ferrarajc.bsky.social
151 posts
35 followers
58 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Very alarming yes, but we should wait to hear more facts on this. Judges are bound by federal law too. If this turns out to be a baseless and capricious arrest, that’s when we’ll know they’ve gone too far.
comment in response to
post
Guy mugging me: Gimmie all your money and I won’t shoot you.
Trump: Pretty big concession.
comment in response to
post
More precisely that’ll be step 2
comment in response to
post
Were you referencing Let The Right One In in the zinger
comment in response to
post
Incredible weakness. What a pathetic little man Trump is.
comment in response to
post
Who carries around $3,000 in cash
comment in response to
post
I really, really hope that he’s still alive.
comment in response to
post
How do these people feel no moral imperative to bring a man back who was mistakenly sent to a foreign torture prison? How do they not feel an urgency to get him out of that situation? What’s missing inside them?
comment in response to
post
Here’s an American administration saying that a person we erroneously sent to a Salvadoran torture prison cannot be brought back. This is not us. We are not a country that shrugs off justice. We are a country that champions justice.
comment in response to
post
In his first term Trump took personal interest in ditching plans to put Harriet Tubman on the 20 dollar bill. Now his administration took her image off of a web page about the Underground Railroad. I really believe that Trump has a personal issue with looking at Harriet Tubman.
comment in response to
post
Does Congress have the ability to repeal the tariffs that Trump has put in place or are they powerless to intervene?
comment in response to
post
Rulli is selling you a line of shit. Nothing he’s saying will happen is going to happen. There is no golden age down this path, just an ever deepening spiral into misery.
comment in response to
post
They can do that? Let’s go. I’m calling my senators and rep.
comment in response to
post
Trump needs to resign.
comment in response to
post
😐🐆🫥
comment in response to
post
This is so stupid. Trade deficits are in no way bad things. This policy assumes that any country that we buy stuff from should be expected to buy as much of our stuff. Why? We’re importing something of value and selling our wares to the highest bidder in a global market. That’s capitalism.
comment in response to
post
This man’s brain is cream of wheat
comment in response to
post
Ok so the modern Republican Party is AGAINST free trade and FOR farm subsidies. I’m not getting how this is supposed to be the conservative party.
comment in response to
post
This is exactly what Democrats need to be doing. Say out loud that Trump’s policies are illegal, immoral, and injurious. This is not a normal administration and traditional politics aren’t enough. Make a huge freaking show of it. Make him own the consequences of his actions. Fight back.
comment in response to
post
100% fine with this. These are human beings entitled to dignity.
comment in response to
post
Claiming that the pain of tariffs will get better if you just wait long enough is deeply irresponsible. Prices are going to go up and stay up. Other countries will retaliate, draining export revenue. They’ll make trade deals that exclude the US. This is bad on top of bad as far as the eye can see.
comment in response to
post
It’s perverse to call it “helping farmers” when you’re trying to mitigate the harms you’re inflicting on them
comment in response to
post
Doesn’t Noem’s susceptibility to collapsing into narrow self-interest (when people such as you pointedly did not) suggest that her apparent kindness compassion and faith were a facade constructed to obscure her true character?
comment in response to
post
Barring an unforeseen major news event the next few months are going to be dominated by Trump’s tariffs. His voters are about to find out what they’ve signed up for.
comment in response to
post
Eliminating funding for science will make America less competitive long into the future as the best minds leave the US for countries that will be happy to back their work.
comment in response to
post
Yeah I mean he’s a bonehead for adding a reporter to the chat but honestly every one of them severely fucked up here. Not a one of them said hey, we shouldn’t be communicating on Signal at all, much less about imminent military strikes, much less without even checking who’s on this group chat.
comment in response to
post
It’s both hilarious and terrifying that it’s working
comment in response to
post
Mike Waltz had Jeffrey Goldberg’s number on Signal for the same reason as everyone else in Washington: because he’s an anonymous source. He’s making these bullshit excuses because he hopes Trump’s too dumb to figure that out.