hanscombe.bsky.social
43 posts
13 followers
16 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Making it even more important to start building all sorts of different coalitions.
comment in response to
post
The small numbers that you mention have done a good job of convincing me that leftists need to work together with every anti-Trump group if they realistically want to defeat Trump.
comment in response to
post
What percentage of humans in the US do you call liberals?
If Trump has about 50% of voters and IF you are correct that liberals are also on the right, you have an even bigger problem than had occurred to me.
comment in response to
post
Sure, agree, but in other first world democracies a candidate like Trump would struggle to get 10% of the vote.
Something is fundamentally wrong and the incompetence of some fighting Trump is surely incidental (and very disappointing) rather than the underlying problem.
comment in response to
post
But the interesting question is not about what names are used in the name calling.
As posed by the original post in this thread, the interesting question is about how the left spends more time fighting itself than fighting Trump.
comment in response to
post
Talán először nézd meg, mit mondott a másik. A válaszodból úgy tűnik, mintha egyetértenél vele.
comment in response to
post
Is there anyone that you don’t think is a prostitute? Or do you just have a tiny, tiny vocabulary?
comment in response to
post
You should post in your first language.
When you post in English it’s hard to figure out if your problem is a lack of comprehension or just an inability to express yourself.
comment in response to
post
JD is an idiot. If he wanted to find a prostitute that looked Indian he would have found millions if he just looked next door in Pakistan.
comment in response to
post
The problem is that there is a real problem with scams, they move quickly to every disaster and so we have to expect it here too.
But I don’t have a solution, other than BIG charities and some of them have issues too, the whole thing is a mess.
comment in response to
post
Agree, sounds it.
There was a computer nerd somewhere on Bluesky that analysed millions of posts and there were patterns of striking similarity between some GFM and unrelated scams from SE Asia.
I can’t find it now but I think it was 40% and there was no mention of Nigeria.
comment in response to
post
You understand service, right?
comment in response to
post
You didn’t have to self-blame.
comment in response to
post
Because it is obviously not relevant.
Dumb does not mean low IQ. People with high IQ can be lead into dumb decisions.
Even if there was a claimed connection national averages would not describe the extremes.
Your data would still be irrelevant even if IQ hadn’t been discredited as a measurement.
comment in response to
post
As if that were relevant.
comment in response to
post
Sweden clearly has less dumb people.
comment in response to
post
Nobody said you criticised Harris. Nobody knows what fuzziness you are spoofing. I certainly haven’t ever lost to whoever you think I am opposing.
But we know why you used a screenshot to comment in a different thread, because you were so obvs wrong in that thread.
comment in response to
post
Haha, thank you.
How on earth did he reach that opinion?
comment in response to
post
You’d certainly be something other than the current US.
comment in response to
post
I think they ran a better campaign than Trump, but you do you.
comment in response to
post
No, you must be responding to someone else.
I am clearly saying they are dumb.
comment in response to
post
And yet, she would have easily won the Presidential election if the voters were not so dumb.
comment in response to
post
If you look at his posts over time it’s clear he is also humping for Trump. The “Luigi” thing is just a distraction.
comment in response to
post
You are basically saying they should lie in order to win.
comment in response to
post
It’s not their job to compel you.
If voters can’t see clearly enough to vote against the worse option, they have only themselves to blame.
comment in response to
post
I can think of one other historical leader known for interfering in the development of fighter planes.
comment in response to
post
The last person who didn’t understand the purpose of quotation marks?
comment in response to
post
The “nope” suggests you are arguing that proto fascists are actually nice.
Otherwise you are agreeing with my comment that you mostly knew horrible dudes.
Either way it’s sad for you. I was aware of a few of those characters but I would not then have or now put it at more than 10% of dudes.
comment in response to
post
You mostly knew horrible dudes.
comment in response to
post
Dude, if you care at all for Gaza, delete these odious, misogynistic and just plain weird posts from an account professing to care about Gaza.
You’re ridiculing Gaza by association.
comment in response to
post
Voting could have avoided this, though.
comment in response to
post
Haha, good reference.
I think he is maybe weirdly attempting a new way to state ‘logistics will always trump muscle” but it’s hard to be sure.
comment in response to
post
I imagined that pointing them out would annoy you enough to make you respond again.
comment in response to
post
My consistent position has been that Trump was objectively discernibly worse long before he was elected.
Your consistent argument has been that Harris was no worse than Trump, possibly or more topics but you have mostly banged on to me about Palestine and LGBT rights.
comment in response to
post
True, you said they were indistinguishable but for “the black woman running it”.
I prefer not to read too much into that choice of words but I still think the vast majority of Americans can find some distinguishing point between Trump and Harris other than skin colour.
comment in response to
post
Naomi Wolf announcing all of those sodomy executions springs to mind as a good example of someone just not understanding the importance of deep learning in a particular field.
comment in response to
post
📌 will check when I get a chance but if it’s what it sounds like, thank you for that, didn’t occur to me something like that might exist.
comment in response to
post
Yes, you can if you can figure out their handle, but it’s a bit manual and tedious.
The easier way is to pick them out of the list of people blocking you (from Clearsky) and block there.
comment in response to
post
You wouldn’t see it. You’re already blocked.
comment in response to
post
Absolutely.
And a lot of white supremacists would still not accept them.
Going back to the original point, white supremacists don’t change their views every time normies change a Census form, and so in some circles Fuentes would still be up against the wall.
comment in response to
post
Fuentes, the non-white white supremacist.
comment in response to
post
Excruciatingly close to a moment of realisation.
comment in response to
post
Caprine is to goat as feline is to cat. (Apologies if your musing was rhetorical.)