edward-weiss.bsky.social
19 posts
19 followers
23 following
Regular Contributor
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
AI would be my guess.
comment in response to
post
This isn't Klimt.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
"If" -- Who are we kidding?
comment in response to
post
It was already difficult to get through to Social Security on the phone, if there were any issues. This is going to be a real nightmare for the elderly.
comment in response to
post
Trump says conflicting things on a nonstop basis. You can't draw a conclusion from any single comment, or policy change. It could immediately be reversed.
comment in response to
post
What a jerk.
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately, talking to Trump and Vance is like talking to Putin and Lukashenko. Zelensky has no choice, but to stand up for Ukraine. There's no way to be diplomatic with them.
comment in response to
post
They could have an informal agreement, but a treaty must be ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate. They're not going to bring in US troops, so Trump's one tool is cutting off aid, and logistical support. Europe must stand up to Trump and Putin.
comment in response to
post
I'm glad he said it, but what is the GOP doing? We have a US President carrying out Russian foreign policy, working actively to perpetuate war crimes, and they've sat back and done nothing but enable this.
comment in response to
post
Sadly, we all know how this is going to play out. Trump/Musk will do whatever they want. My question is -- do they want a test case to show they control federal law enforcement, and are above the law, or would this be an inconvenience to them?