energyscholar.bsky.social
STEM geek & nature lover. Human rights are important. Totalitarianism is icky. Speak truth to power. Motivated by a search for truth.
1,814 posts
306 followers
272 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The trick, of course, is to use lots of shell organizations to launder the money & make it hard to track. That way Politico ( NPR, etc) can truthfully claim, "We don't get much money from USAID". Unsaid is that dozens of shell orgs hide where the money comes from.
This comic is the truth of it:
comment in response to
post
Sure. Great request. I'll start with an easy target, Politico.
Here's Politico defending its funding source, USAID:
www.politico.com/news/magazin...
Here's Politico unable to pay its bills after USAID funding is turned off:
wltreport.com/2025/02/04/u...
comment in response to
post
Say the guys taking payments from the fraudsters!
comment in response to
post
The people whose criminal fraud is being exposed are doing a TERRIFIC job of fighting back against the people exposing their fraud. Many people seem to be buying the deception, too!
comment in response to
post
Muting CIA propaganda bot CCR. Here's a summary of its instruction manual:
cryptome.org/2012/07/gent...
comment in response to
post
Hey, is this an ALLY of the CIA bot or just a confused person?
I ask because CIA propaganda bots operate in packs.
comment in response to
post
Andy clearly doesn't know much about this topic. General Brown has known for MONTHS that he was going to be fired. Since NOVEMBER.
www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cancelatio...
comment in response to
post
That "imbecile" sure did paddle the Democrats' behinds. They must be even less intelligent than "imbecile".
comment in response to
post
Hey, this CIA propaganda bot is spewing the usual CIA talking points. We've heard them before.
It fails to mention the CIA's 2014 coup d'etat against Ukraine's elected government, or how USA installed literal goose-stepping Nazis to positions of power & invited them to rape & kill ethnic Russians
comment in response to
post
That's PRECISELY what the current destruction of the Administrative State (AS) is about! It's all about forcing the AS to follow orders from its rightfully elected commander, the POTUS.
Yes, government should be afraid of the people!
So you SUPPORT what Trump & Musk are doing, right?
comment in response to
post
What's horrific?
That's standard work behavior. At the end of each week one writes up a summary of what one did at work, for the boss.
What's the problem here?
comment in response to
post
Precisely!
comment in response to
post
That bird has flown. Fascism came to America a long time ago.
comment in response to
post
"institutional journalists [sic] are doing the work"
LOL! Peter speaks as if institutional journalists can be trusted about ANYTHING. Peter seemingly hasn't figured out that they CONSTANTLY LIE.
Wow, some people are just cluelessly naive!
comment in response to
post
CIA-controlled propaganda bot detected!
CCR shares the opinion of the CIA. It's probably a paid propaganda account, as most real humans know the lies in what it just said.
comment in response to
post
Brown only knew the firing was coming since NOVEMBER!
Silly!
comment in response to
post
What makes you think I believe him? I said no such thing. Stop putting words in my mouth. Quit AssUMe ing things.
Most people have figured out by now that the Ukraine War was a ghastly deception foisted on us by warmongers. Some few pitiful brainwashed fools are still for that war.
comment in response to
post
Now you know the SURVIVAL RATE for those given the treatment versus the SURVIVAL RATE for those given standard of care. In that context, is the Abstract accurate or deceptive?
comment in response to
post
Carl, you've just been deceived by scientific fraud. AFTER I WARNED you that the study is fraudulent.
Carl, what's the SURVIVAL RATE for those given this treatment? How about for those not given this treatment.
Knowing the respective survival rates, would you want the treatment?
comment in response to
post
Observers, notice how Carl goes directly to personal insults. His attitude projects smug superiority. Carl's mind is made up, so don't confuse him with facts.
comment in response to
post
Are you upset with him because he was suckered by propaganda a few years ago, or because he's no longer deceived? Please explain.
comment in response to
post
You've done no such thing.
That sounds like, "No, I'm not willing to have a polite & thoughtful discussion"
Is that correct?
comment in response to
post
It's fraudulent, and clearly so. Anyone can spot the fraud. Yet it's not been retracted.
Pharma paid well for this FRAUDULENT science paper.
The literature is PACKED with fraudulent science.
comment in response to
post
Can you detect the fraud?
Published 2019 in JAMA:
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
Were you sick with sepsis would you want this treatment?
Hint: read only the ABSTRACT and it's a clear NO
Now read the Secondary Results section, buried around page 23, and ask yourself the same question.
comment in response to
post
Carl, I've read a LOT of Federally funded research, including thousands of scientific medical studies just in the past few years. My academic background is in Bio-Physics.
