here4thecomments.bsky.social
#Democrat - Strategist - #Autistic - Engineering by Trade - Dissenting - American by way of #Irish #Immigrants đźđȘđ
627 posts
223 followers
104 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I gave a very specific example which you have deduced to one topic contrary to my sentiment.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit already.
comment in response to
post
You donât want diversity?
So you want uniformity - one same person.
You donât want equity?
So you want favoritism and prejudice.
You donât want inclusion?
So you want exclusion, division, & omission.
The anti DEI folks need to just put on a Klan outfit at this point.
comment in response to
post
Elon typing in third person on his own account as if we donât know đ
comment in response to
post
The account with no followers or posts calls me a bot and self proclaims a win. You donât compete when you donât compare. More like a participation trophy. Very DEI of you. Love that! See weâre making progress.
comment in response to
post
I donât engage with MAGA to preserve my brain cells butttttttt you inspired me with your mediocre, unoriginal name calling đ MWAH đ
open.spotify.com/track/3aA6xB...
comment in response to
post
Is this is the account of an anti vax, raw milk drinker, who wants to cure my autism with essential oils?
comment in response to
post
Is this is the account of an anti vax, raw milk drinker, who wants to cure my autism with essential oils?
comment in response to
post
Or tuberculosis or the raw milk people (I guess thatâs dysentery too) lol. This woman has some âannoyingâ ideas. I support this strategy. Most of their voicemails are full. Fax machine and letters in mass. My printer is going to be working on overtime.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AmunpC/
comment in response to
post
Several articles today about this with quotes. I now plan to be the MOST âannoyingâ if thatâs how they want to play.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AmMGRa/
comment in response to
post
Oh I plan to make annoying my full time effort now. đ
comment in response to
post
Oh for sure. Now Iâm living to be extra annoying. đ
comment in response to
post
But is he wrong in what heâs saying? Asses aside (lol)
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre now bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre already bitching that weâre calling too much.
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
Update: theyâre already bitching about us âcalling too muchâ
www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2AUoydt/
comment in response to
post
In this photo: Elon is our president, his kid is in a meeting (if a woman did that no one would stfu for 4 years about it), kid tells Trump to shut up. Yeah this is a real life SNL skit weâre living in.
comment in response to
post
Right! Providing food for a baby?! Egregious. It would be the headline news, podcast topic, and âdebateâ of the century, etc.
comment in response to
post
Exactly! Not to mention heâs using the kid as a human shield no less.
comment in response to
post
If a woman had her son in any meeting let alone the White House. Omfg sheâd be called unqualified, distracted, a bad mom, and no one would stfu about it for 4 years.
comment in response to
post
If a woman had her son in any meeting let alone the White House. Omfg sheâd be called unqualified, distracted, a bad mom, and no one would stfu about it for 4 years.
comment in response to
post
If a woman had her son in any meeting let alone the White House. Omfg sheâd be called unqualified, distracted, a bad mom, and no one would stfu about it for 4 years.
comment in response to
post
If a woman had her son in any meeting let alone the White House. Omfg sheâd be called unqualified, distracted, a bad mom, and no one would stfu about it for 4 years.
comment in response to
post
If a woman had her son in any meeting let alone the White House. Omfg sheâd be called unqualified, distracted, a bad mom, and no one would stfu about it for 4 years.
comment in response to
post
If a woman had her son in any meeting let alone the White House. Omfg sheâd be called unqualified, distracted, a bad mom, and no one would stfu about it for 4 years.
comment in response to
post
Heâs a disruptor. He disrupts, distracts, and we all talk about him again. Then he goes silent for a while and does it again every couple of years. Thatâs also a marketing strategy.
comment in response to
post
#Kanye tweeted #Elon X offered $2M to make fake crypto. Has anyone considered heâs being paid for his Nazi tshirt charade to rebrand Zionists & make us think theyâre the victim now that Trump plans to make #Gaza a resort? Marketing term is psychological scapegoating FYI. Disrupt/distract/false flag
comment in response to
post
You ask questions to the public on here for clickbait and never respond. Cut the shit.
comment in response to
post
#Kanye tweeted #Elon (X) offered $2M to make fake crypto. Has anyone ever considered heâs being paid to do this Nazi tshirt charade to rebrand Zionists and make us think theyâre the victim now that Trump wants to turn #Gaza into a resort? Itâs called psychological scapegoating in marketing FYI.
comment in response to
post
100% but we need to recognize the weaponized strategy of it from Elon and Trump. Itâs performative to gain empathy for Zionists and promote trumps agenda to make Gaza a hotel. Theyâre slick. We need to recognize the psychological games.