huntercombstx.bsky.social
alt-center-left shitposter.
841 posts
58 followers
77 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Strip searches and hurtful words are not rape.
comment in response to
post
lmaoooooooooooo
They called blowing up a fucking fertility clinic "gender based violence" 😆
As if Gaza, of all fucking places, needed a fertility clinic in the first place.
comment in response to
post
That said, I'd take this claim (which mysteriously disappeared from the Palestinian propaganda repertoire and was never mentioned again after November 2023) much more seriously if there was any specific claimed victim, not "I heard my friend say her friend said..."
comment in response to
post
You'll excuse me if take this one with a grain of salt after Palestinian women have already confessed to lying about rape in this conflict to make Israel look bad.
Every accusation is a confession.
comment in response to
post
Do you think him hiding under a hospital was a war crime? Or do you just not give a shit about any crimes Hamas commits, as usual?
comment in response to
post
God, you're such a slimy fucking serpent. You take avoiding questions to an art form.
Are you accusing this woman of lying about having been raped by Palestinian men or aren't you? Yes or no? Don't change the fucking subject again to "but it doesn't justfy..." YES OR NO?
comment in response to
post
Strip searches by male guards are not "rape".
Show me a specific allegation of actual, penetrative rape (where the man has his pants off) of a Palestinian woman by an Israeli man. Or, at minimum, a specific individual who claims it happened to her/is claimed to have happened to her.
comment in response to
post
No you didn't. You answered with a negative. I asked what the fuck he was doing there. What's your answer? In the affirmative.
comment in response to
post
This woman was raped by Palestinian men. One of the only women raped by Palestinian men who wasn't killed partway through the process.
www.cnn.com/2024/03/26/m...
Unless you want to accuse her of making it up?
comment in response to
post
Palestinian men have raped Israeli women in this war.
Israeli men have not raped Palestinian women in this war.
I don't care what happened to adult male Hamas members. Whatever happened to them, it's a shame they survived the process.
comment in response to
post
I didn't ask what he WASN'T doing there, I asked what he WAS doing there.
Why was Mohammed SInwar in a tunnel under a hospital? Do you think it was legal for him to build his shelter there/
comment in response to
post
Hamas didn't manage to reach any hospitals. If they had, the occupants certainly would've been raped and killed. With this incident they displayed their intent to do so.
What the ever-loving fuck was Mohammed Sinwar doing hiding underneath a hospital and/or a school? I'm just going to keep asking.
comment in response to
post
I can't believe you have the balls to throw the accusation of pivoting back at me, and then post a shameless dodge like this chicken-shit right here.
Why did an airstrike that killed Mohammed Sinwar also damage a school and a hospital? What the fuck was he doing there?
comment in response to
post
I answered your bullshit, now you answer:
What the fuck was Mohammed Sinwar, head of Hamas, doing in a tunnel underneath a school and a hospital?
bsky.app/profile/hunt...
comment in response to
post
...under the wildest, most conspiratorial notion of a "mass Hannibal directive" (which, to be clear, there is *no* evidence for), this ambulance wouldn't have been targeted by anyone except Hamas.
"But whatabout-"
Not responding to that shit if you don't answer first.
comment in response to
post
"HURRRR, BLARRRGH, HANNIBAL DIRECTIVE!"
The bullshit claims about the "Hannibal directive" related to IDF helicopters targeting cars being driven by Hamas militants which were trying to escape back into Gaza after the concert massacre. An Israeli ambulance wouldn't be driven by Hamas, so even...
comment in response to
post
And yes, Hamas did attack ambulances in Israel.
afmda.org/news/kissufi...
comment in response to
post
The hospital is still standing. The bombs exploded underground, killing Sinwar by caving in the tunnel he was in. Some shaking damaged nearby buildings.
Why was Sinwar in a tunnel underneath a hospital?
comment in response to
post
All that bullshit is irrelevant to the fact that the IDF wears uniforms in combat areas, and Hamas does not.
If Hamas wants to take a shot at Netanyahu, they don't have to go to a hospital to catch him. He isn't hiding. He and the IDF general staff are in a clearly marked building.
comment in response to
post
It's confirmed now, by the way.
If he's still alive, Hamas could easily embarrass the IDF by saying so. They don't even need to post a video or anything. Claiming it would be enough to cast doubt.
Yet they don't, and their surrogates are already speaking as if Sinwar were dead.
comment in response to
post
And why THE FUCK was the leader of Hamas, Mohammed Sinwar, killing in a bombing that struck (near) a hospital, as is increasingly certain was the case?
comment in response to
post
No, because Netanyahu is a political leader. Israel, unlike Hamas, distinguishes between combatants and civilians. Soldiers (not plain-clothes police operating in a controlled, friendly area) wear uniforms. That means Hamas cannot presume any Israeli political leader is also a militant.
comment in response to
post
How surprising that you, with your esteemed doctorate of conflict law from the University of Your Ass, have used your expertise in this area to judge that the IDF's conduct was not consonant with the Geneva convention in this raid. Since you've already said you wouldn't accept any justification.
comment in response to
post
How did Hamas being there end up "defending" anyone in the hospital, or the hospital itself?
comment in response to
post
I gave you the citation, you just ignored it. GC, A21.
comment in response to
post
"Defending"?
