Profile avatar
gp5.bsky.social
Interrested in many subjects with facts in them. Netzero progress.
3,283 posts 163 followers 233 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
You are making too many logical points.
comment in response to post
In reality nuclear is the best in most of that.
comment in response to post
Never you need all clean energy sources to replace fossil and have a functioning grid.
comment in response to post
It is in decommisioning too far. New builds of a few AP1000 at the same location is the best option to remove that massive fossil input into the grid and for the growth of electrcity. Also in other states they should build nuclear, this frees up energy for other states. And a few HT-SMR
comment in response to post
If they go for AP1000, hopefully 4 instead of 1, they will be less costly. Improved buildspeed, no georgia-power and no bankrupt -delay.
comment in response to post
Should have never shutdown the Indianpoint Reactors. Cuomo really hleped RFK jr there and his Riverkeeper.
comment in response to post
It is better to build 4, not 1 here and 1 there.
comment in response to post
It should have never been shutdown, by Cuomo's actions that he did with riverkeeper(RFK jr.) It has benfitted Riverkeeper and the gasplants that where build to replace its capacity.
comment in response to post
De PvdA is nu wel echt begraven.
comment in response to post
PvdA is nu wel echt begraven.
comment in response to post
PvdA is nu wel echt overleden.
comment in response to post
Let's get every clean energy source to replace fossil. Not only for electrcity also for all the high temperature industrial processes.
comment in response to post
They can't see that you do not need a military for a nuclear industry: They want to hide behind a veil to push it down. Germany/S-Korea/Japan developed all there industry without it. Now they will react often with shifting the subject. Anyway for netzero we also need Nuclear/high temp.
comment in response to post
Being for the climate, yet really worrying about nuclear helping with that, I will never understand that. Ps: nuclear capacity will increase as well, even if we only look at China.
comment in response to post
Beating? You mean cooperating I guess.
comment in response to post
That promise is a myth. And electricity still has net-cost, for network/services. Negative-prices even have a cost out of a budget. Do enjoy the sun!
comment in response to post
I'm not a member of them, but have in contact with some. There is actually a paper of there positions. I took an example from this sit about the south/poverty in general, it doesn't fit with what you said. www.weplanet.org/our-vision
comment in response to post
It does show how unchallenged the perception get taken over by anyone.
comment in response to post
Completely disagree with this image you have of ecomodernism.
comment in response to post
Yeah that a different situation, but also with a severe issue on the grid. At that point inverters would also have problems. Having those there to would help with keeping the grid up.
comment in response to post
That's not on the generator side, that's on the grid systems. For that system to decide to reduce the input energy, there must be a very high frequency shift. That's not a normal demand/supply balance situation.
comment in response to post
That's a slight improvement. The main point of in practise, it isn't binding or controlled that it's turned on. (suspect on less kwh production) And systems are already there for atleast next 20 years.
comment in response to post
From this my conclusion is that it won't happen at scale. Its (a little) more cost. And it's not obligatory, enforced by law. And it's not a coordinated response, so it still can become an oscillating force.
comment in response to post
It's only scientifically grounded, that's why I don't see the relationship with techno-optimism. Which I see as having no urgency goal. Ketan likes to set these *negative frames. @weplanetint.bsky.social Can you set a definition. Of ecomodernism.
comment in response to post
No, you can always adapt. And I'm talking about the way towards no meat at all. Do not see that happening out of social acceptance. You actually see the global consumption increase.
comment in response to post
Trivial in as a technical solution, how about cost over time. Are all small installations also in this. Where is the option of combined practises.
comment in response to post
there in it to keep loads more level. The frequency changes because demand is out of sync with supply. Mostly if there isn't enough. Even wind has a small inertia. Then there is geothermal, nuclear, hydro, biogas/mass, fossil turbines or plants. The conclusions still don't say what cut out 1st
comment in response to post
Yes don't confuse them. I would not see a relation. As it's not a thought of getting to a solution as far as I can see it. And all other environmental movements/ideas also lean on technological advancement.
comment in response to post
Then you have a wrong view of what ecomodernism is. Its solution set is broader then legacy enviromentalism. Which limit there choices and foresee a society completely changing towards this single goal
comment in response to post
Why do we need to switch to USA-politics. Please don't
comment in response to post
Not if they think musk is that example Also Ecomodernism is Pragmatism and that you can't change everyone's mind, but you can get them along if there if it has a positive change for them. Not excluding methods, because you don't like it the full 100% IMHO.
comment in response to post
Eco modernism really isn't simple fixes. It's Pragmatism. It's silly to try to place them in a group you already hate. As if to say ecomodernism is the opposite of those that want to bring the climate solutions forward.
comment in response to post
External financing with higher interest and slow progress on political decisions.
comment in response to post
7000 UK demanded changes to the design. Covid, groundwork problems. Financing is a large one, delays increase cost and that needs to be financed.
comment in response to post
It's also, that the cooling design needs more for this time. No one-trough cooling. Choosing for cooling towers. Ps: it's only limiting output for certain (river) locations.
comment in response to post
LCOE is a compare between the same energy sources, it is not applicable to compare different types. And certainly not to make conclusion of what the price of electricity in a certain grid will be. This depends on many more factors and user profiles.
comment in response to post
You started out to say it's not sustainable so that's not true. Nuclear has a closed system of it's materials not other energy source does that to my knowledge or is obligated to do so And my data is scientific, so please keep it correct We will not be able to have a Netzero world without nuclear
comment in response to post
Ofcourse you will use misinformation. The task i gigantic and i think Cananda still is one of the Climate accord signers where nucelar is one of thos sustainable energy sources within the IPCC. For further info
comment in response to post
Not accidently!
comment in response to post
Canada should invest much more in Nuclear, especially Candu-reactors. It's one of the sustainable energy sources.
comment in response to post
Canada really should start building more Candu reactors, of course they should have started decades ago. Can Saskatchewan increase there interconnection capacity, wit surrounding provinces and USA.
comment in response to post
Both. More so they want to be a problem.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
And those that are anti-nuclear also had the anwser. All the nuclear should stay online, regardless if this had happened or not, that's a different subject.
comment in response to post
High variable assets did have a part in the situation, not sole problem as some (fools) like to have it. The investigation is Still not done 😐. Much Variable is a weak spot in there grid. bsky.app/profile/bari...
comment in response to post
Follow the normal instructions, it's only to protect the thyroid. www.cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca/eng/resource...
comment in response to post
Bad advice, iodine tablets are fine.
comment in response to post
And there is a necessity for nuclear in a Netzero world. Being against nuclear is equal to being for fossil fuels.