femboyval.bsky.social
A Femboy who's into weed, metal, cozy vibes and most importantly cuddles :3 🔞
Arab, Atheist, Bisexual, Cat lover
Bilingual: Arabic and Preferably English
I have no tolerance towards bigotry and hatred
Sona is my OC named Alice, drawn by Almy (SuchAlmy)
163 posts
138 followers
13 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Well, Americans either mass revolt now or never.
Knowing Americans, most of them couldn't be bothered, judging by the lack of massive defiant activity in comparison to the threat size.
comment in response to
post
Good
comment in response to
post
What a horrible day to have eyes.
comment in response to
post
AI, fuck off
comment in response to
post
Looked through the entire thread just for someone to say what you've said.
The lack of your words on a broader level perfectly explains what's going on and why there's this kind of 'in-fighting'
Which leads me to think that people forget why people leave their beliefs.
comment in response to
post
Honestly i don't even know why people bother.. the mistakes, the garbage it produces is just so bad.
Moreover, it's a drain of energy, it should stay strictly as a research assisting tool for labs or robotics and similar appliances other than an internet slop generator
comment in response to
post
Yeah, fuck him, because he knows exactly what's wrong with the US and has been correct for quite a while so far, at the same time actually doing something to fix it.
More over "Proud zionist", that part is self explainatory.
comment in response to
post
They're involved somewhat militarily, though not to a large extent, more so using proxies to do their bidding.
After all, there are quite alot of groups wanting control in Syria, thats an even bigger problem now.
So whatever they want in Syria it is also malicious.
comment in response to
post
I can tell you, being someone who lived in the middle east, has syrian friends and lived with syrians as neighbours.
Turkey is very deeply involved, especially closer to their border, Israel though is unknown to me.. but one thing i know their intentions will be malicious.
comment in response to
post
The amount of em who think I'm a maga because i firmly think these kinds of politicians are also bad.
That never said i support trump, never will.
comment in response to
post
Why is she holding the rifle like that..
comment in response to
post
Some of them escaped Russia, and even more don't support him either.
Doing this sends people back to hell
comment in response to
post
I think a twig has a higher skill rating than him.
comment in response to
post
Then you pirate their products.
They want to push anti consumer practices, you stop giving them money.
comment in response to
post
I've said it once that religious extremists can't seem to view anything opposite of their view outside of a "rival religion" mentality.
Simply put, anything 'other' is another religion when it isnt.
comment in response to
post
The dick riding is insane with this one.
comment in response to
post
I have never blocked an account faster than i have blocked her and anyone that follows her.
comment in response to
post
There's a growing rebellion in Iran that's been asking for the regime to fall.
In fact this has been a thing for a while, back when Israel retaliated against Iran, lots of Iranians on social media were oddly 'happy' about it in hopes that it would be what kills the regime
Harsh reality.
comment in response to
post
Sorry to hear that :/
You deserve to live without pain and in happiness.
comment in response to
post
Glad you found something that helps.
For me it was actually weed that stopped the flashbacks, a shame it's demonized in this country despite this..
comment in response to
post
I've "really wanted to" get better for 9 years while suffering from PTSD and during that I've gone through 20 different meds for it, basically none but one worked and not anymore.
I don't consider myself to be as disabled as someone physically disabled but i hate that rhetoric, it's tiring.
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't trust the telegraph entirely and it seems very odd for me they'd publish this.
However this seems exactly like something Russia would be behind.
comment in response to
post
Talk about racing to conclusions..
comment in response to
post
This scares me for one reason, it could happen in the UK, it could happy in any developed country with a tyrant on the helm.
There needs to be a fucking silver bullet or some absolute solution to shit like this.
Another question is, will these people see their freedom ever again, even after trump?
comment in response to
post
Point is, you have access to a secure tool IF you need it.
You don't know.. down the line anything you deem normal, or any regular person would deem normal the government will be after you for it.
It's a nice-to-have thing to keep around, just something to keep in mind.
comment in response to
post
I remember seeing a headline in the UK that "the rich are leaving, and it's bad for the economy"
It may be, because they'd take their money elsewhere, ON THE OTHER HAND i don't have to deal with these uptight parasites as much, they barely give back, if any.
