itsmikeschwartz.bsky.social
Dad to kids, dogs, and cats.
Don’t want to bother with Nazis, impersonators, or other trolls? Try my curated moderation list.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:pea3cwe3o2uml2rib6aiemt6/lists/3lbavg4pxxd2e
2,692 posts
322 followers
167 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Those fuckers are begging for people to invoke the Second.
comment in response to
post
Fuck this regime.
comment in response to
post
John Denver had a few classics. And some dreck. But his best songs were great.
IMO.
comment in response to
post
What an embarassing set for that show.
comment in response to
post
Abracadabra, you’re in South Sudan
comment in response to
post
If I were Starland Vocal Band, I’d have introduced the song in concert with something like “and now here’s our song about fuckin’ in the daylight that y’all love so much.”
comment in response to
post
You and I were lucky to grow up when documenting one’s own embarassing moments was not a habit.
The fact that Muskrat Love saw the light of day is mind-boggling.
That it had serious cover versions is beyond the pale.
comment in response to
post
Muskrat Love and Afternoon Delight are also part of the septic sludge from that era.
comment in response to
post
Seems to me the people still talking about e.g., bathrooms are the ones on the right. If they would shut their fucking traps and just treat everyone as human beings the discussion would be over.
Same for racism, homophobia, etc etc
comment in response to
post
Seems reasonable to assume you sieze a phone to search its contents, unless phones are routinely siezed and not searched.
But it seems the warrant boilerplate would specify siezure and search for content.
comment in response to
post
Why would you not?
comment in response to
post
Sounds ... unconstitutional to single out one state for special mistreatment.
comment in response to
post
Obvious in hindsight they delayed bringing him back until they had prepared a mechanism to keep him in custody.
comment in response to
post
Third bullet: "with the help of useful idiot Donald Trump Jr."
comment in response to
post
Our cats are very into their daily rituals. One of us being gone (or on the physically unable to perform list!) is a big disruption for them.
comment in response to
post
There's really no "algorithm" to it. It's just a filter looking for certain words in handles and names. No evaluation of the political lean of the account.
If you want something curated, look for a list that says it is curated.
comment in response to
post
It does, and the description of the list says that.
I figure that the accuracy is good enough and that I will probably not suffer any harm if I miss the input of someone who ties their online identity to Trump whether positively or negatively.
comment in response to
post
Unless you love (or can tolerate) fundraising as a lifestyle, advising is the way to go!
comment in response to
post
If?
comment in response to
post
Elon builds rockets that explode, and Johnson crafts legislation that everyone hates.
comment in response to
post
We've had this guy for 4 years now.
comment in response to
post
Mutual destruction is the best-case scenario. I'm rooting for them both to lose.
comment in response to
post
Just have to see the word "all" in a claim about jobs data and we know that the claim is a lie.
comment in response to
post
Some of y’all can’t handle 2 high agency males going at it and it really shows
comment in response to
post
Gotta have one first.
comment in response to
post
Probably StarLink as well.
comment in response to
post
Fuck that cowardly draft dodger and his farce of a parade.
comment in response to
post
I really wish the source was more reliable than Michael Wolff.
comment in response to
post
Enhancing doesn't really help with this one, but... yeah.
comment in response to
post
The makeup sex is gonna be ... nope, not going there.
comment in response to
post
🎯
comment in response to
post
Um, because there's no evidence that Epstein or Trump are into boys?
Now if he had let his son get into a vehicle with Matt Schlapp, we'd have a decent question.
comment in response to
post
You did. And you are the victim of a crime. He owes a debt to you and to society.
comment in response to
post
I hate to say it but that letter is more of an attempt at CYA than an apology.
You were defrauded.
comment in response to
post
Now that is authentic clarity of message.
comment in response to
post
Occam’s Razor says it is the two narcissists doing narcissist things.
comment in response to
post
Too dumb to be entertaining IMO.
comment in response to
post
Right? Elon has data-thieving loyalists planted in high level positions all over Trump’s government.
comment in response to
post
Any path to getting HHS on the defendant list?
comment in response to
post
Swordfighting, but the combatants are on opposite coasts.
And one sword is just a hilt, and the other is a toadstool.
comment in response to
post
Lol and he stole the Chief Anti-Immigration Officer's wife.
comment in response to
post
Looks like Democracy dies along with the planet.
comment in response to
post
Trump's reaction to this narcissistic injury is entirely and completely predictable.
comment in response to
post
You'd think so. I thought quorum for this committee would be 13 members.
comment in response to
post
🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
comment in response to
post
A birthright citizen.