dankeshet.bsky.social
Austin urbanist
2,350 posts
1,335 followers
264 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Is that the set of Westworld?
comment in response to
post
PORTLAND IS USING UP ALL THE FOURPLEXES
comment in response to
post
Not *my* internet experience 🙄
comment in response to
post
Spokane's catching the f up @spokanerising.com (credit to @sid-kap.bsky.social's Housing Data site).
comment in response to
post
Nothing better than every little cold turning into a 103 degree bounce-back fever. jfc
comment in response to
post
that's why you wear kneepads man
comment in response to
post
I strongly support measures to make side streets safer. Not because I think it will significantly reduce injuries — they're already pretty low — but because it will give more kids freedom to walk and bike to their friends' houses, the library, etc.
comment in response to
post
Most serious injuries (yellow) and the overwhelming percentage of traffic fatalities (red) in Austin are on highways and arterials managed by TxDOT.
comment in response to
post
More:
comment in response to
post
Forgive me.
comment in response to
post
If there's any act that's going to catch the awareness of military planners, it's cutting one leg of the nuclear triad of one of the two true nuclear superpowers with $500k
comment in response to
post
So is electing a criminal they key to policy reform?
comment in response to
post
Eric Adams crimed so that you don't have to.
comment in response to
post
At least reportedly, they had AI navigation systems trained on museum pieces
comment in response to
post
Ha, no, the brand new, never-heard-before sentence was "I should be more online"
comment in response to
post
I'm curious your thoughts on effects from Texas / CT / other states' YIMBYish reforms for SFR / MFR housing starts.
comment in response to
post
www.reddit.com/r/BrandNewSe...
comment in response to
post
/r/brandnewsentences
comment in response to
post
Korea and the box fans I guess.
comment in response to
post
Given how little evidence backs the changes, how do we distinguish the useful ones from the non-useful ones? If a state rep comes to me and says "how do I know this isn't the code provision that makes the building safe", what do I say?
comment in response to
post
I'm curious your assessment on how this will affect the war.
comment in response to
post
Pilots are more mobile than planes.
comment in response to
post
A few years ago, Russia produced a video of Zelensky ordering troops to surrender. Nobody took it seriously because it wasn't very believable. Someday soon, someone's going to produce a video fake like that with enormous results. Picture an October surprise.
comment in response to
post
To become law, the House must still pass bills on third reading, and then the governor must sign them. Additionally, because the House amended SB1567, the Senate must concur or conference with the House about it.
comment in response to
post
Yes, a small technical fix needs to be re-voted. Zero reason to think it would lose a vote but there's obviously a fear that it gets lost in the shuffle. The deadline is later than the Tuesday deadline so it might not get voted on for a few days.
comment in response to
post
ALL-ONE OR NONE! ALL-ONE!
comment in response to
post
An improper bracket excluding an area near a law enforcement training center near UNT.
comment in response to
post
No more phone calls necessary! The bill is on the major state bills Calendar for Tuesday.
comment in response to
post