Win/win in my book.
comment in response to
post
That i absolutely agree with, but yeah i am not discussing the layers of failure their OPSEC had, which in this case, they had no OPSEC to begin with, there's no security supervisor checking the channel for third parties or active exploits or intrusion.
comment in response to
post
In this case, if you bring in a third party encryption is null and void.
Say we're in 1 room and sound proof walls, there's an enemy outside waiting to listen in, then i outright bring him in to listen in, the sound proofing (encryption) is then null and void.
That's a user error.
comment in response to
post
To add to this, haven't you heard of the numerous amounts of times corporations and governments got hacked because of some lousy employee leaving out his password, or clicked on a phishing email or fell for such exploits, within secure channels?
if not, keep up with cyber security news.
comment in response to
post
And that's the user error.
Signal's technology by basis is a secure enviroment, not secure from errors, as any form of communication can be.
Sorry but your argument just doesn't add anything here, im not against the fact they shouldn't have used this, all im saying Signal (as a tool) is secure
comment in response to
post
Because the user error had no supervision, to paint it clearer the tool (signal) had no technological error in this regard, rather a user, trusted user, within that group chat, brought in a third party and leaked to it.
This is clear and simple a user error, encryption is pointless here.
comment in response to
post
Sure.. sure..
comment in response to
post
It was literally fucking leaked..
This whole incident boils down to user error, not tool error.
comment in response to
post
All i said was "Signal was secure", there is nothing wrong about my argument, i am simply stating something from a technological prespective, and i made it clear several times what i was strictly talking about, the technological aspect, people some people don't know about it specifically.
comment in response to
post
It's alright, i just have to deal with like 5 notifications a minute, the fire's in my house :3
Jokes aside, my point here is to inform about the technology, not the.. stupid action that Pete Hegseth did, which i honestly have no words to describe how absolutely stupid that was.
comment in response to
post
So russian hackers found an exploit that allowed them access to encrypted information.
Take that ideology and scope out to any form of communication, you'll find potential exploits in ever form of communication, physical or technical.
This argument is pointless, everything can be hacked.
comment in response to
post
1- im discussing Signal's technology and it's security, not the adminstation (for the 7th time probably, just read the damn comments)
2- i didn't even mention that, nor gave it mind, because that's not what im talking about.
Now can yall actually read the whole discussion or you wanna talk first?
comment in response to
post
I agree with that.
My whole point is that signal i secure, not if this adminstation should've done this or not, that really is not what im arguing about here and i've had to say this to several other commenters already.
comment in response to
post
May be illegal, but it's vital.
Think... down the line when anything you do the government may deem as a violation and i'm talking ordinary thought "critic" of the government as they deem then you need that privacy to communicate
And that's where signal is just a tool, can be used for good or evil
comment in response to
post
Oh, that's what you're arguing?
I'm really only talking about the technology here, not the administration's stupidity.
In this case, i agree that their motives are outright sinister, but really that's not what my discussion is about.
comment in response to
post
I'd rather total privacy than total surveillance.
Signal is a tool that can be used for right or wrong.
comment in response to
post
Doesn't matter, no records, no indirect leaks, it boils down to user error
comment in response to
post
That i agree with.
comment in response to
post
That's the only solid argument, seriously.
But I'm strictly discussing the technology unlike the stupid fossils using it that didn't know a bit of online security.
comment in response to
post
Signal, again, doesn't store any user messages even encrypted, that's the whole point of it's security and why it's actually secure.
Should a country's administration use it to share classified information? Absolutely not because user error leads to leaks outside of protected channels.
comment in response to
post
Signal foundation is a non profit American organization -.-
It saves no user messages, has no access to them, not even the encrypted data on their own servers.
comment in response to
post
The 'intelligence community' quite literally praised signal for it's security.
This is especially when the FBI wanted to subpoena a user and all they were given was the users' username and account date.
Not a single message, so what are you on about.
comment in response to
post
It is, signal saves no information except very bare bones stuff, messages are encrypted and are only saved on recipient devices, the FBI attempted a subpoena once, got fuck all.
I can discuss technicality more, if you know cyber security, that is.
comment in response to
post
Signal is secure.