jameslarkin13.bsky.social
Research interests: the marketing practices of the pharmaceutical & medical device industries, multimorbidity, out-of-pocket payments.
RCSI Postdoctoral fellow
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Larkin-2
63 posts
1,366 followers
472 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Great policy paper by Conchúr Ó Maonaigh, Laurie Reilly, @jenniecstephens.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
The striking similarities between these two industry statements & what unfolded since are analysed by us in the @bmj.com. We add to the extensive evidence that health-harming industries mimic tobacco industry strategies to promote their business interests www.bmj.com/content/388/...
comment in response to
post
Excellent editorial from @healthpromint.bsky.social @docsamantha.bsky.social @maritahennessy.bsky.social @katef224.bsky.social @cervanteewild.bsky.social @ashleighhaynes.bsky.social @shanekavanagh.bsky.social @orkanokan.bsky.social @mikedaube.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
Very interesting, didn't know about this. Could be a very useful resource
comment in response to
post
Great investigative work by Emily Rickard, Piotr Ozieranski and Shai Mulinari
comment in response to
post
@frankmoriarty.bsky.social @rcsi.bsky.social @esri.ie @tcddublin.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
Thanks so much Samantha, though @maritahennessy.bsky.social deserves all the kudos, she did the lion's share of the work.
And well done to you and the @healthpromint.bsky.social team on an excellent collection. Has given me some level of hope for the world of academic publishing.
comment in response to
post
I know, I shouldn't be surprised, especially with @maritahennessy.bsky.social alerting me to it on a weekly basis. But seeing Pepsi as flagship sponsor really is shocking
comment in response to
post
And I assume that’s what’s published? I’d be surprised if some of that 12% didn’t have some industry sponsorship.
I’m being a bit cheap only discussing Pepsi. There are a whole host of permissible food industry actors involved, many of whom are in your study, that are also problematic
comment in response to
post
« we found that a total of ninety-two food industry actors sponsored 88 % of these events »
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...