garethsjones.bsky.social
Welsh climate scientist mostly found buried in the pages of a good book, or wandering the footpaths of East Devon. Also on https://toot.wales/@garethsjones
124 posts
336 followers
199 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to
post
Non public data... a future publication. Am I the only one who sees an issue here?
comment in response to
post
and "For all baselines we take ERA5 reanalysis as ground truth. This choice is made as this is standard practice for evaluation machine learning NWP models."
comment in response to
post
What extra information needed to do the attn update? Changes in models used? Where did the forcing estimate updates come from... are they documented? What do the uncertainties represent in % and are they the same as the other values in the graph? Was obs used same as shown in graph? ...
comment in response to
post
The devil is in the details.
comment in response to
post
A bit disappointed that they haven't referenced many Detection and Attribution studies, who have been applying the "best practices" for a while.
comment in response to
post
Think I might need to replace my 'Mathematical Desk Companion' ;-)
comment in response to
post
Here's Nature's own policy on the matter.
comment in response to
post
One more point in my increasingly irate and humourless response to this absolute bollocks. The made a hairy fucking mouse.
Why? This is not to study a disease, or to uncover a molecular mechanism that might elucidate some basic biology. They made a mouse hairy as a little sideshow for their circus.