gabssnake.bsky.social
Web platform, static analysis
34 posts
168 followers
902 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
At least in France traditional banks are slow and expensive. They require postal delivery for any secure transaction. UI/UX in their apps is decades behind. Management fee, card fee, etc. Digital banks don’t charge those, and do things quickly and conveniently.
comment in response to
post
Do have intel into why it is not used anymore? Having to change the title via document seems annoying. Also it feels like the big mistake was putting title before url.
comment in response to
post
I really like this idea of willing to do the work to get the value, it shines a light!
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but that’s not cheese (forced French accent)
comment in response to
post
Can’t ignore the “fren” connotation used by 4chan far-right creeps
comment in response to
post
This is my preferred way of coding on difficult topics! It’s absolutely magical to use functions that are perfectly convenient, except they don’t exist yet. Learned this method from SICP.
comment in response to
post
did you have to do debugging on the generated code? that sounds painful
comment in response to
post
that’s fair
comment in response to
post
What’s wrong with tree-sitter? I wanna know all about that
comment in response to
post
Try using Elm, before you cave in
comment in response to
post
Not arguing what you’re saying. Just saying people have poor reading comprehension.
comment in response to
post
I was reacting to “it’s a Boolean situation […] you either can do it or not”. Don’t know what’s your angle.
comment in response to
post
Perhaps you just skipped or read too fast the text in the image, that’s OK
comment in response to
post
The task for 10-1 is to multiply random 10-digit numbers with random 1-digit numbers, and doing all possible combinations, then doing it 40 times without mistakes
comment in response to
post
That’s not how science and engineering work
comment in response to
post
Gitlab pages?
comment in response to
post
Intrigued. What is Jermaine? Can we see the code?
comment in response to
post
If it is a joke, it is a great joke. Very elegantly done.
It is a joke right? Right?!
comment in response to
post
Third profile is the answer
comment in response to
post
the types seems to be oddly formatted compared to the code, also uneven within the same page, like in writeFile
comment in response to
post
1/ breaking means forcing users to change their code
2/ no. however, you can be fine with annoying users on your own terms and communicate it upfront
3/ no. however, you might care less or more based on that!
comment in response to
post
I was hoping for a simplistic silver bullet like sanitize input, or Object.create, or something magical 😅
comment in response to
post
How to avoid it?
comment in response to
post
I got you from a starter pack, you’re on trial
comment in response to
post
Tell us more
comment in response to
post
French makes it better
comment in response to
post
Did you use any tools to help? What’s your process?
comment in response to
post
I believe the best competitor to TypeScript would be a subset of JavaScript that happens to be amenable to static analysis and IDE enhancements.
comment in response to
post
It looks great! How does this automation work? How do you generate the text content? It is very succinct and nicely formatted and relevant!
Are you aggregating existing bits from several sources with simple scripting? Any LLM trickery involved? 🙈
comment in response to
post
Slightly bad code in, slightly better code out
comment in response to
post
How? Where? I must see it
comment in response to
post
arstechnica.com/science/2012...
comment in response to
post
Post a non-religious photo you think of as holy.
comment in response to
post
Well there’s a bunch of people called Pierre, so