Profile avatar
fredrivett.com
trying to work out what this place is ——— ⌨️ crafting lex.page 🏡 developing @seahaven.holiday 🔜 tinkering @currentlyread.ing ✍🏻 writing fredrivett.com
352 posts 162 followers 150 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
lots more to come on this soon!
comment in response to post
src: www.pewresearch.org/journalism/f...
comment in response to post
🫡
comment in response to post
i was thinking about building something like this that analysed the content of blocked/banned accounts for political views, aggression etc could also take a username and get their most recent 200 posts in their feed and do similar analysis not much time, but tempted
comment in response to post
ahh thanks hun
comment in response to post
i wouldn’t be that harsh on him
comment in response to post
incorrect but cute
comment in response to post
took me a while to learn this, but it was so liberating when i did i've since given myself license to make every mistake once ideally i won't, but if i do, so be it, but if i make the same mistake twice, that's a more serious issue, three times and i'm a fool
comment in response to post
clothing is definitely the issue here derek good point
comment in response to post
echo chamber incoming
comment in response to post
when bluesky board members are reposting stuff like this you know you’re in trouble
comment in response to post
classic 😂
comment in response to post
seems like everyone’s agreeing with you chad
comment in response to post
ah wasn’t taking it as a call to stop, just empathising, it’s draining
comment in response to post
oops sorry haha understandable though drafted a 2.5k word blog post on it and then will move on with my life
comment in response to post
www.axios.com/2024/10/31/d...
comment in response to post
reform campaign spending
comment in response to post
10s penalty, seems fair
comment in response to post
faes off the bench, on the bench since rvn took the helm, down to 10!
comment in response to post
no surprise to see verstappen being aggressive, would like to see that again to see who was at fault but i’m glad drivers are happy to take the contact, can’t let him bully the field
comment in response to post
it is distrubingly good
comment in response to post
yeah we'll probably need solutions, i don't think about it too much as i've seen enough black mirror for one lifetime 🙈
comment in response to post
comparison is only the death of happiness if you pair it with jealousy
comment in response to post
I have conflicting feelings about more devices (especially those with cameras) but can't deny the idea is enticing
comment in response to post
won’t be long until that’s supported with ar glasses tho
comment in response to post
that can be true and a horrible truth whilst also not endorse, celebrate or invite murdering by group that’s my only point that we should be quite careful normalising that hopefully not a controversial take
comment in response to post
she’s clearly been caught off guard in a storm here and that’s no fun for anyone, but that doesn’t make me inclined to believe that words mean something they don’t, from a professional wordsmith
comment in response to post
“we” clearly means “i and others in my group” as a popular journalist she has two key characteristics here that are important: 1. she knows how words work 2. she knows the influence she has over others if she misspoke on it then retract and apologise, but trying to redefine words doesn’t add up
comment in response to post
i hadn’t seen this, so thank you for sharing joshua i can empathise if she posted in emotion and haste, and regrets what she said. unfortunately she doesn’t seem to regret it, and stands by the statement. to say that the “we” in “we want executives dead” means “lots of people” simply isn’t true
comment in response to post
i’ll try my best mike but may only end up fumbling my way in the dark, hopefully without unnecessary damage en route cautiously optimistic
comment in response to post
lovely username
comment in response to post
you may be right mike, certainly my perspective is limited, and i appreciate your nuance and good faith engagement obviously there’s no burden on anyone to educate me but hopefully i can learn over time on this, as i’d be delighted if my confidence in this platform grew (it’s already *not bad*)
comment in response to post
the commitment to free speech is at the protocol level which is great(!) but seems less so at the appview level, at least the community guidelines don’t mention it at all, but maybe it’s somewhere else i’ve missed
comment in response to post
my main concern is the community guidelines are all about creating a welcoming respectful community but that’s only if you fit who they want here, otherwise the answer is ~“use the protocol but not this appview” which is understandable, but seems to create unnecessary echo chambers in my opinion
comment in response to post
in terms of taste we all prefer the stuff we don’t like to be fully banned, but my pref is towards less moderation/censorship for non-illegal stuff and use labels, lists and default user prefs (w/ prompt to confirm during onboarding) bsky’s setup here seems really close to this tech wise
comment in response to post
it’s a great question and my thoughts are lightly held my main hope is that platforms apply the rules consistently, so if you decide to allow posts celebrating the murder of a specific person and their group you should allow that for other groups too obviously both are distasteful and concerning
comment in response to post
will take a look, thanks joshua and thanks for engaging in a civil, constructive way about a hot potato, not an easy one
comment in response to post
yes definitely! we should never expect perfection, just best intentions and direction the intentions are good, i just have concerns about the application and direction hopefully my concerns will prove unfounded, but struggled to quell them so far despite lots of trying
comment in response to post
yeah i’m open to being educated on that front too! i know jack was pro free speech but struggled to build that as policy, and obviously a lot has changed since then also not saying twitter is better, just feel like this place could be great if lists/labels were used over bans more often
comment in response to post
that’s very fair, i hope that my understanding and perspective is limited and that the picture is much better than what i’ve seen have struggled to get clarity in my questions so far, but know the team are mad busy any recommended reading?
comment in response to post
thanks mubs, hopefully you’re right as 90% of the foundations here are great! would love for this place to succeed as long as it doesn’t unnecessarily contribute to the problem
comment in response to post
thanks craig, and appreciate yours too hopefully we can build the best place for folks from different perspectives to respectfully engage, realise that’s a very hard problem though i don’t have all the answers, just some questions that i’ve yet to find answers that feel great to me
comment in response to post
i hope you’re right, but in all my questions trying to understand if this appview will lean towards free speech or censorship it’s primarily censorship but only if you don’t hold the correct opinion was hopeful that lists/labels would solve this rather than bans at appview level for opinions
comment in response to post
i understand this is a hard problem, i just have concerns is all, and think we should be mindful of the platform so we make our own informed choice i won’t bleat on this forever dw
comment in response to post
yeah that’s fair, i bet there’s been a lot of folks looking to troll and can understand that’s tiresome just surprised that wasn’t stated and free speech even mentioned in the community guidelines it’s a principle of the network, not this appview if it is no-one has told me yet
comment in response to post
i agree of course, but the line the team have chosen to set is based upon making sure content here is “welcoming” and “respectful” and if you share an opinion a protected group don’t like you will be banned the line should be far closer to illegal content than thinking the wrong thing