daveblend.bsky.social
Avid.
1,289 posts
78 followers
132 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
You fucking clowns
comment in response to
post
"Policies" is a super cool euphemism for "crimes."
comment in response to
post
Great context dudes. Love how you (didn't bother to) mention the specific unconstitutional horrors the protests were actually about.
comment in response to
post
How hard is it to say he reversed course (undeniable) after Israel failed to pay heed to his wishes (also undeniable)? No idea what you think you do for a living, but it's not journalism.
comment in response to
post
He literally said he was against an Israeli airstrike the day before it happened, you idiots.
comment in response to
post
What the fuck is this? Padilla wasn't "mixing it up" over "immigration". He asked a question about a military invasion of an American city and was assaulted for it. You think this shit is cute? A "trend"? A fucking meme?
comment in response to
post
Given your bothsidesing, I'm not even convinced the New York Times "knows" America isn't supposed to have kings.
comment in response to
post
Incredible song though. I listen to it and pretend he's singing in Italian.
comment in response to
post
And yet you still haven't run a front-page story about the Trump administration's stated goal of using the military to effectuate regime change of democratically elected leaders in American cities and states. Seems like maybe that's PRETTY FUCKING IMPORTANT CONTEXT for these protests?
comment in response to
post
Yesterday, the Homeland Security Secretary literally declared that the mission of the US military in California was regime change of democratically elected officials, and this was the headline you went with. It's not just the sniping of the very online. You really are complicit.
comment in response to
post
Is his name Pro Football Hall of Famer War On Moon?
comment in response to
post
When they're made to stop. That's kind of how it works with authoritarians.
comment in response to
post
Refund the police!
comment in response to
post
She also proclaimed the US military an occupying army that wouldn't leave California until it replaced its democratically elected leaders. Impeach her.
comment in response to
post
This is not what outrage sounds like.
comment in response to
post
Is this one of the accountability stories you were talking about, @ericlipton.nytimes.com? This blurb doesn't suggest holding anyone accountable for anything.
The DHS Secretary just declared a policy of leadership replacement by military force. In California. The case is made, don't ya think?
comment in response to
post
Hilarious that the AP describes Trump's efforts as if he were making an earnest attempt at "inroads," as opposed to crassly taking advantage without ever offering anything.
comment in response to
post
It's not a "catch." It's a flagrant violation of 1A rights. The anodyne phrasing isn't surprising, given the Times hasn't bothered posting about the Homeland Security Secretary declaring federal government policy in California is removal of democratically elected leadership via military occupation.
comment in response to
post
That's one way to keep Trump out of the Pentagon.
comment in response to
post
He's spoken very openly about the dangers of getting pickled.
comment in response to
post
Thanks, it's super helpful to treat the thoughts of willfully ignorant assholes as valid.
comment in response to
post
They've been publicly split for years. It's amounted to absolutely nothing. Your failure to note the feebleness of anti-Trump dissent in literally any context is... just another failure of your coverage.
comment in response to
post
Is that what he's doing when he's suppressing dissent through unconstitutional deployment of the military, @adamwren.bsky.social? "Leaning in as Commander in Chief"?
comment in response to
post
My god take a stand ffs.
comment in response to
post
He's correct. And your publication is endangering America by reducing Newsom's stance to entry in a "meme war." As if the stakes were mere clicks, and not the future of the country.
comment in response to
post
He said anyone who protests will be met with "very big force." Stop making him sound like a sane adult. And stop omitting phrases like "In open defiance of the Constitution..." from your headlines. This is not, in the long run, good for free markets. Or your souls.
comment in response to
post
It'd probably be a lot more expensive if he was paying for their room and board.