garethrichards1.bsky.social
Project manager, Interest in social Justice, criminal Justice, rugby, sport and useless facts.EFC for my sins.
1,088 posts
670 followers
1,098 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Expect them to also take any nuclear developments further underground (metaphorically and physically) and with no UN observers.
comment in response to
post
Has to be a wider assessment tool that mixes knowledge, application of knowledge, engagement, job related skills, and practical skills. Exams, verbal, presentation, In class discussion/ assessment. Understanding of knowledge.
comment in response to
post
Full Sykes and Matza playbook . www.jstor.org/stable/2089195
comment in response to
post
UK media will do a full scale Israeli victimised propaganda, so no other countries matter.
comment in response to
post
Another PM bowing to the US , another Iraq. How can we sanction some of.isreal gov, then sell arms and send troops.
Starmer the Human rights lawyer?? A british PM indulgening in Appeasement again.
comment in response to
post
100%
comment in response to
post
I do not recall the public being asked whether they want to go to war to protect a government that is committing genocide against its subject population
comment in response to
post
I get that. I can't imagine the weight of pressure some of our players feel, when as a fan base we can be awful to our players, and you can see the crowd turn and for the past few years trying to stay up. (yes it's a privilege to play pro football, and for everton)
comment in response to
post
Was chaotic when he had to play all the time, and we were sat in super low block. In a team that is a little more aggressive and not having to play for 90 mins, and maybe not fighting relagation. Then he's a decent pro for the squad. Doesn't mean we a build team around him. And can score.
comment in response to
post
I'm ok with that as squad player, I can imagine he's proper professional on training ground, moyes will do him good. And means money for other positions
comment in response to
post
I'm all for no nuclear weapons anywhere.
comment in response to
post
So we are complicit.
comment in response to
post
Is he now MACO?
comment in response to
post
And the prem don't want outside regulations?
comment in response to
post
We have to agree to disagree. The points of Religious extremist/nationalist must apply to all or none.
comment in response to
post
You've just undone all your points.
There has never been peace there.
comment in response to
post
I should say the rules haven't changed they were always designed to keep power and wealth. But the likes of Obama, Blair, Clinton, bush,Thatcher at least tried to be polite with thier rule breaking and look for "wars".
comment in response to
post
the rules have changed over the years, as Western countries applied different rules to themselves than to the developing countries, to maintain their hegemony. As the rules are bent and manipulated,they break. And any effort to look like adherence to rules isn't needed. Return to A state of nature
comment in response to
post
MAGA is also using ethno Christianity to bolster its cause. Or visa versa. So it become a extreme nationalist religious movement, not dissimilar to those regimes that the West/US keeps saying are threats (Isreal being the exception).
comment in response to
post
Not sure a religious mindset is taking over, but religion is being manipulated (as always) to enact power. Regardless of if or what you believe, religion bring people together for good and bad. And is used by powerful actors for thier own means under thier ideas of what a "God" wants.
comment in response to
post
People won’t trust courts or parties. They won’t believe evidence. They’ll be certain their side is right, no matter what reality says.
That’s not disagreement. That’s epistemic fracture. And once it sets in, it’s nearly impossible to reverse.
comment in response to
post
@brendanmay.bsky.social is ok for genocide as long as its environmentally friendly
comment in response to
post
From a climate point of view bombing the fuck out of things, creating mass placement, rebuilding a state, all the manufacturing of warfare; well it's not exciting climate friendly. Or have isreal got recycled bombs, paper bullets and solar powered helicopters and tanks.
comment in response to
post
Not a stunt. They knew they wouldn't be allowed, it's about raising awareness. Don't think it damages anything other that showing exactly what was intended. I think it enhances the campaigners standing x 100. As is Greta has stated you can't separated human right from climate crisis.
comment in response to
post
"National emergency" opens up many avenues for Trump. He's looked at isreal and Russia and seen what war allows internally. Is also passed that his tariffs could be enforced because of no "emergency" so he's created 1. the mid terms, democracy will be destroyed by a manufactured emergency
comment in response to
post
Sure they will take it out on the protesters. When dust settles they will just say they were following orders. Heard that before!!!!
comment in response to
post
Capitalist carcerality in full swing. Create the conditions to criminalise more, invoke more social control, surveillanceand oppression, move public money to private companies on behalf of "law and order" and "war on".
comment in response to
post
How does this bloke function daily.
comment in response to
post
I'm guessing alot of inside info is going to be dropped.
comment in response to
post
Is winning in isreal anti-Semitic?
comment in response to
post
Musk has access to alot if Gov systems and information the past 2 months. Bet there's a few Aces in those cards.
comment in response to
post
Has Elon been to rehab?