familybrief.bsky.social
Family Law Silk at 1KBW | Fellow of Chartered Institute of Arbitrators | PFDR evaluator | FRJ board | IAFL Fellow | Father of 3 | Long Distance Runner
Blog | https://familybrief.org/
285 posts
1,823 followers
203 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
It would be the end of everything. Thank god it’s definitely not possible under the constitution
comment in response to
post
Yes in theory- that would make a cracking ticket.
But I’m not sure it works constitutionally Obama/ Trump as VP could not succeed to presidency (re 12th amendment)
comment in response to
post
Drove me mad with the bureaucracy and home visits. Ended up buying cats privately over internet - which is exactly what the cat charities are trying to discourage
comment in response to
post
I think you’re right
comment in response to
post
That's a good idea. I'll look into it
comment in response to
post
Just snapped in two as I was putting it on. So much for Ede and Ravenscroft quality!
comment in response to
post
You would have been neighbours with Gilbert and George
comment in response to
post
I lived in Fournier St, next door to Christ Church, for 3 years when I was in my 20s. Breathtaking view as I walked home from Liverpool St. And before they renovated/ ruined the market.
comment in response to
post
Good point well made
comment in response to
post
Thank you Esther!
comment in response to
post
Thank you
comment in response to
post
Wonderful news Adam. Hugh congratulations.
And best of all, you'll never have to complete that form again
comment in response to
post
The sheer optimism and excitement of the revolutions of 1989-1994 starting with Berlin ending with the first free elections in South Africa
comment in response to
post
I am in burpee hell
comment in response to
post
The question wasn’t what is the challenge
comment in response to
post
I also got it as an Xmas present!
comment in response to
post
Cape Town
comment in response to
post
DHL stadium in Cape Town.
comment in response to
post
Yes, that's a perfectly good answer. White v White is generally considered as a watershed in the law, with its themes developed in other HL/ SC cases (e.g. Miller; McFarlane, Radmacher).
comment in response to
post
Strange how ChatGPT could produce such a different and fictitious alternative…