'd be almost by definition that they're going to be distinct on questions about cultural issues, be more engaged, etc.
comment in response to
post
'Missing: ethical' a particular highlight
comment in response to
post
Getting the same treatment is a collection of papers on 'EU integration in crisis': all now free to read, if they weren't already.
www.tandfonline.com/journals/rjp...
comment in response to
post
Thanks, both. We're still with 'normal' coursework and figuring ways to make it harder to cheat. But for smaller modules lots of these might work for next year.
comment in response to
post
Like what types of assessments?
comment in response to
post
I think it is actually a Thing that in the UK it's a positive to be seen to be very successful whilst not working a lot, so successful people downplay how much they're actually working.
comment in response to
post
Yes -- had to do that for the first time this week. A small lecture (~20 people) and 3 people just having a full conversation. Weird.
I also watch a lot of live music and have seen it in the crowd as well. Like quieter music and people down the front just having a full volume conversation.
comment in response to
post
Sorry Jon, your nice words can't save you from the JEPPless bed you've made for yourself!
comment in response to
post
Well, I'm forwarding this to Berthold to get you on the JEPP blacklist we have
comment in response to
post
Yeah, JOP is the real stand-out in terms of IF/acceptance rate vs perception.
Anyway, I'd include all the ones I'm familiar with on that list above, personally.
comment in response to
post
I guess IF is actually a useful measure there, and several of those are 'higher' or the same as ones not on that list which I presume are included, like Research & Politics or BJPIR, and CEP > PSRM, etc.
comment in response to
post
although I can't judge many of these, I think I'd find it surprising to exclude CEP/JEPOP/Politics/JEPS and others without good reasons (which might be: this is all loads of work already!).
I'm basing that on little else than 'eh, I would submit there and not consider it extremely niche'.
comment in response to
post
I don't think we looked at local but typically local is more trusted than national @viktorv.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
Great! I have been astounded by the effort and time reviewers put in so far.
comment in response to
post
research*, but researcherS* is also true!