fatalisme-actif.bsky.social
221 posts
233 followers
606 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Could someone please translate? What is he saying?
comment in response to
post
Not cool, but still better than shaming a wage worker in the way you did
comment in response to
post
when you lack the most basic ability to distinguish between somewhat bad and extremely bad, you lost the plot
comment in response to
post
No respect intended: you sound like an idiot
comment in response to
post
He’s on way harder drugs, makes more sense
comment in response to
post
How come “the interests of society” are always identical to what these specific dudes want?
comment in response to
post
Oh my god, Mr Milchick is a genius, so I’m not surprised to hear this
comment in response to
post
A parent business knowing what I spend at a child business that never asked me to share my data in a separate app with the parent? Yes. I would want to be asked first.
comment in response to
post
Worst type of reply to uncovering a fuckery that shouldn’t exist
comment in response to
post
a FANTASTIC one!
comment in response to
post
You’re playing with fire. You might get the result you want in the moment but they will (rightfully) despise you for it long term.
comment in response to
post
This is one of the most beautiful wedding photos ever!
comment in response to
post
“Vance cynically chose to betray his true values”— why assume that the values he promoted at the start were his true values? This guy will say and do anything for power, and he’ll embrace the most convenient “values” to do that
comment in response to
post
Hhhhaaaaa!
comment in response to
post
This one ^^ was my favorite. Thank you for the laugh!
comment in response to
post
But even if the slaves weren’t beaten or otherwise physically mistreated - they were … owned by other people. That’s kind of enough to make the system utterly evil. All the violence is just bonus evil.
comment in response to
post
But… a bunch of ridiculous tariffs remain. This is not over
comment in response to
post
He did his best not to outright condemn it though.
comment in response to
post
Hey Eric, whose job is to to answer those raised questions? Anyone? Anyone?
comment in response to
post
You’re hitting the perfect level of explanation and background. Yes, sadly we need to explain what seems self-evident. I appreciate you doing that work.
comment in response to
post
MAGA is the least patriotic faction out there. How are you going to shit on a major part of your own country? Don’t get it
comment in response to
post
This is such a heartbreaking sign
comment in response to
post
Did JD visit him yesterday?
comment in response to
post
He is resegregating every institution
comment in response to
post
My god, there is no bottom
comment in response to
post
It’s not “women” though. It’s one particular woman whose job is to get people’s attention. Daring AF, but, also, she can pull it off.
comment in response to
post
Ha! This can be read in a couple of ways
comment in response to
post
This kind of thing is triggering my revenge instinct. I would want to penalize this guy for making such an outrageous statement
comment in response to
post
This. NYT insists on never earning my subscription back
comment in response to
post
He thinks money and power insultate the white-adjacent. He may be right.
comment in response to
post
Lori Daybell smashed preconceived notions about duties to family members and their so-called right to remain alive. In a few short months, she made remarkable progress in accomplishing the goal of suppressing their bodily functions.
This framing is insane, NYT.
comment in response to
post
gun owning Americans will fold and will be victimized as easily as any other. The only thing that will happen is that their fantasy of self-defense will be revealed as a pipe dream
comment in response to
post
They say this shit while supporting the most made up orange man in the universe? The gall!
comment in response to
post
It’s so original and so goddam fun and sounds so good and looks so good. Just amazing
comment in response to
post
Hhhhaaaahhha!
comment in response to
post
You don’t know what a rough night I had and how much your post helped me get through it
comment in response to
post
Dorothea Brooke is not just an iconic nineteenth-century heroine, she is also extremely hot. I won’t post this candid pic I got of her laughing at a party to demonstrate, but I could.
comment in response to
post
Why exactly should scholars be dispassionate about the prospect of shrinking constitutional rights? I don’t get it
comment in response to
post
Ouch! How alarmed are you by this rate?
comment in response to
post
That’s awesome, thank you!
comment in response to
post
Not to take advantage of your expertise, but, if it takes you less than a moment to explain, how did you do that? (which tools you used etc). Thank you!
comment in response to
post
That’s just “health,” “hygiene,” etc. “wellness” is framework and it includes antivax attitudes, “functional” “medicine,” “holistic” “treatments,” cupping, and other total nonsense
comment in response to
post
*was secularizing. Who knows where we end up with all this authoritarian shit going on.
comment in response to
post
Love to not have any moral high ground to stand on
comment in response to
post
Another little pig man!
comment in response to
post
He is the one person whose own word means nothing. He’s obsessed with IQ and being seen as a boy genius and he is very likely to have adopted the label for that purpose alone. He is a certified liar.
comment in response to
post
The way Cramer is trying to walk the tightrope between saying on what’s his mind and still rimming the administration is extremely embarrassing
comment in response to
post
True. We’re so fucked
comment in response to
post
Was that ever captured on audio? His supporters refuse to believe the written press