eadeli.bsky.social
Assistant Prof at Stanford, Director of Stanford Translational AI (STAI) Lab
Computer Vision, Computational Neuroscience
37 posts
794 followers
131 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Just to clarify, sometime a disrespectful email from the AC to the reviewer can be considered as a form on punishment! 😉
Also to further clarify, I have AC/SAC roles in conferences these days, but have seen such emails sent to my colleagues!
comment in response to
post
I agree with your note. I am just trying to put myself in the shoes of someone who is seeing this unfolding, from outside!!
comment in response to
post
Indeed. At this scale, we are in dire need of better tooling.
comment in response to
post
But, Christian, I want to also argue: if this is all volentary work, how do we justify punishing late/no-show reviewers? So are we saying late-reviewers are bad, but it is ok for PCs/ACs/SACs to be late because this volentary?
comment in response to
post
And if you professionalize this, there is the risk of incentivising revenue and money-making, and losing the entire community, like how some open access and predatory journals are acting now! (outsourcing is even worse, because they don't understand the value of the science being published!)
comment in response to
post
This was the team that created recommendations on how to properly evaluate AI models to get software as a medical device approvals.
comment in response to
post
All training sessions in my study section for cancelled for this and next week. And the SRO said she cannot answer any questions at the moment!!! What a shitshow!
comment in response to
post
Congrats 👏
comment in response to
post
😂 actually did it just once. Surprisingly good!
comment in response to
post
Bluesky it is!
comment in response to
post
Amazing! This is great to hear.
comment in response to
post
During #ICLR2024 rebuttal, the reviewers figured out they were looking for the wrong thing, but instead of adjusting their review scores, they lowered their confidence! They refer us to our own cited/published previous work (note, review was double blind) to consult that paper.
comment in response to
post
Great list. Relevant to my work.
comment in response to
post
Great list! Relevant!
comment in response to
post
@neuroamyo.bsky.social great pack. Aligned with my research. Thanks
comment in response to
post
Great list. Always great to see you active on social media.