Profile avatar
darko.io
🏴⩜ 🏴‍☠️ 🧑‍💻 CottageCore WebDev 🚀 DevRel @supertokens.com | Co-founder @wts.rocks 💻 Linux, FOSS, The web platform & JavaScript ❤️ SolidJS and Astro
144 posts 460 followers 154 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Try "The Broken Empire" trilogy if you haven't already :) It ticks the first three, but it's a bit different. The protagonist isn't exactly the heroic kind, although he arguably has some good reasons for that :)
comment in response to post
Then go ahead and do more of it :) Stages, streams, blogs, whatever await :)
comment in response to post
👌 Bonus points for the amazing soundtrack on this one. And I don't even like gnr 🤣
comment in response to post
🔗 https://dub.sh/LCgYjhU 🎟️ And here's a discount code to use at checkout: "DARKO25"
comment in response to post
The modern day xkcd.com/303/
comment in response to post
Using it via roocode.com (in vscode), for anyone wondering :)
comment in response to post
🤣 Just today? 🤣🤣🤣 See you at @cityjsconf.bsky.social 😁
comment in response to post
3. While at it, I realized I could improve relatinator with a BM25 matcher instead of plain ol' TF-IDF. 4. One thing lead to another, it's late February. I still don't like year-in-reviews too much, but I have plenty to be thankful for, so 🤷‍♂️
comment in response to post
1. I'm not a fan of year-in-reviews 2. I borked my relatinator tool (github.com/DBozhinovsk...) , due to some changes in Astro 5, so I had to fix that 👇
comment in response to post
Try this youtu.be/a1KJpfkgGQ8?... The pasta isn't that important, but the cooking technique... aaaamazing 👌
comment in response to post
Well, for the first kind of people, I usually love pointing out that CSS is, in fact, Turing-complete: stackoverflow.com/questions/24... For the second kind you mention, doesn't that questions apply to "proper" programming languages too? You can just swap CSS with JS in that statement :D
comment in response to post
Also, possibly the deeply misguided "CSS in not programming" fallacy, causing them to avoid learning it properly 🤷‍♂️
comment in response to post
Thanks 😁 I'll pass it to our web team 😄
comment in response to post
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 This one gets framed.
comment in response to post
Can confirm :) It just takes a bit of your sanity away :D
comment in response to post
Proud hoarder. But an organized one 😁 I'm basically using my browser for project management 😅
comment in response to post
About 12, just last week alone 🤣
comment in response to post
TIL - I'm a conference 🤯 But we should make a WTS profile here, don't we 🤔
comment in response to post
Preach 💯
comment in response to post
Let's 😁 While I don't expect them to fix every problem WCs have, they should at least help adoption.
comment in response to post
Yeah, that one's fun. I usually rule it on the spot when I'm DM-ing, depending on the situation.
comment in response to post
But, being a part of a team that is used to React, likes doing React... you're not gonna have an easy time convincing them to accept something as the native WC DX. But, there are ways to provide at least some of the DX, while still producing WCs on the other end 🤷‍♂️
comment in response to post
Can't disagree with that - I love the _idea_ of web components, that's not the issue at all. The native DX is not that great - especially in a world where we have stuff like JSX (and the likes). This is of course, very biased. 👇
comment in response to post
darko.io/posts/futur... AKA - web components: the Toyota Corolla of webdev. Not shiny, but it will outlast your framework. For better or worse.