i-330.bsky.social
32 posts
21 followers
35 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
youtu.be/svUyYzzv6VI
comment in response to
post
You can if you're mainlining.
"Today’s plan mainlines AI into the veins of this enterprising nation."
comment in response to
post
Not quite sure what to make of Alan Turing's early grief-stricken meditation on the body but it seems relevant: oldshirburnian.org.uk/alan-turing-...
comment in response to
post
"AI's distance and disembodiment leads to a total breakdown in how it predicts human behavior." Yes, the AI boosters haven't come to terms with this although critics have been telling them this for decades.
comment in response to
post
Intelligence is conceptualized within the field of AI as disembodied because of the field's inability to free itself from Cartesianism.
comment in response to
post
Also see Paris Marx's Data Vampires series.
techwontsave.us/episode/241_...
comment in response to
post
Also see:
www.theguardian.com/global-devel...
comment in response to
post
Here's another article. Meant to post this earlier to your original request.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
comment in response to
post
A look at UX design and how it frames interaction:
mail.cyberneticforests.com/its-interest...
comment in response to
post
The company that can't figure out how to build a fridge with functioning ice maker.
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/i-33...
comment in response to
post
There's also a follow-up post: garymarcus.substack.com/p/c39
comment in response to
post
garymarcus.substack.com/p/o3-agi-the...
comment in response to
post
www.wiley.com/en-us/Philos...
comment in response to
post
If he read a little wider, he'd understand that it's not much of an idea. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
comment in response to
post
Unrestrained corporate power is violence. Adam Smith was writing about this 250 years ago.
comment in response to
post
There's also this classic from 30 years ago:
www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v1...
comment in response to
post
The whistle on this train has been blowing for awhile:
www.politico.com/magazine/sto...
comment in response to
post
Apparently, the Graun is unfamiliar with British economic anthropology. I can't wait until they 'rediscover' his brother, Michael, and British sociology of science.
comment in response to
post
www.theguardian.com/books/articl...
comment in response to
post
cass.independent-review.uk/home/publica...
comment in response to
post
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
comment in response to
post
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
comment in response to
post
Part of intended effect, when AI is anthropomorphized by AI boosters, is that the metaphorical is misapprehened as literal.
comment in response to
post
"The danger comes when fetishism gives way to theology, the absolute assurance that the gods are real."
comment in response to
post
One can see anthropomorphism of AI as a type of fetishism. For discussion see:
Graeber, David. “Fetishism as Social Creativity: Or, Fetishes Are Gods in the Process of Construction.” Anthropological Theory 5, no. 4 (December 1, 2005): 407–38.
comment in response to
post
The anthropomorphism of AI is problematic but that approach to the problem seems likely to be unworkable and counterproductive. See Melanie Mitchell's recent article in Science:
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
comment in response to
post
"The question now is, what we will do next?" Read Wittgenstein? The whole field appears to be mired in long-debunked philosophical tropes.
comment in response to
post
The big picture isn't funny:
open.substack.com/pub/bloodint...
comment in response to
post
youtu.be/iH4Pn4bpOfQ
comment in response to
post
Teachers don't appear to be buying into the hype:
open.substack.com/pub/danmeyer...
comment in response to
post
Whatever they mean by the term it's nothing like human intelligence, which is embodied, social,....