greekstallion.bsky.social
MSPH, CIH and Doctorate of Occupational Safety and Health cand; trying to fight disinf one peer-reviewed article at a time! Also, the occasional cat pic
119 posts
13,409 followers
263 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Bro just shut the fuck up. You claim your firm was shut down because of the lab leak in your profile. You’re obviously insane.
comment in response to
post
Not at all. I already provided peer reviewed articles on what the scientific community thinks is the origin
comment in response to
post
Both of them had low confidence is their findings. Why are you taking them at face value? I would suggest reading the 520 report and not summaries.
comment in response to
post
Lmao ok dude. Learn how to spell and type first and then we can argue.
comment in response to
post
No he didn’t lol and you can certainly use it at school. But instead of linking Wikipedia you link the peer review articles at the end. You’d know that if you attended school buddy 😊
comment in response to
post
I provided you multiple links and peer reviewed articles proving it’s not a lab leak. I’m not sure how much closer I can get you to understand and shed the propaganda you’ve been fed
comment in response to
post
I guess I have to ask. Do you have any qualifications? Cause everything you’re saying sounds dumb as shit.
comment in response to
post
I also feel Wikipedia in this circumstance does a pretty wonderful summarizing both sides with good articles:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-1...
comment in response to
post
Just reviewed his stuff, interesting items. However, he suggests there’s no direct animal link that can harbor the virus, which seems as an intentional oversight for someone at that level:
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
comment in response to
post
Do you mean Dr. Ralph Baric? If so, then yes
comment in response to
post
Sorry I had to cut some words to match the letter count. But you can look the exact wording if needed in the 520 report. I will review the fees you mentioned and will comment back
comment in response to
post
“In February/March of 23, DOE and FBI publicly acknowledged their respective assessments that COVID19 was the likely result of a lab incident: FBI with moderate confidence and DOE with low confidence. Other intelligence elements assess COVID19 emergence was likely zoonotic, albeit all with low conf”
comment in response to
post
I don’t consider a twitter feed real data but I’ll absolutely look into and respond. However, directly from the 520 page report:
comment in response to
post
It is becoming scarier than normal. They are now using this unscientific report and its findings as a fundamental belief on how to approach future pandemics. Bird flu is around the corner and I can’t even get my hands on the data since President Trump stopped inter-agency communications.
comment in response to
post
It was absolutely incorrect since the findings don’t match the results, based on my evaluation. The findings and conclusion is miles apart on the 520 page report.
Do you have any other sources that I can review that prove there’s no direct link to a zoonotic transfer but rather a lab release?
comment in response to
post
Here is the 520 page House investigation report for anyone that likes to punish themselves like I do:
oversight.house.gov/release/fina...
comment in response to
post
Summarizing, Covid-19 SARS V2 virus was most probably from wet market release. Evidence is still unclear in proving that confidently. H having said that, there’s literally zero proof on the lab leak theory. Even the partisan report proves it, but most of us won’t read besides the title.
comment in response to
post
Since I prefer layman terms, this is what it means. The Republican led committee found nothing new pertaining to the origins besides wet market releases, and then drafted a 520 page report showcasing that they found nothing new; but still ENDED UP CONCLUDING that the main reason was a lab leak
comment in response to
post
“The committee’s 520-page report, released on 2 December, offers no new direct evidence of a lab leak, but summarizes a circumstantial case, including that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) used NIAID money to conduct “gain-of-function” studies that modified distantly related coronaviruses.”
comment in response to
post
Republican leadership created a committee to investigate the origin of the virus. After reading myself the 520 page partisan report, which I won’t bore you to death with, I feel this article paragraph does a wonderful job in putting succinctly my thoughts:
comment in response to
post
Here is the original study for anyone interested in diving deeper into the data:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
comment in response to
post
Done! Best of luck
comment in response to
post
Horrible. The worst person you know made a good point 😂
comment in response to
post
The council sends their greetings!
comment in response to
post
lol I messaged him to get one. Thank you! Hoping he does commissions. My boo and my cats would be hilarious on one of these 😂
comment in response to
post
Happy holidays! Lmao these are absolutely hilarious and awesome 😂
comment in response to
post
Omg that’s absolutely adorable
comment in response to
post
From the same article:
“Research showed the virus was spreading rapidly and efficiently between cows, likely through raw milk, since infected cows shed large amounts of the virus through their mammary glands. Raccoons and farm cats appeared to get sick by drinking raw milk, too.”
comment in response to
post
From the article:
“For one, the bird flu virus — known as H5N1 — has spread uncontrolled in animals, including cows frequently in contact with people. Additionally, detections in wastewater show the virus is leaving a wide-ranging imprint, and not just in farm animals.”
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Much better, thank you kindly. This wasn’t the actual discussion, but let’s chat.
So your only reason for voting Trump was because Trump said he thinks God will save him pretty much, while Kamala said no. Got it.
So you think Trump espouses the Christian doctorate?
comment in response to
post
Oh, that would have gotten an F in any class, so I figured it was a direct translation issue; apologies.
So, do you mind re-writing what you said with the right punctuation? It’s literally one sentence.
comment in response to
post
I’m sorry, I cannot understand what you mean. I speak English, Greek, Spanish and French. Can you use one of those languages?