glennlray.bsky.social
Negative Space Identifier
Cosmic Ray Dodger
Stamplicker to the Stars
58 posts
34 followers
9 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Hey... if Musk and Trump shenanigans included sound effects, I'd buy a ticket
comment in response to
post
ESPN Deportes for the win. Great call.
comment in response to
post
I'm trying to understand Lutnick's point. He's claiming that, in this zero tariff scenario that Kennedy hypothesizes, China would essentially use Vietnam as a middleman to avoid tariffs on $90 billion in goods flowing through their country. Is this factually the case now?
comment in response to
post
To get $$$ and keep the spin.
comment in response to
post
I've never understood why witnesses before house and senate committees - who persist in talking over representatives - cannot be treated as hostile witnesses like in a court of law.
comment in response to
post
Zero on the truck. A bunch on the trailer.
comment in response to
post
GRANDE.
(Applogies to Wierd Al)
youtu.be/mX18yNwqnMg?...
comment in response to
post
I'm not suggesting the tattoos symbolically sta d for MS-13, but
1) Has anyone explained what they do represent?
2) Why would Rep. Swalwell use "doctored" rather than "superimposed" or "added to the image" instead? Wouldn't that have been a better tactic to draw out a bogus reply?
comment in response to
post
Congresspeople need to modify their tactics when questioning these nominees. They should start with simple, yes or no questions on constitutional grounds. Then, they need to sit back and let the respondents spew out idiotic, undefensible points so that it's on the record and can be used against them
comment in response to
post
Their marketing department is doing horrible work. The lowest tier used to be "Wanna Get Away"; now it's just "Basic."
comment in response to
post
Confusing with Spirit.
comment in response to
post
None of the replies here provide any evidence that anyone in the President's family - besides himself - applied for and were rejected by Harvard. It's a compelling story, but that's the kind of attack that the President uses against his opponents. Let's get this right.
comment in response to
post
Kennedy looks like he's passing gas. I think this group is more like "After Abe smacks him a bit, I'm next."
comment in response to
post
^^^^THIS!!!^^^^
It's clearly an unconstitutional clause, but it will take several court cases to get it overturned. And that means it could be years before unlawful behavior of the executive branch is rectified.
comment in response to
post
Those are adorable! But, I must admit that I saw three, yellow, three-eyed ghosts in the bottom print before I did a double-take.
comment in response to
post
It's definitely M104.
science.nasa.gov/missions/web...
comment in response to
post
My take on this.
bsky.app/profile/glen...
comment in response to
post
Standard & Poors may soon follow suit. Remember when they did that in 2011? What a s$%# show that was afterwards.
comment in response to
post
It's always exhausting to have to point out the hypocrisy but someone's gotta do it. 7/7
comment in response to
post
And there's this tweet from Jack Posobiec in 2022 with even less context than Comey: 6/7
x.com/JackPosobiec...
comment in response to
post
Tshirtpalace:
"86 46 Impeach Biden 46 Vintage Distressed 8646 Anti Biden T-Shirt"
5/7
www.teeshirtpalace.com/products/86-...
comment in response to
post
On Redbubble:
"cute Retro 8646 joe Biden anti, not my President , Impeach 86 46 Biden Harris vintage Mountain Essential T-Shirt" (just one of several designs) 4/7
www.redbubble.com/i/t-shirt/cu...
comment in response to
post
On Amazon:
"8646 Impeach Biden Vintage T-Shirt Oversized Cotton Short Sleeve Tees" 3/7
www.amazon.com/Impeach-Vint...
comment in response to
post
For years, t-shirts and other paraphernalia have been sold with an amazingly similar catchphrase. Note how all of these are labeled.
2/7
comment in response to
post
Bit by bit, this administration is trying to chip away at Constitutional governance and protections.
8/8
comment in response to
post
What "Rebellion?" What "Invasion?"
Last time I think that might have been applicable was January 6, 2021.
7/8
comment in response to
post
Again, the Constitution says in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1:
"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
6/8
comment in response to
post
But, as concerning as the possible Qatari gift is, it's a distraction from what Stephen Miller suggested last weekend: a suspension of Habeas Corpus.
5/8
comment in response to
post
Seems pretty clear to me, even as a non-lawyer, that no elected official can receive any gift without approval of Congress. Period. No circumstantial justification is noted.
4/8
comment in response to
post
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."
3/8
comment in response to
post
So, here is the "Emoluments clause", Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8:
2/8
comment in response to
post
Which pension fund was it?
comment in response to
post
I just finished "Hail Mary" yesterday. Good science, but took a while to engage me.
comment in response to
post
I knew he was making shit up when he paused before he said we lost one trillion dollars from China last year. Census dot gov shows that the trade deficit with China last year was $295 billion ($279B in 2023, $382B in 2022) www.census.gov/foreign-trad...
comment in response to
post
Hey, don't leave out Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas (Beryl last year).
comment in response to
post
Hegseth-nated Driver