Lots of peer-reviewed science is flat out FRAUDULENT. I spot it all the time.
Here's my favorite FRAUDULENT science paper
comment in response to
post
I say the same to you, Carl!
Are you willing to have a polite, rational discussion where you explain your position and listen to mine? Or 'nah!' ?
comment in response to
post
Ahh, Miss Fanny is in the "Trust the science" crowd. "Trust the science" is an anti-scientific statement that perfectly summarizes ANTI-science. Real science is about observing, asking questions, and collecting data. As soon as "trust" gets involved it's not science.
comment in response to
post
Carl, you clearly have NOT been listening directly to him. You've clearly been listening to media reports ABOUT him, where they put words into his mouth.
What's your take on this 2 minute speech, Carl?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-xM...
comment in response to
post
Seriously, Carl? You believe Americans are unhealthy because of NOT ENOUGH regulation? You blame bad health on RELIGION?
You completely misdiagnose the problem.
Our health problems clearly stem from unhealthy stuff in our environment. Our regulators are CORRUPT. They are part of the problem.
comment in response to
post
Seriously, Michael? USA has a rich history of supporting dictators, overthrowing democratic governments, and waging regime change wars. USA never did the right thing. USA foreign policy was the evil against which righteous people fought.
What are you even thinking, Michael?
comment in response to
post
Lolz! Well said! I'm not wild about Luigi's choice of target, as his target was only #28 on my list.
While I'd like to see a pardon that's not realistic.
I'm hoping he gets off with a hung jury via Jury Nullification.
Now that I've answered your question, please answer mine.
comment in response to
post
Huh?
Carl, do you feel that Americans are generally healthy?
Do we get good value from our healthcare money?
Are we currently doing the right things for public health?
Should we keep doing the same things, since <sarcasm>they're working so well</sarcasm>.
comment in response to
post
So, Sherbear95, people are upset at those who EXPOSED criminal fraud but not at those who PERPETRATED the fraud.
Make that make sense.
comment in response to
post
"The hot takes have got it all wrong. It was classic Trump media trolling. He picked that fight on purpose. ...
He baited the hook, she took the bait, and Trump reeled her in."
It was a trick. Lynda took the bait, too!
www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cancelatio...
comment in response to
post
His TDS is showing. In a few years people will be ASHAMED of their TDS and will try to conceal it.
comment in response to
post
The German people have been BETRAYED by their politicians, their elites, and by their journalists. Germans' best option is to permanently eliminate their entire political class.
USA is no ALLY to Germany. USA blew up Germany's energy supply & lied about it. German pols did not complain.
comment in response to
post
Massive *** PAID *** Ukraine rally
There, fixed that for you.
comment in response to
post
That's an insult to cocksuckers everywhere! No one one wants to be associated with totalitarian tyrant Trudeau!
comment in response to
post
Umm, Rod, we're talking about the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For the past 80 years the entire point of this JOB is to kill those whom POTUS points at.
Sad but true. CONGRESS is supposed to authorize war but Congress last declared war in 1941.
comment in response to
post
"The hot takes have got it all wrong. It was classic Trump media trolling. He picked that fight on purpose. ...
He baited the hook, she took the bait, and Trump reeled her in."
www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cancelatio...
comment in response to
post
Carl could always CHECK WITH THE SOURCE and find out what's true and what's false. But no, Carl won't do that. Instead he'll remain willfully ignorant. If Carl did some research Carl might learn something that didn't match his preconceptions. Can't have that!
comment in response to
post
That sounds like an expression of intense hatred. Also deepest ignroance.
comment in response to
post
Brought to you by Pfizer!
The silly fools following this smear job have NO CLUE they are cheering for a paid Pfizer PR job.
comment in response to
post
No, Carl. I'm just better informed than you are. You've been lied to by your media sources and don't know it.
comment in response to
post
Carl gets EVERY ONE WRONG. Carl repeats the MEDIA DISTORTIONS and SMEAR JOBS. Carl obviously does NOT know his views, because Carl just got every one DEAD WRONG. Carl just made my point.
comment in response to
post
Rod, did you know that the previous administration EXTORTED Starlink to provide service to Ukraine? Musk opposed using Starlink for military purposes but he was given no choice in the matter. Shortly after that EXTORTION Musk switched to the Trump team.
www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cancelatio...
comment in response to
post
This is just pitiful. Compelled speech is for totalitarian tyrants. Are we supposed to cheer for totalitarian tyranny?
comment in response to
post
That's a PRETTY BASIC work requirement: send an email describing what you did in a week.
What kind of clown doesn't know that?