gohanprolife.bsky.social
I'm a pro life catholic searching to prove myself wrong. I call into atheist shows sometimes
2,608 posts
64 followers
124 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
What did Bruce say
comment in response to
post
When did I say that?
comment in response to
post
Talking about maybe how evolution supports the idea of a creator/guide
comment in response to
post
Of course there was. But I don't remember ever saying it was there fault. I said it was the card they were dealt, not it was their fault
It's just as much their fault they are both with abnormalities as Michael Phelps born with abnormalities
comment in response to
post
If Christianity is right the concept of sin did NOT come from the Bible, it came from God
comment in response to
post
If you regard Dawkins opinions highly you might want to check out the debates between him and my boi John Lennox
They actually discuss this quote and your objection. If your looking to plant a seed that might do it
comment in response to
post
Rephrase please your post went over my head
comment in response to
post
Yes it was evolution. Even Jesus replied that it wasn't that the man or his parents sinned
Evolution is built off random mutation of genes. That blind man got the short end of the stick for random mutation
comment in response to
post
Bro he talks about Christus being responsible for the superstition
comment in response to
post
Name one historian doubting tacitus
comment in response to
post
Yes that's how evolution occurs
comment in response to
post
The historians take his word on Jesus. So what evidence do you have that we shouldn't trust Tacitus about Jesus
Btw the historians include atheist new testament historians.
comment in response to
post
80 years ago was WW2
Was it okay to spend more money fighting Hitler and Japan than paying for transgender surgeries and abortions or no?
comment in response to
post
Correct. The answer is no. See how I directly answered your question.
Now directly answer mine. Does Tacitus fulfill the requirements of evidence from the other post, of which you said there was none
comment in response to
post
Are you okay if I plant a seed of curiosity for you for religion
comment in response to
post
Eye witness was not apart of your criteria earlier.
Why change your mind now? Because you know you were wing earlier?
bsky.app/profile/rfmo...
comment in response to
post
Yes Tacitus writings on Jesus supports the conclusion he existed
comment in response to
post
Data that supports a conclusion
comment in response to
post
Yes why is it not for evidence
comment in response to
post
Okay point out why Tacitus is not good evidence for the existence of Jesus as a person, other than just saying it's not good evidence
comment in response to
post
Catholics don't even follow that rule buddy. You might have an argument if you were taking to a protestant but your not. It's not solo scriptura
But even a protestant will agree it's not based on the book, it's based on God
comment in response to
post
No way to separate it? In my belief, even if the Bible was never written the concept of sin would still be around
Even if it was just God, the concept of sin would be there
comment in response to
post
Hey sorry buddy no offense I forgot to respond to you. My bad. I truly am sorry. Not trying to be rude
comment in response to
post
Oh is Tacitus internal to the bible? How about Mar bar serapian? Josephus? All of the is inside the Bible written by Christians? Or is all of that external evidence to the existence of Jesus
comment in response to
post
There are tons of external evidence that he existed, and a lot from advisaral sources who claim he was not divine
comment in response to
post
But my buddy... Yet
That he did exist and resurrection is supported by the minimal facts hypothesis
comment in response to
post
What's the end goal buddy? That he never existed?
comment in response to
post
I wasn't under the impression Jesus ever wrote anything
comment in response to
post
No thanks Buddy
comment in response to
post
I was told doubting ejection integrity is a danger to our democracy and makes you a traitor to the United States and worthy of cancellation
comment in response to
post
Nope
comment in response to
post
1776 baby
comment in response to
post
Do you have any specific evidence?
comment in response to
post
Where is your evidence for these claims
comment in response to
post
Same with Christianity buddy
comment in response to
post
No buddy your confused. Corey Booker did the Nazi salute
comment in response to
post
I'm not defending Corey Booker?
comment in response to
post
How?
comment in response to
post
Are all pro lifers pro rapists???
A kid has less chance of being raped by a priest than a public school teacher according to stats. So if you support your public schools you are pro pedos by your definition
comment in response to
post
How about my spelling? Did I spell anything right? I guess 100% was wrong right buddy
comment in response to
post
I asked why are women superior. You said because they can get pregnant. This excludes trans women, which means you didn't count them when I asked why are women superior
TRANSPHOBE!!!!!!!
comment in response to
post
It's okay if you misread I do it to sometimes buddy
comment in response to
post
In what context is it okay to say only women can get pregnant???? Which context you transphobic son of a nugget!!!!
Buddy you have no idea what my stance on abortion is
comment in response to
post
You clearly don't believe trans ppl exist because you said only women get pregnant soo... Yeah... Good luck in your woke circles buddy
comment in response to
post
Buddy buddy buddy. The OP wasn't from me. I said you agreed WITH THE OP, I didn't say me. Try again
comment in response to
post
It's okay buddy just admit you can't point out anything wrong in that message specifically.
comment in response to
post
I don't have to pretend to be woke. You have to pretend. That's why you forgot to include trans women when you were talking about women. Pretty transphobic buddy.
If you think someone is pro rape because they are pro life that's on you. I honestly don't care. Just stop killing kids
comment in response to
post
Buddy you agreed that women are better than men from the OP. I asked why. You said because they can have babies. You said that. This excludes all trans women. I called you transphobic. Now you're crying because you can't walk it back
Why do you think women when talking about abortions???
comment in response to
post
Point out what was wrong. Be specific please
comment in response to
post
Why do you think females when talking about abortion???? Men can get pregnant to you transphobic son of a nugget!!!! You're cancelled now buddy