idempotentrodent.bsky.social
I live in a house
by the sea
44 posts
12 followers
162 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Gotta connect those sharp points
comment in response to
post
What in my post is untrue? I didn’t say that their charts are false. I just noted that the evidence of a predictive science is demonstrating how massively dynamic events correlate to your chart values. Market advisors, meterologists, etc, are those whose predictive charts beat random chance.
comment in response to
post
True, I just found it strange since the videos were of professors. It’s unlikely the average Bluesky user would recognize a specific French professor by sight, and very likely no one at all would recognize them by their voice. Wouldn’t it make sense to film an entirely fake “professor”, sans AI?
comment in response to
post
That’s true, but even I (neither an astronaut nor climate scientist) can throw together charts and figures using common Python libraries, and look just as official as “real” climate statistics. The evidence of climate science’s validity is “the weather matched my predictions and this grisly chart!”
comment in response to
post
One odd detail: the article claims Russia made “deepfake” videos by taking real video clips (twice) and faking the audio tracks to say false things. But this isn’t deep faking… and it would be an odd strategy because deep faking DOES exist, and doesn’t rely on dubbing audio onto found footage.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for this resource.
comment in response to
post
May I request an example of one of these accounts? Also, what software are they running which has deterministically emitted evidence proving that it’s a malignant “robot” and not simply someone with a counter (and perhaps incorrect) opinion than your own?
comment in response to
post
If anyone from 99.999% of the earth’s population was to tell you “I just made a trip to the moon. Here are some pictures of the moon and me, as evidence”, I don’t think you would conclude “most likely this weird bastard really went to the moon somehow!”. Even if he had 10, 50 or 1000 pictures.
comment in response to
post
Some say dishonesty could not ever exist at scale, because “somebody’d spill the beans” or “you can’t organize that many liars!”. But if every “climate expert” is waving fake data, no climate expert can be in the field AND deny the “data”. You’d just say “well he’s not a climate expert”, no?
comment in response to
post
If all you make is 5 figures and you are aware that not participating in a big climate metaphor will take away your 5 figures permanently, wouldn’t that be at least as motivating as what drives the petroleum company execs, who fear nothing i.e. only lie out of greed, not desperation?
comment in response to
post
You’re free to use hyperbole if you like. Imagine being the guy who, in the situation we are in planet wide, chooses to sneer “Oh brother! Check out this over reacting we got here! Uh, check please? I’ve got to get back to my date with REALITY.”
comment in response to
post
The government is literally made of people, and it’s made up of more people than you’d think.
comment in response to
post
This is, in fact, how democracy dies. Lists and lists of the enemies of Stalin until one day Stalin’s list has your name. But there must be some mistake! I used the correct words and I was the last to stop clapping at the opera!
comment in response to
post
Sir I am clearly already ruins
comment in response to
post
:|
This was a real opportunity for self-awareness hereabout how dogmatically emphasizing that race “informs every interaction” will just make the races you like split into sub-races who define by not liking others in their own race, for the social power that comes with justifying “race awareness”
comment in response to
post
Exactly! These are the exact words I’ve been begging my family members to understand. The apparatus will never close shop, it will only expand its customer base.
comment in response to
post
It’s not any better in Texas. I should have stayed in LA
comment in response to
post
Good for him. We gotta support Ukraine
comment in response to
post
It must be so relieving to have decided a global conspiracy of vexatious Gargamels are paying every media figure you don’t agree with to specifically disagree with you. Think of all the retorts you don’t have to make! Your intellectual foes just pretend to believe things, all for dirty Russian $’s!
comment in response to
post
Looks like they digitally transformed
comment in response to
post
Do you feel it’s likely she will order the shipments to stop?
comment in response to
post
She claims the AP set up the “attack” like a film set, setting off controlled explosions and driving tanks through town for the footage that made the initial report. I’m not aware of any Fox interview but also I don’t watch Fox so I wouldn’t have seen it
comment in response to
post
And what was this evidence? Were to believe the lunatic E Jean had this footage or DNA sample or confession letter kept secret for decades, and never got around to filing a police report, which would have been required to prosecute Trump years ago?
comment in response to
post
So there was no rape conviction, but the trial over whether he lied by saying “I’m innocent of rape” concluded this was a lie, because of… their really strong hunch? The statute of limitations expiring means a person is legally not guilty of an accusation, yet here they pretend it means the opposite
comment in response to
post
But they very soon after chose to prosecute him on 34 charges which almost no one can name, meaning they are willing to drop everything to indict Trump for nominal crimes. But also they were just too lazy to convict him of “violent rape”, despite it being “beyond a shadow of a doubt”?
Seriously
comment in response to
post
She says the AP faked the attack and told everyone interviewed on camera what to say. So what she was to say in the aftermath of the hoax attack was by her admission untrue. There’s nothing strange about lying and then later admitting the truth.
comment in response to
post
So the case BOTH proved he was guilty of rape, and ALSO that he defamed her by saying he was innocent, but then the Justice Department just decided not to prosecute the freshly proven crime? Why did they do that?
comment in response to
post
This is logical? A jury “held” that he was a rapist? When chronologically was there a verdict of rape, so that later they could “hold” this as a proven fact to base their conclusion of defamation on? Do you believe it is defamation to say “I’m innocent” if the jury merely “holds” your guilt?
comment in response to
post
So you’re saying we can’t trust her because she shows signs of being an unstable drug addict, but also we should absolutely trust her because the main person who says her story wasn’t real is… herself, the unstable drug addict?
comment in response to
post
Rape convictions do not result in monetary damages paid to the victim. Rape is a criminal offense not a civil one, so it seems evident what you are describing is not a debt related to “rape”.
comment in response to
post
Ironic. I actually follow that exact woman on Instagram and she has repeatedly said that this story was staged and the quotes attributed to her are not true. Her IG is gixi_beauty I believe
comment in response to
post
is BlueSky where we can wink at each other over posts like this, because we both know they don’t need *phone* location data to find us anymore? *wink wink*