indistinguished.bsky.social
interested in the financial markets, macro, monetary policy, derivative trading strategies, etc.
61 posts
6 followers
32 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Is the world in hunger?
comment in response to
post
This very well might be. I have 60 bucks number in my head, but, indeed, the cost may go down with the improvement of the technologies.
comment in response to
post
Wow! I assume you are talking about the Texas Permian Basin. Is that right?
comment in response to
post
Is fracking now less than 60 $/barrel production cost?
comment in response to
post
What do you think the sustainable oil price range is? I'd say $70 is kind of cheap taking into account the loss of purchasing power of the dollar. It is probably around $40 in 2015 terms. Would you say it is at the bottom of the range?
comment in response to
post
Yeah. My comment was sarcastic
comment in response to
post
Russel is still OK to trade. I don't believe in charts though. But this is my personal opinion. I know others are into charts.
comment in response to
post
Day 1
comment in response to
post
Peter Zeihan needs to work overtime now
comment in response to
post
It may be the goal. So there is more stimulus down the road. More inflation for the assets prices.
comment in response to
post
Give them some credit for reinventing themselves (or their hype story rather). It takes some creativity.
comment in response to
post
He might try just that. "100 billion self-driving robotaxis" card has already been played.
comment in response to
post
No. He has pretty much a religious following. No manipulation. Just a bunch of idiots.
comment in response to
post
It is good for the economy
comment in response to
post
Same here. It is hard to spend money when you don't know if you have a job or not in a month from now.
comment in response to
post
Is this a lot? (Sorry. Being too lazy to google)
comment in response to
post
I used to use TikZ. There is no way in hell I could've made something like this in a finite amount of time.
comment in response to
post
Bin Laden contributed to the downslide of the US after all.
comment in response to
post
The only rationale is the inflation expectations
comment in response to
post
This is hilarious. Masks are off.
comment in response to
post
x.com/RealAlexJone...
comment in response to
post
Will look. The title already sounds like nonsense.
comment in response to
post
Where did you get a picture of me?
comment in response to
post
Well, after all the government spending was a contributor to the economy. It will be sacrificed so someone currently in power can pay less taxes. Nothing is irrational here.
comment in response to
post
Interesting. It looks like we aren't going anywhere since 2019.
comment in response to
post
Has BLS staff been changed already?
comment in response to
post
It looks like he is a night owl
comment in response to
post
None of them are in a jail yet, but scientists working for NIH projects are already facing layoffs. Good job.
comment in response to
post
Here is another problem. NIH also pulled the plug on basic science. Most of the grants they fund are clinically oriented and translational in their nature. NSF is the only haven for basic science these days.
comment in response to
post
Domino's Pizza
comment in response to
post
Kind of crazy. Or rather outlying statistically speaking.
comment in response to
post
Right. I didn't even think of that in light of NIH cuts.
comment in response to
post
Will check them out. Thanks!
comment in response to
post
I am a volatility trader. Not sure what to learn from this model. Do you mind explaining a little bit? Thanks!