dranpingchen.bsky.social
plant and ecosystem ecologist @ Colorado State University, nature enthusiast. https://apchenecologylab.weebly.com
46 posts
1,592 followers
167 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Welcome to 1984
comment in response to
post
I'd like to be included. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
The PDF link provided by Katherine is still downable. I can email you a copy of it still not working.
comment in response to
post
Thanks! Saved a copy while the PDF is still available.
comment in response to
post
Thanks, Katherine. Never a fan of large labs at the size of 40-60 people if they are primarily grads and postdocs. Running a research lab is different than running a business, I guess.
comment in response to
post
A lab that employs 40-60 people??
comment in response to
post
Do you mean this 2011 Science paper? www.science.org/doi/full/10....
comment in response to
post
Yes, reading is curing! I have a one-book-per-month reading plan since December.
comment in response to
post
Stay warm and safe, Josh!!
comment in response to
post
So cool! At FoCo? It's a pity to miss it!
comment in response to
post
Thank you!
comment in response to
post
I'd like to be included. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
Congrats, Josh (and Andrew)!!
comment in response to
post
Thanks, John. I found out that I needed to click "modules" first to see course survey.
comment in response to
post
I have taught multiple courses but never received any review comments... couldn't find course survey button on my Canvas courses?
comment in response to
post
I think for most well known institutions, institutional emails are quite reliable. Non-institutional emails, if published in their papers, are also fine. One thing is that if a person changes their institutions recently, the email addresses we find from their papers may be outdated.
comment in response to
post
I usually check publications for which they are the corresponding authors.
comment in response to
post
Hi Tim, I am a fire ecologist and would like to be included. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
Yes, I'd like to join. Thanks.
comment in response to
post
Cool idea! Maybe it should rely on self-supplied publication list (or Google Scholar page) to generate COI. (Don't tell me you published 400 papers over the past 48 months.) This can reduce false positives e.g. due to sharing the same name with other researchers.
comment in response to
post
Would love to be included. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
Impressive!!
comment in response to
post
Could you include me? Thanks!