darkbeacon.bsky.social
any/all
Non-theistic Luciferianism
anarchist religion
religiously anarchist
52 posts
37 followers
51 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Where's the duncan's park shirt?
comment in response to
post
0k
comment in response to
post
For someone calling themselves "truth seeker" (with a hideous AI profile pic), you're awfully bad at comprehensive reading...
comment in response to
post
And regardless of all that, he's handling people's food, while doing whatever!! That's fucking vile..
comment in response to
post
Are they taking the lights with them on honeymoon? 😶
comment in response to
post
He uses "micromanage", it isn't effective at all.
comment in response to
post
And there are ways to mute them, and anyone who pushes that slop, which is lovely.
comment in response to
post
Relatable, I also hate the concept of needing to reach a certain quota of "reaching out to people" to keep a reputation, or whatever.
Normalise seeing people once every full moon after an eclipse, and still be besties.
It's called quality time, not quantity time.
(If unrelated, I apologize)
comment in response to
post
My dad loved Pink Floyd, I'm all for psychedelic doom/space rock, so there's definitely some influence there.
My mom likes whatever sounds "catchy/happy" on the radio, Im lucky I dodged that bullet, however.
comment in response to
post
Ah, the silverhand cyber-toxoplasmosis, classic
comment in response to
post
Love this (not so) little fella so much!
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't even consider Sanders "far" left, just left.
The fact that it's the furthest the US knows as left is telling, tbh.
(Not saying far is better, just baffling what the US considers far compared to the rest of the globe)
comment in response to
post
What far left in the US? And how did they screwed us? I'm genuinely curious.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I get that.
It's also typical when having autism and other neurodiversities (not speaking for everyone, ofc. Each experience is different) to need to point out patterns/inconsistencies, etc.
It's incredibly hard to ignore, as you'd feel like you're "just letting this happen, while you knew."
comment in response to
post
There are good religious individuals, true.
There are no good religious organisations.
But which one has the most influence on a global scale? A few well-meaning individuals, or wide pread organisations with a lot of capital?
comment in response to
post
We visited the UK last month, and last(-ish) minute, we got reminded that we needed a passport.
Crazy to need one for a train ride, tbh.
comment in response to
post
The problem is that I (and many other people in my position) have an urge where it's hard to resist pointing out obvious (to us) things.
Much of this "engagement baitey" content preys in that.
comment in response to
post
Jacqeus anus
comment in response to
post
The irony that this sounds very islamophobic
comment in response to
post
And the moment you get home, there's only energy left to just sit down.
comment in response to
post
If it's loud enough, a man will enter your room to tell you to smile.
comment in response to
post
Well, as a fellow arts person. It might not always be as appreciated to alter someone's artistic vision. Especially without asking.
I know I'd quickly see it as criticism.
An "I thought your work wasn't good enough, so I 'fixed' it" if you will.
comment in response to
post
Damn, just keep some space for a taxidermy horse that might or might not arrive soon.
comment in response to
post
Well, I'm an open borders (abolishionist even) kind of person. 🤷♂️
So I don't care as much about that question as you'd want.
comment in response to
post
I'm not from the US, I don't know which specific organisations you talk about. Seems contradictory indeed, I agree.
I imagine it might have to with the US having a high "demand" in national pride, and it'd be to get popularity 🤷♂️ not that I'd agree on such populistic methods.
comment in response to
post
It can't by essence, really. It'd be a bit of an oxymoron. One is grounded on equity, and the other differentiates people based on their nationality. They don't blend all too well.
That's why socialists are generally against nationalism. There's no real place for that in a socialist structure.
comment in response to
post
You do seem to be trolling indeed. You are kind of JAQing off (look it up if you're unfamiliar)
I'll assume you're indeed just curious, hence why I still respond (even if it's a bit obnoxious)
What do you mean by "the national question"?
comment in response to
post
...
I see you have hatebreed pinned. I love the HC scene, they're very political, and (most of them) pretty cool.
Let's leave it at that.
comment in response to
post
You're spending this much time just to find a gotcha moment, are we?
Look, I'll leave it at this, you've got to be skeptical of everyone (skeptical is not contrarian, like you're being) especially people you agree with, else you're easily susceptible to having a too strong bias.
...
comment in response to
post
Well then, does that change my point?
Nationalism suck, didn't specify which nation.
comment in response to
post
What about them?
comment in response to
post
You could make that point. I wouldn't advocate for any inflexible dogma. This is just one of them. And it's one of the most common and widespread one.
comment in response to
post
How it narrows someone's thinking and makes people take zero accountability. Anything that's wrong can and will be blamed on outsiders. Any success will equally be wrongly allocated to "the good team."
An oversimplification of current issues, and any "solutions" based on it are no solutions at all.
comment in response to
post
I know you're just JAQing off here, but if you only care about what affects you personally, you're a pretty crap person.
comment in response to
post
Honestly, just knowing how harmful it is (both for people who support it and around them) is a good start.
And knowing to spot the signals around the people you care about.
That's it really
comment in response to
post
Both
comment in response to
post
You dream of thinking of it maybe being balanced in the future.
Then you come back to reality.
comment in response to
post
Booze-da-da-mmm-rum-na-da-ee-da
comment in response to
post
Oh, I didn't realise this one needed any explaining. And with your own ackchually-ing you'd be in ok both jokes 🤷♂️
comment in response to
post
The sensible thing would also be to deduct which one is altered to set any doubt asside.
Photoshop, no matter how well done, leaves traces.
Else, we can alter any image and claim to not use either, for whatever purpose, on purpose.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for your unbiased contribution to this topic, trump-maga-45-47
comment in response to
post
Here too, must have to do something with them being heralds of the apocalypse or whatnot.
comment in response to
post
Well.. maybe they are a collection of fungi, working symbiotically together to function as one whole.
Then, one person could be multiple fungi.
comment in response to
post
I hope Candy got a cute outfit, too.
comment in response to
post
Well, thanks for confirming that you don't get the "smart" part of the "work smarter, not harder" proverb.
comment in response to
post
Well, I know..
But.. it's really hard to ignore people who spew harmful rethoric.
Don't want them to feel like they have no opposition, either.
comment in response to
post
I love public transport (concept) and take it every day. But this is also me in public transport.
Well, more étiquette than rules, so even fewer people follow it..