dstainer.bsky.social
Chicago sports fan, developer and dad of 2 teen girls.
26 posts
42 followers
119 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Minnesota has a chance to do something absolutely hilarious…
comment in response to
post
This is the key question in my mind, how accurate is that training cost number. If it is, then what the hell have we been doing. My guess is that the model was cheaper overall but not by the magnitude presented.
comment in response to
post
I agree with your general premise. However, I think the major short term concern is if the numbers are accurate as to the cost to train the model (~$6 mil) then why does META need to drop $65 billion this year to achieve subpar results to Deepseek and what if that gets cut and everyone else follows?
comment in response to
post
Based on some Blind posts it might be having an affect. Note: from the other site and not my content
comment in response to
post
Please no
comment in response to
post
Tim Tebow jump pass
comment in response to
post
He shouldn’t. I think the biggest question at this point is who is Ben Johnson’s D-coordinator gonna be next year.
comment in response to
post
So happy to see Andy posting here, missed his content when I stopped going to the other place.
comment in response to
post
You are right, it’s probably the most unifying topic in the state. But something has to be done to increase the housing supply. You want to keep people in their homes, but second homes or rentals should be taxed at market rate IMO.
comment in response to
post
One idea I’ve always thought would be a reasonable compromise for CA’s prop 13, would be to keep it as is for primary residence, but allow for yearly assessment for non-primary residences.
Let those who need shelter have consistent payments while vacation homes be taxed according to their values