drleonj.bsky.social
Black dogs, orange cats, and manuscripts. Professor @ USC. I write about African American life in early national and antebellum Boston.
255 posts
239 followers
268 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Off to read the whole thing! :)
comment in response to
post
Off to read now . . .
comment in response to
post
You mean like this?
comment in response to
post
its, not it’s - that autocorrect error more or less makes my point
comment in response to
post
Once AI (or user generated) errors enter online databases or (god help us) LLMs, they will proliferate and sediment. Then, too, transcriptions of any kind obliterate the materiality of the handwritten and it’s evidential freight. (Pls chime in here @markalanmattes.bsky.social and #bookhistory peeps)
comment in response to
post
I personally think that this is a terrible idea. Paleography entails a complex set of often highly localized, idiosyncratic, and situational skills. Even crowdsourced transcription projects (with boot camp training) have questionable quality control. Using AI would imperil learning those skills imho
comment in response to
post
Absolutely pathetic
comment in response to
post
I’m so sorry, Jocelyn. That’s just so hard. Se ding you and your mom healing vibes.
comment in response to
post
I had one of those, or a similar Tandy model. You booted it -slooowly- with several discs. Green crt screen. Thanks for making me feel old!
comment in response to
post
In scholarly terms, that’s a ‘tan suit’ level indiscretion.
comment in response to
post
1827, sorry
comment in response to
post
Here are some letters from 1828 mailed from Rainsford Island in the Boston harbor during a smallpox outbreak. The letters have been ‘sterilized’ with smoke, clearly visible, and stamped ‘quarantined’ in red. I might have held my breath when I read them!
comment in response to
post
Mishmish has just started drafting an amicus brief!
comment in response to
post
Poor Pancakes!
comment in response to
post
The cruelty's the point. Nothing more, nothing less.
comment in response to
post
I don't think they've been written about before. They were in a box labeled 'Early City Council Committees & Other Department Records.' I was looking for/at something entirely different when I ran across them, but that's just so often the way when doing archival research.
comment in response to
post
I’d be completely remiss if I didn’t mention Al von Frank’s magnificent book on the Burns rendition. It’s a fantastic read 🗃️
comment in response to
post
Aww, man ☹️
comment in response to
post
They felt timely. Thank you for making the comparison the other day; it's really stuck with me.
comment in response to
post
As @bjmquinn.bsky.social @aearhart.bsky.social @adamrothman.bsky.social and others have suggested, the Burns rendition served to radicalize people who were on the fence about anti-slavery activism, and one can only hope that the same is true today of our own perilous situation. History matters 🗃️
comment in response to
post
These records from @archives.boston.gov are the receipts delivered from military companies to the city for their expenses in enforcing Burns' rendition. Like the ICE raids and the impending military parade, this was a scandalous waste of money too. The $13k claimed = $499,305.22 today's money! 🗃️
comment in response to
post
Different strokes, I guess. I just love thinking about how disciplinary conversations unfold: what questions get asked, what theoretical assumptions underlie them, how the discovery of archival sources, or ways of interpreting them, can completely change how we frame a topic. What’s not to like?
comment in response to
post
The only sad thing here is that he’s responding to a screenshot of a Tw*tter post, the author of which will likely never read it. Amazing thread, though!
comment in response to
post
Mister, you just earned yourself another follower. That was a *virtuosic* use of social media.
comment in response to
post
Historiography isn't irritating! It's awesome and fascinating!
comment in response to
post
Black Bostonians! (But you already knew that 😊)
comment in response to
post
That was my favorite one, that or Space Mountain. The outside rides were too scary for me, unless it was sitting in a teacup!
comment in response to
post
The first strategy worked really well for Paine in Common Sense ("I have heard it asserted by some") altho he did end getting disinterred and his body misplaced, so maybe there's less choice than I initially though!
comment in response to
post
This skeet to you by Mike and Ike’s and coffee?
comment in response to
post
I was always taught to imagine the worst (legitimate) critique of one’s book, and then mention that criticism in the intro. “It will be objected by some that . . .” as a way of preempting it. Or you could lodge it in your heart and take it to your grave! Decisions, decisions! 🤷🏻♂️
comment in response to
post
Thanks so much! That's a really interesting case study -- deeply researched and well-written -- but I'm looking for something more specifically focused on deceit and dissimulation as a practice.
comment in response to
post
That sound horrific! I hope that you make a complete recovery!
comment in response to
post
Thank you for sharing all the amazing music, though. It really does help! 🙏🏻
comment in response to
post
So very much, yes, but I’d much rather be right where I am, minus the fascism ☹️
comment in response to
post
Thank you! I’ll definitely check it out!
comment in response to
post
I've already Wyatt-Brown, Genovese, and Kenneth Greenberg on this subject, but I'm looking for something more analytic than illustrative. TIA!
comment in response to
post
I’m heartbroken for you and your colleagues. I wrote my book during a year-long NEH grant, and I wouldn’t be where I am or who I am without its support. I’m sending you all the vibes.
comment in response to
post
I hope you also plan on discussing that outstanding dogger.
comment in response to
post
At this point, I’ll take democracy saving anything . . .