drmandl.bsky.social
10 posts
4 followers
0 following
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I can hear arguments on the others, but that no-call before Lundell’s goal was baffling considering how low the bar has been to call high sticks the other way.
comment in response to
post
I’m generally a person who thinks conspiracy theories are for the feeble-minded to wrap their heads around truths they cannot possibly understand.
But the “Colin Campbell is throwing weight so his son’s team can win” theory has felt like it had legs this spring.
comment in response to
post
Every time I think I can’t take more as a Wild fan, I remember that the Maple Leafs exist.
comment in response to
post
Finley is our only Jr forward now?
comment in response to
post
There we are. Okay, I figured I was missing one of them.
comment in response to
post
I did have Bruno in mind. Makes me wonder which forward I’m not thinking of. 5 or 6 incoming freshmen at forward?
comment in response to
post
Do I have it right that the /currently confirmed/ roster for next year is at 25 (16F, 7D, 2G) for now?
(Pending House settlement roster limits, only room for maybe one player from the portal)
comment in response to
post
2. Why did Hegseth copy war planning information from the military computer systems onto a Signal chat?
3. Hegseth needs to explain why he thought all those people needed the war plans? On MSNBC Goldberg indicated the Sec of Treasury was in the chat…. Why?
comment in response to
post
There was a similar moment in January when Wisconsin was 10-12-2, but because of their abysmal OT record you could say they had a .5139 win%.
Didn’t matter since Wisc. crashed out in February, but the question about if OT games have the 2/3 and 1/3 weighting applies here as it does in the RPI.
comment in response to
post
This year has made me wonder what the .500 record requirement for an at-large actually means.
Michigan is 18-15-3. But, because they went 6-1 in OT games, that actually translates to .4954 win% if you weigh those OT games the same as the RPI does.
So… is there an argument that Mich. is ineligible?