janbeecher.bsky.social
Professor Emeritus | Institutionalist | Policy wonk
445 posts
91 followers
60 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
January 6 and the pardons gave permission.
comment in response to
post
She thinks of Democrats as puppies.
comment in response to
post
The nation's food will start rotting in the fields.
comment in response to
post
federalnewsnetwork.com/contracting/...
comment in response to
post
If you trust the data.
comment in response to
post
Or sobered up enough to process what could be done to him?
comment in response to
post
Perhaps the weather gods will intervene.
comment in response to
post
Lies with abandon, and the propaganda works. They should stop broadcasting it.
comment in response to
post
I was thinking food trucks would be great, too!
comment in response to
post
They need to reconstitute the committee as a nongovernmental organization, university affiliate, or private entity.
comment in response to
post
A horrifying statement.
comment in response to
post
Has this "officer" been fired yet?
comment in response to
post
LA, Chicago, NYC.
comment in response to
post
The ICE henchman is already interjecting himself into local law enforcement, and refers to American citizens as "them."
comment in response to
post
They need tariff revenues (regressive sales tax) from Americans) for the budget.
comment in response to
post
After today, you have to wonder what the Tesla board might do.
comment in response to
post
After today, you have to wonder what the Tesla board might do.
comment in response to
post
They can reciprocate because they need the sales tax revenues from the tariffs. The long game may be to replace the somewhat progressive income tax with a very regressive national sales tax.
comment in response to
post
Very unlikely, but if he keeps provoking 47, they could unleash DOJ on him in an epic feud.
comment in response to
post
Breaking up is hard to do.
comment in response to
post
Ending the penny. Just say that.
comment in response to
post
How could he possibly have been successful at anything? Who would respect him?
comment in response to
post
Substantial tariff income = substantial regressive sales tax on Americans.
comment in response to
post
As in, to "move" to another country?
comment in response to
post
Maybe lawyers should sue their own firms.
comment in response to
post
A deeply disturbed subhuman who cannot begin to fathom adult behavior (let alone presidential decorum) and will never demonstrate it.
comment in response to
post
The court had to do what Congress should have done.
comment in response to
post
www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
comment in response to
post
He wants to free any and all members of his loyal militia.
comment in response to
post
And how about self-determination over reproduction, gender expression, and loving who you love?
comment in response to
post
They will try to pick us off, one by one. Law firms, universities, not-for-profits, media outlets, corporations... Collective response and action are the only options.
comment in response to
post
Duh. It's a science.
comment in response to
post
Astute observation about the failure to build institutions to sustain whatever the hell they think this is.
comment in response to
post
No kings, mad or otherwise.
comment in response to
post
Mad and King is still a bad combination.
comment in response to
post
Quid. Pro. Quo.
comment in response to
post
"...when a hearing is scheduled to occur in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Association of American Universities, et al. v. National Science Foundation, et al., No. 25-cv-11231."