inchide.bsky.social
Schadenfreude TF
i.e., people that get TFed into female anthro (who still keep their hair and keep a familiar look to their original human form) in a surprising/reluctant way and having to deal with all the inconveniences that stem from this.
1,461 posts
47 followers
0 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Lower Decks, for me, is more of a love letter to the whole franchise than a shitpost.
comment in response to
post
What?
comment in response to
post
(sorry if you already knew about it)
comment in response to
post
And Trump re-allowed it. You aren't invalidating my point.
comment in response to
post
I like leftists, though (then again, I am an ecologist).
comment in response to
post
Suddenly thinking (though I am certainly not the first) that the Sentry in theMCU Marvel could actually be written as a spoof of the "military"-loaded/gritty/almost-too-detached-from-humanity DCU Superman we have got for the last decade, if that make sense.
comment in response to
post
Nope.
comment in response to
post
"the original post Bob made about how all Snyder fans are domestic terrorists"
Again, he never made such post.
comment in response to
post
Again, you need to read and understand what he is saying the same way you understand when someone say a football supporter is an hooligan.
comment in response to
post
Again, what you need to read and understand is THIS:
comment in response to
post
I know it because I was there at its inception and was stupid enough to actually believe it was about "ethic in video game journalism", only to see the mask quickly fall off and see what the real anger was about.
comment in response to
post
Gamergate WAS a Rigth Wing coalition FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, The point and hope of the movement from the start was that video-game news would fire all the game journalists talking about "white privilege" in their videogame info-tainment and that it would force all the other to shut up about it.
comment in response to
post
"to find all this magical nuance"
Like I said, and like he later elaborated in the post I screencapped, most people understand what someone actually mean when they simply said "Football supporters are hooligans".
When you asked him to elaborate, he did and you are now like "no, that doesn't count!"
comment in response to
post
There was. Anyone with reading comprehension can immediately pick it up.
comment in response to
post
The same amount of nuance as to when someone call football supporter "hooligans".
Also, this wasn't his argument there:
bsky.app/profile/mike...
comment in response to
post
"Bob is saying that anyone who expresses enthusiasm for the Snyder Cut is a domestic terrorist."
Nope.
"It’s very easy to win if you pretend your opponent is made of straw. "
comment in response to
post
Anyway, how was this not your argument when you said that Bob would dispute a tem supporters being called a domestic terrorist?
comment in response to
post
I'd say, "yeah, those a real fuckers and I wish they didn't exist, I am with you on that one. Hope there won't be any around for this game" instead of taking personal offence or thinking I need to defend the virtue of other supporters.
bsky.app/profile/mike...
comment in response to
post
So then you should know you didn't made a valid argument to begin with when you said a sport supporters would dispute being compared to domestic terrorists.
bsky.app/profile/inch...
comment in response to
post
1. They usually know they aren't part of those hooligans
2. They know it's a real problem and actually condemn it too.
comment in response to
post
Hooligans are not even an half-step away from actual domestic terrorists, and yeah, most football fans are aware that a part of their supporters are (justifiably) compared to domestic terrorists. And most of them don't take umbrage from it because:
comment in response to
post
Someone from Europe, here. I don't know everything about the sport culture in the US, but where I live, our football competitions (which you wrongly call "soccer", but that's an other debate) have been for a long time to be tarnished by a part of the supporters known as "hooligans".
comment in response to
post
From what I have seen, for the smaller creators who have also made an account on bluesky, some ended up still mostly posting on twitter because their (relatively) small following still hasn't moved there yet and thus are still getting more reply/interactions on twitter than on Bluesky.
comment in response to
post
Has he the legal power to do it? If not, they are technically still not fired.
comment in response to
post
There isn't a federal police force? Even the FBI?
comment in response to
post
Okay, but who has authority to use strength to forcibly remove that kind of person? Wouldn't it be as simple as calling the police and make that moron move?
comment in response to
post
"gone"?
comment in response to
post
*partenairing
My bad.
comment in response to
post
HOLLY HELL! YOU ARE NOW PRODUCING FAR-FETCHED?
This is awesome!
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
But he doesn't look like a Watcher, though. Or changes into one in that scene.
I always assumed, from that scene, that he was some sort of agent or informant of the Watchers, but not an actual one himself.
comment in response to
post
Uh? I thought the reason of the Amish's lifestyle wasn't motivated in itself by scripture... Is that what originated the movement?
I thought it was more of a rejection of the stress of modern life and the Christian value was there mostly because, well, most of them were Christians to begin with.
comment in response to
post
Thing is, I am quite certain many Americans would go to this precisely because it's named like this.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I... I am sorry, but I have been so much used to see that kind of imagery in distopian "near-future" movies from the 80's...
It's so fucking weird to see it in real life.
comment in response to
post
And yet an other Genocide enabler.
comment in response to
post
Are you aware of the existence of this?
bsky.app/profile/drif...
comment in response to
post
Sometimes the best thing you can do to someone is to force to dunk their nose in their own dunk and tell to their face how much of a piece of shit they have done.
I am rarely for though love, but sometimes it's what it takes to put someone straight.
comment in response to
post
Why do those guys always look like "the asshole character that will date-rape or attempt to do so" in those TV/movie dramas?
Like, do they actively try to ape that style of those specific characters they se on TV?
comment in response to
post
Where EXACTLY was the empathy & compassion of the people you now defend when the convicted felon Donold Trump told them EXACTLY what he was going to do if they voted for him? He REPEATEDLY stated he would do EXACTLY what he is doing. WHY is it this a problem of non-Trump voters? You miss the point.
comment in response to
post
Meaning that if all those against it would have voted for, let's say, Jill Stein, it would still have splitted the vote and resulted in trump winning. i.e., the worst for Palestine. This is something you refuse to understand.
comment in response to
post
"Actually, Americans could have chosen to vote for someone not genocidal."
Or you could have wished for unicorns.
The reality is, and I know you willnot deny it, there is still a fraction of the Dem voters who was for what was going on in Palestine.
comment in response to
post
To not have Trump as president.