guy1ncognito.bsky.social
28 posts
14 followers
18 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
im screeching nothing
barriers will stop some kids access to access some platforms, you stating that it will have no impact is for sure a feelpinion
do alchol laws stop all children from drinking, no of course not, does it stop some. why yes it does
comment in response to
post
there are work arounds to all kinds of things that are against the law, it isnt an argument for laws not existing.
I dont agree that agree that age limts are draconian, im sure you would agree 5 year olds shouldnt have an insta / snapchat.
comment in response to
post
you need to look in the same mirror scott does.
the group think on blue sky is the inverse of twitter
comment in response to
post
yes I pointed out the vpn argument was a poor one and stated again and again scott is entitled to his opinion and im the problem..
comment in response to
post
aparently it will be exempt. Im sorry to hear that happened to your child
comment in response to
post
what is wrong with your reading comprehension
comment in response to
post
correct. the new thing is you cant go home and escape it for a little while.
get bullied at school go home and continue to be bullied
comment in response to
post
scott... I said your vpn argument was a poor one and you have been in your feelings since. hold whatever opinion you care too.
I hold a different one
comment in response to
post
when did I say you did JFC re read what you have said
comment in response to
post
any barrier to kids being on social media will stop some of them accessing it.
therefore it will stop some kids being bullied online
there you go there is your proof
comment in response to
post
holy fuck look in a mirror
you are describing youself
comment in response to
post
rofl i havnt attacked you once, I can start if you want
comment in response to
post
good I am only anon on here because of how horrible the far left and right extremes are. If they cant be anon i dont have a reason to be
comment in response to
post
you are entitled to that opinion, scott has a real problem with people holding another one for some reason
comment in response to
post
yes I do think it is about protecting kids
you would of have to of been under a rock to miss all the young boys that got thier minds melted by andrew tate
comment in response to
post
yes,
comment in response to
post
kids feel the need to be online, if it is banned it will be easier to opt out, yeah bullying will continue but they get a break at home.
I dont think children should be on apps bullying each other to death, I dont think they are ready for it.
some adults too actually
comment in response to
post
you have a real problem with someone having a different opinion to you dont you. you can hold that opinion if you like, I do not agree with you.
comment in response to
post
you can hold that opinion i you want, I disagree withy you.
kids being bullied to death and minds being melted by soicial media warrents action imo
comment in response to
post
I disagree with you and I made a specific point about the VPN argument which is a poor one imo
comment in response to
post
i wonder how many seats labor would win if young labor shaped their policy platform, maybe 20-30?
comment in response to
post
just because people use methods to go circumvent laws does not mean they should not exist.
comment in response to
post
Curtin had less impact on Australia than Roosevelt did.
Trump will have a bigger impact than dutton with whats coming
comment in response to
post
American presidents famously have never had an impact outside their boarders.
comment in response to
post
trump
comment in response to
post
yeah imo, the implications from trump getting elected are going to reverberate, dutton getting elected is insignificant in comparrison
comment in response to
post
dutton looking increasingly likely as PM is the least of our worries imo
comment in response to
post
something is going on with boomers on the left that isnt healthy. Mary Kostakidis is just as cooked for example