docmark.bsky.social
Well, after thinking about it for a long time, I don't have much to say for myself. Maybe later...
995 posts
116 followers
5 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Congress won't do it. As long as they don't feel threatened in any way by public reaction they'll just dance around and continue to disassemble the entire U. S.
comment in response to
post
Are you sure?
comment in response to
post
Might have been checking how sharp you were, not actually asking advice. Tough to say from a bluesky post.
comment in response to
post
They're going to pass it - they're just trying to pick a good time to minimize an adverse reaction.
comment in response to
post
Yepper.
comment in response to
post
If all people do is talk, nothing changes either.
comment in response to
post
The Constitution is the law. It's not being enforced.
comment in response to
post
And if he cancels them, what do we do?
comment in response to
post
Let's say the public doesn't tolerate it. What do they do?
comment in response to
post
'It' maybe? If using 'he' is biased, is using 'she' less biased in some way?
comment in response to
post
Mat want to try Laura Nyro too.
comment in response to
post
Steve Miller?
comment in response to
post
So what's the latest on the budget reconciliation bill?
comment in response to
post
Not anytime soon. In the longer term, only if it fills the same needs and provides the same satisfaction.
comment in response to
post
Do it!
comment in response to
post
When you're done ranting there's a mental health hotline you can try. Let me know ho it works out for you, and thanks in advance.
comment in response to
post
Can he charge those who did it with false arrest?
comment in response to
post
So?
comment in response to
post
Now there's an incisive and convincing reply!
comment in response to
post
... you seem to be yet another dedicated, self-righteous fanatic trying to use proof by assertion. To be blunt, you certainly don't have the insight to avoid that mistake. Just pointing that out.
comment in response to
post
Take state police, lots of them, with you to enforce your rights.
comment in response to
post
Why 'request' if it's a legal responsibility? Why aren't ICE agents subject to arrest by the state if they violates state or federal law?
comment in response to
post
They're likely concerned that the 2024 election is coming under scrutiny, so it's time to distract, misdirect, and obfuscate again.
comment in response to
post
Lol
comment in response to
post
I'd guess that you're not in a position to know.
comment in response to
post
LAPD being allowed to act as they do is evidence that the LA government is a gang, Reminds me of Richard Daley's Chicago.
comment in response to
post
There's no virtue in these people. None at all.
comment in response to
post
Hope it stays that way.
comment in response to
post
Difficult to say who you're replying to. Focus!
comment in response to
post
So...where are the city police? Why is the city allowing agents to break the law?
comment in response to
post
I've been gone a long time - there's a lot of it I miss.
comment in response to
post
At last!
comment in response to
post
Democrats are funded by the same money that funds Heritage and MAGA, and bought the Roberts court
comment in response to
post
The Luigi thing is an interesting event - the most recognizable eyebrows on the planet exposed for all to see.
comment in response to
post
Very possible...
comment in response to
post
I believe the military looked sloppy because they wanted to - forced to parade for a collection of slimeballs.
comment in response to
post
Trump is enabled by the Roberts court, the MAGA Congress, the the billionaires who guide the administration through Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action, and Rupert Murdoch's Fox New. The public is deliberately and forcefully shut out.
comment in response to
post
Trump will pardon him as soon as he thinks he can get away with it if he's allowed to live.
comment in response to
post
Let's hear it for your police!
comment in response to
post
Yes it is a crime syndicate.
comment in response to
post
Our telling them not to worry about it. When soldiers are forced to act improperly they tend to show absolute minimum efficiency.
comment in response to
post
Tell me again again how the Republicans swept the 2024 election. I may have some questions.
comment in response to
post
So here's a dilemma: If he's not executed, and quickly, Trump will pardon him and he'll be back on the streets.
comment in response to
post
Enforcement is necessary.
comment in response to
post
The two Bushes appointed the first three of the Roberts court, W after he was given Florida by his brother, the Governor.
comment in response to
post
Capitalizing on the public response rather than leading it.
comment in response to
post
If that's the Harvard twit Roberts, he's much smaller that illustrated.
comment in response to
post
Thise administration encourages it. It's call 'intimidation'.