davidmluebke.bsky.social
Historian of the Reformation, early modern world, social movements, uprisings. Helped create the permanent exhibition at Holocaust Museum in DC, ages ago. Union activist. Amateur cook and photographer. Opinions are my own, RT ≠ endorsement. 💙🌊
3,032 posts
10,579 followers
1,772 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
www.pguards.net/services
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
The article offers no information, either way. But I also think that we should welcome those who have had a change of heart. The right owes a lot of its strength to welcoming former adversaries into their fold; the opposition can and, in my view, should do the same.
comment in response to
post
Now the Bannon / Kirk wing of MAGA is in a lather over Tr•mp's failure to restrain Netanyahu.
www.alternet.org/trump/trump-...
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Strictly speaking, Axios is reporting that Israeli diplomats are suggesting that Trump was faking his own foreign policy vis-à-vis Iran. I would not dismiss that scenario out of hand, but it does require us to believe that the entire negotiation around Iran's nukes has been an elaborate feint.
comment in response to
post
If I were capable of feeling sorry for Rubio, I would worry about him now.
comment in response to
post
But Iran and its allies (Hezbollah, the Houthis) are weak; there is little that Iran can do to retaliate other than the usual skirmishing with drones or warships.
comment in response to
post
And because Bibi knows that no U.S. president since George H.W. Bush has been willing to punish Israel when it acts against U.S. wishes, he knows he has veto power over the Iran deal. The price is that Israel is now in a state of open war with Iran.
comment in response to
post
Fortunately for Bibi, in Season One, Trump was only too happy to oblige, so an airstrike was unnecessary. So far, Season Two has played out differently, with Rubio struggling to repair what Trump destroyed, though without acknowledging it. In both senses, Bibi dropped a bomb on their plan.
comment in response to
post
Rubio has been trying to negotiate a deal with Iran that would set verifiable limits on its nuclear program; had he succeeded, the result would have been a deal very much like the one Obama negotiated and Trump nixed in his first term. Bibi, famously, did not like that deal either.
comment in response to
post
Trump's latest poop on TruthSocial read to me like the bark of braggart who has lost control of a situation but feels compelled to insist that he remains fully in charge. He did a similar thing yesterday when he hinted that he might relent on ICE roundups of farm workers and hotel housekeepers.
comment in response to
post
I'm trying to figure out from what I've seen so far whether or not the U.S. military actively coordinated with Israel in launching this airstrike -- as the Jerusalem Post suggested. The JP isn't exactly a mouthpiece for Bibi, as far I know, but it's not hard to add up why they would this to be true.
comment in response to
post
Absolutely. The word "involvement" has been doing a lot of work in this exchange: if by that one means "morally and strategically implicated in everything Bibi does," then yes: Trump and the U.S. were involved. And so was every president going back to JFK, arguably even Ike.
comment in response to
post
Indeed not. On the other hand, he often lies.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, saw that. I'm not entirely convinced that he is telling the truth, though.
comment in response to
post
Damn
comment in response to
post
Thanks for the shout-out, Clay! 💙💙
comment in response to
post
"...it reduces Jewish identity to a political litmus test – one that erases the rich diversity of Jewish thought and experience. This erasure has real consequences for Jewish students and faculty who don’t conform to Harvard’s preferred stereotype."
comment in response to
post
"The same principle applies when universities assume all Jewish people share identical views about Israel and Zionism. When Harvard treats criticisms of Israeli violence as antisemitism or of Israel as a state for Jews above the other people who live there..."
comment in response to
post
“These assumptions aren’t just empirically wrong – they’re legally dangerous. As the US supreme court established in Students for Fair Admissions, universities cannot operate on the 'belief that minority students always express some characteristic minority viewpoint on any issue'.”
#Edusky
comment in response to
post
"This narrative relies on three false assumptions: that Jewish communities hold monolithic pro-Israel views, that Jewish students cannot tolerate different perspectives on Israel-Palestine, and that exposure to criticism of Israel constitutes a civil rights injury."
#Israel
#Palestine
comment in response to
post
The total bill for the entire project, including the research to which he refers, is not “tens of millions” but $10,451,439.
#Hegseth
#StupidTwit