hmqxwkn.bsky.social
@hmqxwkn, @critica_omette on X
50 posts
125 followers
1,021 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Alla fine si buttano comunque
comment in response to
post
Credo sia meglio scambiarle, così che si usurino allo stesso modo.
Abbiamo una gomma che si consuma di 1/3000 per km, l'altra 1/7000.
Troviamo una distanza x tale che, se le scambiamo, le consumiamo tutte:
x/7000 + x/3000 = 1
x = 2100 km
Quindi un treno di ruote fa 4200 km, due 8400 km.
comment in response to
post
That's really unfair to Elon
comment in response to
post
Yes, but the title does imply "climate". And one is of course hinted at the Paris agreement with this formulation
comment in response to
post
We haven't really though, no? The climate definition of breaking the 1.5°C threshold should be for a sustained period, not for a single year.
comment in response to
post
Era una domanda retorica. Se ho dato una risposta è ovviamente giusta
comment in response to
post
Era giusta?
comment in response to
post
Allora
456---- 10000
-456--- 9000
--456-- 9000
---456- 9000
----456 9000
Doppi:
456456- 10
456-456 10
-456456 9
45971
comment in response to
post
Ah, NON inizia con 0. Continuiamo a non saper leggere il resto 😂😂
comment in response to
post
A meno che si intenda anche 654 come consecutiva
comment in response to
post
Uh, vediamo.
0 obbligato.
456 può andare
0456___
0_456__
0__456_
0___456
Di ognuno di questi ce ne sono 1000.
Quindi 4000, ma...
Meno uno, contato 2 volte
0456456
3999
comment in response to
post
Se c'è qualcuno che li riposta posso partecipare, ogni tanto -- fuori concorso
comment in response to
post
Come va nell'altro posto? Lotta a due?
comment in response to
post
Lo prenderanno dagli oceani 😁
comment in response to
post
Learning from the worst disasters
comment in response to
post
Right, built a giant wall in the north. The north remembers.
Winter is coming
comment in response to
post
Don't be so pessimistic. It's not about the market, it's because of the deportations
comment in response to
post
7) This one is fun:
Remember when Trump won the “inflation election”, as voters united behind him because they were p***ed off with rising prices?
Fast forward a few months and Americans’ inflation expectations are now as high as they were at the peak of Biden-era price rises.
comment in response to
post
He got right wing deniers to buy teslas to own the libs. Might be the most hidden agenda ever
comment in response to
post
Missed the reference, sorry 😅
comment in response to
post
A lot of people
comment in response to
post
Only if N =1, or P = 0
comment in response to
post
They probably meant javascript
comment in response to
post
Climate negationists feel so much in need of a even a shred of a scientific article that they'd actually take anything even remotely suggesting they're not lunatics.