doktorpeace.bsky.social
31, they/them
Icon by @wingupingu
1,409 posts
175 followers
74 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
give the option of the aspect ratio of the N-Gage port
comment in response to
post
Genuine question do we expand the fov for the advance games or just keep it as is.
comment in response to
post
This character in a crossover fighter would be like unleashing an apex predator on a wild deer population. I NEED to see her annihilating dudes.
comment in response to
post
It's got such a ripe bed of options on both sides. Sega's not had a crossover fighter like this before and it has 1,000,000 deep cuts that would genuinely make for incredible fighting game picks, alongside the obvious ones like Kiryu and the VF gang.
comment in response to
post
well ''''villains'''' in Shadow's case, you know what I mean.
comment in response to
post
Also, and this is just my take as a Mega Man fan. But I honestly think the MvCI selection of X/Zero/Sigma perfectly represents Mega Man already. Yeah there's a bunch of other subseries but, like, c'mon.
comment in response to
post
Luke, Jamie, and Kimberly are your new 'Big 3'? Okay, show it. Have 2 or 3 of them and neither Ryu or Chun.
Also yeah I'm repping Sonic only with villains cause, frankly, I think Sonic and friends largely would be kinda boring. Shadow, Metal, and Robotnik have incredible sauce potential though.
comment in response to
post
This is insanely radical. The government could announce a blatantly unconstitutional action such as ending birthright citizenship and strip people of their citizenship unless they each individually sue. Class actions are possible but they could take weeks to months to certify and seek relief.
comment in response to
post
Sotomayor issues a blistering dissent that states plainly that this decision renders constitutional protections meaningless.
comment in response to
post
It's not hyperbole to call this case the death of meaningful constitutional rights in the United States. If you do not have an attorney that can litigate against the government, you no longer have rights. This will go down in history as the gutting of the constitutional order.
comment in response to
post
In a blistering dissent by Sotomayor, she paints the reality that this holding has no limiting principle and the objection was literally to the mention of LGBTQ people existing. There's no limit to how far this decision will be taken by lower courts.
comment in response to
post
Alito writing this decision is a worst case scenario. What Sotomayor touches on here is the point. They want to make public schools unmanageable to gut them and end public education. This is a feature, not a bug of this decision.