Do you think that 200+ Hamas terrorists being holed up in this hospital made it *LESS* likely to be attacked by the IDF? Or more likely?
(0% chance you'll answer that)
comment in response to
post
HEY
WHY IS THERE AN ENTRY ON THE "COMMANDERS AND LEADERS" SECTION FOR HAMAS IN THIS WIKIBOX FOR A HOSPITAL SIEGE?
WHY ARE THERE "UNITS INVOLVED"?
DON'T SAY SHIT TO ME IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER FOR THAT.
comment in response to
post
Except Israel didn't "murder everybody inside". Most of the Hamas, PIJ etc. terrorists and their collaborators in the hospital were taken into custody.
The ones who got killed, like the terrorist commanding officer Mahbouh, are the ones who unwisely chose to fight instead of surrender.
comment in response to
post
Yes!
Yes, I *DO* want you to say that everyone inside that hospital should have been unarmed! Please, say that!
comment in response to
post
If the protection of a hospital ceases, then airstrikes on it which follow the rules of proportionality and are targeted at militants (which the examples you gave all were) are not illegal.
If you don't care about Hamas committing war crimes, why should *I* care about anything you complain about?
comment in response to
post
Show me where in the Geneva conventions that it says air strikes on a hospital are always illegal in every possible circumstance.
Also, since you skipped past the question that was inconvenient for you yet again, WHY WAS THERE A 2 WEEK FIREFIGHT AGAINST WHO WAS IN THAT HOSPITAL?
comment in response to
post
(That hospital isn't "blown up" by the way. It's still standing. The damage you're posting there was inflicted during infantry combat and supporting fire from vehicles, not aerial bombardment.)
comment in response to
post
And WHY was there a 2-week long siege and gun battle that left the hospital riddled with bullets?
Who do you think the IDF was fighting in there? Let me guess - pregnant women doctors and journalist children, right? 🥴
comment in response to
post
Which hospital, specifically, has been "blown up" by Israel in this war?
I suspect any examples you give will involve damage to a single room, at most.
comment in response to
post
Don't they feel silly, LARPing in those things?
All of those 'deep, spiritual caretakers of the land' are gonna throw the headgear in a closet, crack open a coke zero from the fridge, and plop down on the couch to watch "The Pitt" on Netflix as soon as their protest is over.
comment in response to
post
It literally is an excuse. You haven't read the international law in question. Article 21 of the Geneva convention.
ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treat...
You cannot possibly claim that Hamas, in April of 2025, had not received sufficient warning to stop using hospitals to conceal Hamas leadership.
comment in response to
post
Yes, it is a pivot, because you are still refusing to engage with the issue of Hamas using these buildings as hiding places and trying to return to playing offense on Israel's conduct - which I engaged in extensively in good faith, but I won't anymore with no reciprocity.
Your logic is faulty, btw.
comment in response to
post
I'm perfectly willing to have that conversation if you will engage with my contention that Hamas was committing war crimes by using hospitals as shields from IDF airstrikes.
Can you either affirm or deny that that is the case, without trying to pivot away to something else for a change?
comment in response to
post
You could've wasted less of your time by giving a brief, one-line example rather than making multiple posts about why you aren't obligated to provide any evidence for your claims, if your precious time was the issue.
I'm not not asking for a citation, just some idea what you're referring to.
comment in response to
post
Entering a hospital because you'll get killed by airstrikes if you set up in any other kind of building in Gaza is a war crime.
Raiding or launching precise strikes on hospitals that have already been militarized by terrorists seeking to shield themselves from airstrikes is not a war crime. HTH
comment in response to
post
Logically, if they were killed in an attack on a hospital - especially the Hamas Major General who was killed in a firefight, meaning he and his bodyguards were carrying assault weapons - then they were hiding in the hospital.
Entering a hospital being used for military purposes is not a war crime
comment in response to
post
Well, I didn't just threaten someone with genocide for disagreeing with me on the internet.
So, there's that.
comment in response to
post
Hatred justifies genocide, you say?
Hmm.
comment in response to
post
You made the claim, you should do the research, or else admit that you don't have any answer to that question.
Can you admit that?
comment in response to
post
Maybe I should have been more clear.
I'm accusing you of lying about any such "land theft" happening prior to the civil war. Do you have any evidence you can cite to contradict that accusation?
comment in response to
post
Which immigrants were "stealing land from the inhabitants" prior to 1948 when the Arabs started a "war of extermination" (in their own words)?