dragonlou.bsky.social
Happily retired. Love outrigger paddling, truth, integrity and a good sense of humour. Woke is awake. Stay woke. ABC. YYC. NDP. No DMs. You can search your own content by typing “from:me” and then whatever related word you want in the search bar.
250 posts
1,256 followers
1,637 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to
post
Doug Ford still giving Musk $100M taxpayer dollars?
comment in response to
post
Your title of the show is INFURIATING!!!!!
Call it “What Canadians think of trump’s threats to annex a sovereign nation.”
Read the room, Ian.
comment in response to
post
This is what you've done, @ianhanomansing.bsky.social
You are a Vichy.
comment in response to
post
The framing is so inappropriate and begs the question. Imagine asking, "What say you? Is it time to revisit and renew Canada's residential school system?" Or asking, "How do you feel about rape as a tool of war? Is it a policy the modern Canadian military should embrace in the post-MeToo era?"
comment in response to
post
Again, gaslighting.
Your original wording manifestly did not measure up.
Diving straight into the martyr act without admitting you screwed up shows lack of integrity. Speaking as one of the people who values and defends the CBC, you're not making that work any easier.
bsky.app/profile/mark...
comment in response to
post
Your CBC radio promos running as of *one hour ago* are asking people to discuss what “Canada as the 51st state means to you.” So maybe the problem isn’t us jumping to conclusions, but the things you’ve been saying to promote this episode, and how you’re acting as if it’s merely an interesting topic.
comment in response to
post
The threat of annexation is illegal & you're co-hosting with the country that's doing the threatening? Good god man. Soft-languaging a clear threat with words like proposal? Fix this. The threat is to destroy Canada. The "gap" is created by you. This is an existential threat to Canada. Frame that.
comment in response to
post
I hope @ianhanomansing.bsky.social that the first point you bring up is that annexation of another country is against international law. The rest of the convo follows from that, ex: why do you think it’s ok to violate international law? www.lawnow.org/annexation-a...